Re: [89attendees] This hotel needs to rated on TripAdvisor
Christian de Larrinaga <cdel@firsthand.net> Wed, 05 March 2014 12:15 UTC
Return-Path: <cdel@firsthand.net>
X-Original-To: 89attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 89attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com
(Postfix) with ESMTP id 149A61A0424 for <89attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>;
Wed, 5 Mar 2014 04:15:16 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.286
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No,
score=-0.286 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9,
DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, HELO_MISMATCH_UK=1.749, HOST_MISMATCH_NET=0.311,
HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.547] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com
[127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id K65dOtCE8xz2 for
<89attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 5 Mar 2014 04:15:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: from bmtwo.vm.bytemark.co.uk (mail.firsthand.net [212.110.188.53])
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D65331A03F3 for
<89attendees@ietf.org>; Wed, 5 Mar 2014 04:15:13 -0800 (PST)
X-No-Relay: not in my network
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=default; d=firsthand.net;
b=KrG8baIO8q/BXjFbTrRG33FYhG6EXXFtI7XGO7nqN/0CdR08fRodaIbzxRfKqmTvYs3X6nhT5jGlQXBeDZ3QpDVnCtTe9HQQQE/jY0oYUurcymBpLH5lEvhfvK+sJ/v3;
h=X-No-Relay:X-No-Relay:Received:User-Agent:In-Reply-To:References:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Subject:From:Date:To:CC:Message-ID;
X-No-Relay: not in my network
X-No-Relay: not in my network
Received: from [10.254.221.154] (wifiadmin332.pndsl.co.uk [84.92.106.26]) by
bmtwo.vm.bytemark.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0BE23E0004;
Wed, 5 Mar 2014 12:15:06 +0000 (GMT)
User-Agent: K-9 Mail for Android
In-Reply-To: <EMEW3|8de9b7a04643cbf78d76e2af4bb65b87q24BNl03tjc|ecs.soton.ac.uk|10BF5694-26E4-46B3-B235-A429B49E3A05@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
References: <21271.1477.492929.367510@gro.dd.org>
<10BF5694-26E4-46B3-B235-A429B49E3A05@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
<EMEW3|8de9b7a04643cbf78d76e2af4bb65b87q24BNl03tjc|ecs.soton.ac.uk|10BF5694-26E4-46B3-B235-A429B49E3A05@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="----BNHTX1WVFP1D998662FMRO5BN1J3UC"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
From: Christian de Larrinaga <cdel@firsthand.net>
Date: Wed, 05 Mar 2014 12:14:50 +0000
To: Tim Chown <tjc@ecs.soton.ac.uk>,David C Lawrence <tale@akamai.com>
Message-ID: <2a1d65ad-95b5-4c9e-9522-c70e9f7220df@email.android.com>
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/89attendees/yHF4vtT5UO36WSgTOW8qY__f1gc
Cc: 89attendees@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [89attendees] This hotel needs to rated on TripAdvisor
X-BeenThere: 89attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Mailing list of IETF 89 attendees that have opted in to the list."
<89attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/89attendees>,
<mailto:89attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/89attendees/>
List-Post: <mailto:89attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:89attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/89attendees>,
<mailto:89attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Mar 2014 12:15:16 -0000
IETF turning RIPE.... ! On 5 March 2014 11:22:22 GMT+00:00, Tim Chown <tjc@ecs.soton.ac.uk> wrote: >On 5 Mar 2014, at 11:08, David C Lawrence <tale@akamai.com> wrote: > >> Thomas Herbst writes: >>> As a resident of the 9th floor of the tower, the biggest >disappointment >>> has been the lack of a functional network. >> >> Ditto this on sixth floor of Tower. I'd be unlikely to write a bad >> public review for the hotel even though I'm not in the apparently >> delightful West wing. My room is basically fine; I haven't even >> touched the thermostat and the shower temperature has been fair >> enough. > >Hi, > >Yes, the very poor WLAN in the hotel (as opposed to the very good one >in IETF areas), combined with the lack of hot water (in tower floor 10 >of hotel), means we’re missing a couple of rather desirable basics. > >Tim > >_______________________________________________ >89attendees mailing list >89attendees@ietf.org >https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/89attendees -- Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
- [89attendees] This hotel needs to rated on TripAd… Jethanandani, Mahesh
- Re: [89attendees] This hotel needs to rated on Tr… Peter Yee
- Re: [89attendees] This hotel needs to rated on Tr… John C Klensin
- Re: [89attendees] This hotel needs to rated on Tr… Ersue, Mehmet (NSN - DE/Munich)
- Re: [89attendees] This hotel needs to rated on Tr… Randall Gellens
- Re: [89attendees] This hotel needs to rated on Tr… Robert Moskowitz
- Re: [89attendees] This hotel needs to rated on Tr… Palanivelan Appanasamy
- Re: [89attendees] This hotel needs to rated on Tr… Tim Bray
- Re: [89attendees] This hotel needs to rated on Tr… Surendra Kumar (smkumar)
- Re: [89attendees] This hotel needs to rated on Tr… Adam Roach
- Re: [89attendees] This hotel needs to rated on Tr… N.Leymann
- Re: [89attendees] This hotel needs to rated on Tr… Ben Campbell
- Re: [89attendees] This hotel needs to rated on Tr… Thomas Herbst
- Re: [89attendees] This hotel needs to rated on Tr… Rosen, Brian
- [89attendees] experiences (was Re: This hotel nee… Andrew Sullivan
- Re: [89attendees] This hotel needs to rated on Tr… Randall Gellens
- Re: [89attendees] This hotel needs to rated on Tr… Charles Eckel (eckelcu)
- Re: [89attendees] This hotel needs to rated on Tr… Jared Mauch
- Re: [89attendees] This hotel needs to rated on Tr… Suhas Nandakumar (snandaku)
- Re: [89attendees] This hotel needs to rated on Tr… Matthew Kaufman (SKYPE)
- Re: [89attendees] experiences (was Re: This hotel… Olafur Gudmundsson
- Re: [89attendees] This hotel needs to rated on Tr… John G. Scudder
- Re: [89attendees] This hotel needs to rated on Tr… Mikael Abrahamsson
- Re: [89attendees] This hotel needs to rated on Tr… David C Lawrence
- Re: [89attendees] This hotel needs to rated on Tr… Randall Gellens
- Re: [89attendees] This hotel needs to rated on Tr… Randall Gellens
- Re: [89attendees] This hotel needs to rated on Tr… Hutton, Andrew
- Re: [89attendees] This hotel needs to rated on Tr… Tim Chown
- Re: [89attendees] This hotel needs to rated on Tr… Christian de Larrinaga
- Re: [89attendees] This hotel needs to rated on Tr… Jen Linkova
- Re: [89attendees] This hotel needs to rated on Tr… James Brister
- Re: [89attendees] This hotel needs to rated on Tr… Paul Coverdale
- Re: [89attendees] This hotel needs to rated on Tr… McDonald, Alex