Re: [89attendees] Remote participation is pretty good
"Rosen, Brian" <Brian.Rosen@neustar.biz> Fri, 07 March 2014 12:41 UTC
Return-Path: <Brian.Rosen@neustar.biz>
X-Original-To: 89attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 89attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com
(Postfix) with ESMTP id C5B501A0116 for <89attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>;
Fri, 7 Mar 2014 04:41:26 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9,
HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com
[127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PRT6itaj147c for
<89attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 7 Mar 2014 04:41:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: from neustar.com (mx1.neustar.com [156.154.17.104]) by
ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 30E141A008D for <89attendees@ietf.org>;
Fri, 7 Mar 2014 04:41:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: from stntexhc10.cis.neustar.com (unknown [10.31.58.69]) by
stihiron1.va.neustar.com with smtp (TLS: TLSv1/SSLv3,128bits,AES128-SHA) id
54e4_b3ee_b721e288_bc50_4f43_845c_a7604de1366c;
Fri, 07 Mar 2014 07:41:06 -0500
Received: from STNTEXMB10.cis.neustar.com ([169.254.5.252]) by
stntexhc10.cis.neustar.com ([169.254.4.33]) with mapi id 14.03.0158.001;
Fri, 7 Mar 2014 07:41:01 -0500
From: "Rosen, Brian" <Brian.Rosen@neustar.biz>
To: Hosnieh Rafiee <ietf@rozanak.com>, 'Tim Bray' <tbray@textuality.com>
Thread-Topic: [89attendees] Remote participation is pretty good
Thread-Index: AQHPOf7Oc0WG2z0VBU2PyJuLO+e+b5rV4lgAgAACcwA=
Date: Fri, 7 Mar 2014 12:41:00 +0000
Message-ID: <CF3F6DC8.4FB56%brian.rosen@neustar.biz>
In-Reply-To: <006d01cf3a01$42f674a0$c8e35de0$@rozanak.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.3.5.130515
x-originating-ip: [192.168.128.127]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="_000_CF3F6DC84FB56brianrosenneustarbiz_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/89attendees/qpaean2XXd8jeLB4XYDLEwREZA8
Cc: "89attendees@ietf.org" <89attendees@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [89attendees] Remote participation is pretty good
X-BeenThere: 89attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Mailing list of IETF 89 attendees that have opted in to the list."
<89attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/89attendees>,
<mailto:89attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/89attendees/>
List-Post: <mailto:89attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:89attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/89attendees>,
<mailto:89attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Mar 2014 12:41:27 -0000
I also must say that as a chair, we had a remote presenter using meetecho and while we did have a small start-up issue, it went very well. It was the best remote presentation experience I’ve seen at IETF. The technical team at meetecho seems to have worked pretty hard to make this capability work well with room audio. From: Hosnieh Rafiee <ietf@rozanak.com<mailto:ietf@rozanak.com>> Date: Friday, March 7, 2014 at 12:32 PM To: 'Tim Bray' <tbray@textuality.com<mailto:tbray@textuality.com>> Cc: "89attendees@ietf.org<mailto:89attendees@ietf.org>" <89attendees@ietf.org<mailto:89attendees@ietf.org>> Subject: Re: [89attendees] Remote participation is pretty good +1 I also liked it. It was a new experience…but one needs to get use to it since the way of talking is only writing in a jabber… and you have to be a fast typist :-) to send your message in a time it is replayed … From: 89attendees [mailto:89attendees-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Tim Bray Sent: Friday, March 07, 2014 1:14 PM To: 89attendees@ietf Subject: [89attendees] Remote participation is pretty good I had to leave early and take part in a WG meeting via Meetecho/Jabber and hey, it worked pretty well. –T
- [89attendees] Remote participation is pretty good Tim Bray
- Re: [89attendees] Remote participation is pretty … Hosnieh Rafiee
- Re: [89attendees] Remote participation is pretty … Hosnieh Rafiee
- Re: [89attendees] Remote participation is pretty … Rosen, Brian
- Re: [89attendees] Remote participation is pretty … joel jaeggli
- Re: [89attendees] Remote participation is pretty … Alexa Morris
- Re: [89attendees] Remote participation is pretty … John C Klensin
- Re: [89attendees] Remote participation is pretty … Hosnieh Rafiee