Re: [91attendees] Room temperature?
Robert Kisteleki <robert@ripe.net> Mon, 10 November 2014 19:19 UTC
Return-Path: <robert@ripe.net>
X-Original-To: 91attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 91attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1])
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B13AB1AC3C2
for <91attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 10 Nov 2014 11:19:18 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.494
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.494 tagged_above=-999 required=5
tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.594] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44])
by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id NJcT0l-0kksM for <91attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>;
Mon, 10 Nov 2014 11:19:17 -0800 (PST)
Received: from koko.ripe.net (koko.ripe.net [IPv6:2001:67c:2e8:11::c100:1348])
(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256
bits)) (No client certificate requested)
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8782E1AC3EE
for <91attendees@ietf.org>; Mon, 10 Nov 2014 11:19:17 -0800 (PST)
Received: from nene.ripe.net ([193.0.23.10])
by koko.ripe.net with esmtps (UNKNOWN:AES256-GCM-SHA384:256)
(Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <robert@ripe.net>) id 1XnuUd-00023R-Cf
for 91attendees@ietf.org; Mon, 10 Nov 2014 20:19:16 +0100
Received: from gibbon.ripe.net ([2001:67c:2e8:1::c100:1ce] helo=[0.0.0.0])
by nene.ripe.net with esmtp (Exim 4.72)
(envelope-from <robert@ripe.net>) id 1XnuUc-0002Tv-LC
for 91attendees@ietf.org; Mon, 10 Nov 2014 20:19:15 +0100
Message-ID: <54610FAF.90104@ripe.net>
Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2014 09:19:11 -1000
From: Robert Kisteleki <robert@ripe.net>
Organization: RIPE NCC
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.9;
rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.2.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "<91attendees@ietf.org>" <91attendees@ietf.org>
References: <F3BDE86B-B479-4B19-BD0A-6026318E6A9A@muada.com>
<CAFU7BAQmmkmJd=qU+cH_EgaecjeJ7UGX0ovt1M2+hBGm+-9e2Q@mail.gmail.com>
<1F8A893B-9912-4CF6-B8D1-EEEA3B139A38@amsl.com>
<CAMeF8nBYFiEgA7NMe9rKpqRN=3_A900PQ=KxfoUE6V7GF=kGsA@mail.gmail.com>
<546018be.c70dc30a.1d45.621b@mx.google.com>
<89CE7254-98BB-45AE-8610-C02B52E93207@kerio.com>
<alpine.DEB.2.02.1411102002400.25356@uplift.swm.pp.se>
<40D13862-9A5E-47C4-BD98-5B481A2DA56F@puck.nether.net>
In-Reply-To: <40D13862-9A5E-47C4-BD98-5B481A2DA56F@puck.nether.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-RIPE-Spam-Level: ---
X-RIPE-Spam-Report: Spam Total Points: -3.5 points
pts rule name description
---- ---------------------- ------------------------------------
-1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP
-0.6 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain
-1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
[score: 0.0000]
X-RIPE-Signature: 72e00e6d7601fa19264e98abc238a274efef50690a032cff21f60309ed70c301
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/91attendees/3uXhjTLKvsoriIXGhqsKDAIMAxQ
Subject: Re: [91attendees] Room temperature?
X-BeenThere: 91attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Mailing list of IETF 91 attendees that have opted in on this list."
<91attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/91attendees>,
<mailto:91attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/91attendees/>
List-Post: <mailto:91attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:91attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/91attendees>,
<mailto:91attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2014 19:19:18 -0000
On 2014-11-10 9:12, Jared Mauch wrote: > This seems like operator error :-) > > Knowing that these places tend to have varying temperatures I packed accordingly. I believe the issue is more about the temperature difference between inside/outside. It's easy to dress up for freezing temperatures in the room if the outside is similar. That's not really the case here. Robert
- [91attendees] Room temperature? Iljitsch van Beijnum
- Re: [91attendees] Room temperature? Jen Linkova
- Re: [91attendees] Room temperature? Alexa Morris
- Re: [91attendees] Room temperature? Chris Morrow
- Re: [91attendees] Room temperature? Yoav Nir
- Re: [91attendees] Room temperature? Scott Weeks
- Re: [91attendees] Room temperature? Tomas Hnetila
- Re: [91attendees] Room temperature? Jéferson Campos Nobre
- Re: [91attendees] Room temperature? Benson Schliesser
- Re: [91attendees] Room temperature? Sean Leonard
- Re: [91attendees] Room temperature? Scott Weeks
- Re: [91attendees] Room temperature? Luigi Iannone
- Re: [91attendees] Room temperature? of oladipo
- Re: [91attendees] Room temperature? Mikael Abrahamsson
- Re: [91attendees] Room temperature? Jared Mauch
- Re: [91attendees] Room temperature? Robert Kisteleki
- Re: [91attendees] Room temperature? Vasily Dolmatov
- Re: [91attendees] Room temperature? R.Jesske
- [91attendees] Problem temp reports (was Re: Room … Andrew Sullivan
- Re: [91attendees] Room temperature? Iljitsch van Beijnum
- Re: [91attendees] Room temperature? Iljitsch van Beijnum
- Re: [91attendees] Room temperature? Marco Davids (SIDN)