Re: [91attendees] FW: Coffee brand?
Toerless Eckert <eckert@cisco.com> Fri, 14 November 2014 04:24 UTC
Return-Path: <eckert@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: 91attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 91attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1])
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C85841A003B
for <91attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 13 Nov 2014 20:24:01 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -15.095
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-15.095 tagged_above=-999 required=5
tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1,
DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.594,
SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44])
by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id 9t3njcgr8HDZ for <91attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>;
Thu, 13 Nov 2014 20:24:00 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rcdn-iport-1.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-1.cisco.com [173.37.86.72])
(using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D6DE81A6F04
for <91attendees@ietf.org>; Thu, 13 Nov 2014 20:23:59 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple;
d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=950; q=dns/txt; s=iport;
t=1415939040; x=1417148640;
h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:
mime-version:in-reply-to;
bh=EKB2zcbQOWqzx+ZsFS6r93ufMaTnZCNTp0GnquZSWyI=;
b=F+2ieTVjfMP9zlhuQ+qBQoUmSS0BHuZDxVOR0AXJXOTp3Sb5LAMOEysy
w51wR2As05QOSmLSJZVLeRwMP1WrQrgg1iKYph9It59yhmsCDpmn33mUS
wrgCAScU/79nX28UFVAAlhhCi8ZpR3OCJMYVi6dhups29QkRleK0qzAkW 0=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Ag8FAH+CZVStJV2Z/2dsb2JhbABBGoMOVVnNBYdOAoEiFgEBAQEBfYQCAQEBBDobJBALDgcDCSUPBToPE4hBDTjQRAEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAReRIgeDLYEeBYZAhVGSOgGBNJE8hAqEHRwwAROCNwEBAQ
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.07,383,1413244800"; d="scan'208";a="368976180"
Received: from rcdn-core-2.cisco.com ([173.37.93.153])
by rcdn-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP; 14 Nov 2014 04:24:00 +0000
Received: from mcast-linux1.cisco.com (mcast-linux1.cisco.com [172.27.244.121])
by rcdn-core-2.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id sAE4NwUi004049
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO);
Fri, 14 Nov 2014 04:23:59 GMT
Received: from mcast-linux1.cisco.com (localhost.cisco.com [127.0.0.1])
by mcast-linux1.cisco.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id sAE4NwSF031829;
Thu, 13 Nov 2014 20:23:58 -0800
Received: (from eckert@localhost)
by mcast-linux1.cisco.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) id sAE4Nw2D031828;
Thu, 13 Nov 2014 20:23:58 -0800
Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2014 20:23:58 -0800
From: Toerless Eckert <eckert@cisco.com>
To: Scott Weeks <surfer@mauigateway.com>
Message-ID: <20141114042357.GC28706@cisco.com>
References: <20141113185835.80FB347B@m0048140.ppops.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20141113185835.80FB347B@m0048140.ppops.net>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/91attendees/CtbSZcn5HZlHnLS4Qsv-xLnk1JU
Cc: 91attendees@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [91attendees] FW: Coffee brand?
X-BeenThere: 91attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Mailing list of IETF 91 attendees that have opted in on this list."
<91attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/91attendees>,
<mailto:91attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/91attendees/>
List-Post: <mailto:91attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:91attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/91attendees>,
<mailto:91attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2014 04:24:02 -0000
How about this context: Coffee tastes more like coffee when you expect it to be coffee and not an experience of a lifetime or something you paid through your nose for ;-) On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 06:58:35PM -0800, Scott Weeks wrote: > > > --- stefan.winter@restena.lu wrote: > From: Stefan Winter <stefan.winter@restena.lu> > > So I bought 10% Kona and also 100% Kona just to have samples of both. > ABC Store does not have the exact same vendor Hawaiian Paradise, so I > settled for some other Kona. Hoping that it turns out tasty when I'm > back home. After all, taste is also dependent on context, and being in > Hawaii certainly has the potential to bias the contextual experience to > the better. > ---------------------------------------------------- > > > Buy it online. For example: > > http://www.konamountaincoffee.com > > http://www.mountainthunder.com/view_product.php?product=AWANQCBV10 > > scott
- [91attendees] Coffee brand? Stefan Winter
- [91attendees] FW: Coffee brand? Hoang Pham (hoanpham)
- Re: [91attendees] FW: Coffee brand? Alexandre Petrescu
- Re: [91attendees] FW: Coffee brand? Stephen Botzko
- Re: [91attendees] FW: Coffee brand? Alan Whinery
- Re: [91attendees] FW: Coffee brand? Loa Andersson
- Re: [91attendees] FW: Coffee brand? ietf
- Re: [91attendees] FW: Coffee brand? Stefan Winter
- Re: [91attendees] FW: Coffee brand? John R Levine
- Re: [91attendees] FW: Coffee brand? Scott Weeks
- Re: [91attendees] FW: Coffee brand? Toerless Eckert