Re: [91attendees] Social event cost

ietf@johnlevine.com Sun, 16 November 2014 04:56 UTC

Return-Path: <johnl@iecc.com>
X-Original-To: 91attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 91attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A78431A6F59 for <91attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 15 Nov 2014 20:56:09 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.862
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.862 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_40=-0.001, HELO_MISMATCH_COM=0.553, HOST_MISMATCH_NET=0.311, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 02UTaT1w_QYr for <91attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 15 Nov 2014 20:56:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: from miucha.iecc.com (abusenet-1-pt.tunnel.tserv4.nyc4.ipv6.he.net [IPv6:2001:470:1f06:1126::2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DB2F41A0AFE for <91attendees@ietf.org>; Sat, 15 Nov 2014 20:56:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: (qmail 10229 invoked from network); 16 Nov 2014 04:56:06 -0000
Received: from miucha.iecc.com (64.57.183.18) by mail1.iecc.com with QMQP; 16 Nov 2014 04:56:06 -0000
Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2014 04:55:44 -0000
Message-ID: <20141116045544.12140.qmail@ary.lan>
From: ietf@johnlevine.com
To: 91attendees@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <alpine.OSX.2.01.1411152023070.1294@173-11-110-132-sfba.hfc.comcastbusiness.net>
Organization:
X-Headerized: yes
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/91attendees/E7yORojyYlMqnB14QBY4k8loxlA
Cc: olejacobsen@me.com
Subject: Re: [91attendees] Social event cost
X-BeenThere: 91attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Mailing list of IETF 91 attendees that have opted in on this list." <91attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/91attendees>, <mailto:91attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/91attendees/>
List-Post: <mailto:91attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:91attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/91attendees>, <mailto:91attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2014 04:56:09 -0000

In article <alpine.OSX.2.01.1411152023070.1294@173-11-110-132-sfba.hfc.comcastbusiness.net> you write:
>
>Nope. Different Luau. The one in your link is the rooftop
>version, not the sit down dinner on the Great Lawn.

This suggests it's really the same thing.  The New Years Eve edition
is on the great lawn, and still is only $116:

http://www.hawaiidiscount.com/oahu/luaus/hilton-waikiki-starlight.htm

>> If the IETF and/or sponsors paid $200/seat for the luau,
>> it's hard to avoid the conclusion that someone got ripped off.
>> 
>> PS: a little googlage suggests that $100/ticket is a typical price
>> for luaus all over Hawaii.