[89attendees] experiences (was Re: This hotel needs to rated on TripAdvisor)
Andrew Sullivan <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com> Wed, 05 March 2014 10:49 UTC
Return-Path: <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com>
X-Original-To: 89attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 89attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com
(Postfix) with ESMTP id 0DDC81A0406 for <89attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>;
Wed, 5 Mar 2014 02:49:17 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.141
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No,
score=-0.141 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9,
HELO_MISMATCH_INFO=1.448, HOST_MISMATCH_NET=0.311] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com
[127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7-JAXf2dPAlH for
<89attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 5 Mar 2014 02:49:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx1.yitter.info (ow5p.x.rootbsd.net [208.79.81.114]) by
ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9DC021A0404 for <89attendees@ietf.org>;
Wed, 5 Mar 2014 02:49:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx1.yitter.info (dhcp-bcfb.meeting.ietf.org [31.133.188.251])
(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client
certificate requested) by mx1.yitter.info (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id
A6FA88A031 for <89attendees@ietf.org>; Wed, 5 Mar 2014 10:49:11 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Wed, 5 Mar 2014 05:49:09 -0500
From: Andrew Sullivan <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com>
To: 89attendees@ietf.org
Message-ID: <20140305104908.GH9266@mx1.yitter.info>
References: <5316FC2F.9000101@nostrum.com>
<CF3CAD5D.4F93C%brian.rosen@neustar.biz>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CF3CAD5D.4F93C%brian.rosen@neustar.biz>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/89attendees/rS9Jp4ncowLRpz7D2QCRCTpB070
Subject: [89attendees] experiences (was Re: This hotel needs to rated on
TripAdvisor)
X-BeenThere: 89attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Mailing list of IETF 89 attendees that have opted in to the list."
<89attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/89attendees>,
<mailto:89attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/89attendees/>
List-Post: <mailto:89attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:89attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/89attendees>,
<mailto:89attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Mar 2014 10:49:17 -0000
On Wed, Mar 05, 2014 at 10:37:38AM +0000, Rosen, Brian wrote: > but the facilities are subpar, pretty much all around. About the only > positive thing I can say for facilities is that the chairs in the meeting > rooms are comfortable. This appears to illustrate how much one's experience varies. I find these chairs among the least comfortable things I've ever tried to sit upon. A -- Andrew Sullivan ajs@anvilwalrusden.com
- [89attendees] This hotel needs to rated on TripAd… Jethanandani, Mahesh
- Re: [89attendees] This hotel needs to rated on Tr… Peter Yee
- Re: [89attendees] This hotel needs to rated on Tr… John C Klensin
- Re: [89attendees] This hotel needs to rated on Tr… Ersue, Mehmet (NSN - DE/Munich)
- Re: [89attendees] This hotel needs to rated on Tr… Randall Gellens
- Re: [89attendees] This hotel needs to rated on Tr… Robert Moskowitz
- Re: [89attendees] This hotel needs to rated on Tr… Palanivelan Appanasamy
- Re: [89attendees] This hotel needs to rated on Tr… Tim Bray
- Re: [89attendees] This hotel needs to rated on Tr… Surendra Kumar (smkumar)
- Re: [89attendees] This hotel needs to rated on Tr… Adam Roach
- Re: [89attendees] This hotel needs to rated on Tr… N.Leymann
- Re: [89attendees] This hotel needs to rated on Tr… Ben Campbell
- Re: [89attendees] This hotel needs to rated on Tr… Thomas Herbst
- Re: [89attendees] This hotel needs to rated on Tr… Rosen, Brian
- [89attendees] experiences (was Re: This hotel nee… Andrew Sullivan
- Re: [89attendees] This hotel needs to rated on Tr… Randall Gellens
- Re: [89attendees] This hotel needs to rated on Tr… Charles Eckel (eckelcu)
- Re: [89attendees] This hotel needs to rated on Tr… Jared Mauch
- Re: [89attendees] This hotel needs to rated on Tr… Suhas Nandakumar (snandaku)
- Re: [89attendees] This hotel needs to rated on Tr… Matthew Kaufman (SKYPE)
- Re: [89attendees] experiences (was Re: This hotel… Olafur Gudmundsson
- Re: [89attendees] This hotel needs to rated on Tr… John G. Scudder
- Re: [89attendees] This hotel needs to rated on Tr… Mikael Abrahamsson
- Re: [89attendees] This hotel needs to rated on Tr… David C Lawrence
- Re: [89attendees] This hotel needs to rated on Tr… Randall Gellens
- Re: [89attendees] This hotel needs to rated on Tr… Randall Gellens
- Re: [89attendees] This hotel needs to rated on Tr… Hutton, Andrew
- Re: [89attendees] This hotel needs to rated on Tr… Tim Chown
- Re: [89attendees] This hotel needs to rated on Tr… Christian de Larrinaga
- Re: [89attendees] This hotel needs to rated on Tr… Jen Linkova
- Re: [89attendees] This hotel needs to rated on Tr… James Brister
- Re: [89attendees] This hotel needs to rated on Tr… Paul Coverdale
- Re: [89attendees] This hotel needs to rated on Tr… McDonald, Alex