Re: [91attendees] IETF Fee increase alternatives
David Conrad <david.conrad@icann.org> Sat, 15 November 2014 08:14 UTC
Return-Path: <david.conrad@icann.org>
X-Original-To: 91attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 91attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EDE461A1B86 for <91attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 15 Nov 2014 00:14:29 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.194
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.194 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, J_CHICKENPOX_22=0.6, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.594, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id RF57rANekoJH for <91attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 15 Nov 2014 00:14:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: from out.west.pexch112.icann.org (pfe112-ca-2.pexch112.icann.org [64.78.40.10]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 220B11A1AF3 for <91attendees@ietf.org>; Sat, 15 Nov 2014 00:14:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: from PMBX112-W1-CA-1.pexch112.icann.org (64.78.40.21) by PMBX112-W1-CA-2.pexch112.icann.org (64.78.40.23) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.847.32; Sat, 15 Nov 2014 00:14:23 -0800
Received: from PMBX112-W1-CA-1.pexch112.icann.org ([64.78.40.21]) by PMBX112-W1-CA-1.PEXCH112.ICANN.ORG ([64.78.40.21]) with mapi id 15.00.0847.030; Sat, 15 Nov 2014 00:14:23 -0800
From: David Conrad <david.conrad@icann.org>
To: Alan Whinery <whinery@hawaii.edu>
Thread-Topic: [91attendees] IETF Fee increase alternatives
Thread-Index: AQHP/7+NkCdD83SZY0qGZ61fHhLS65xgDuGAgADsuACAAA6SgIAAC4WAgAAM5QCAAAENgIAAFGyAgAADsICAABPUgIAAj1yA
Date: Sat, 15 Nov 2014 08:14:23 +0000
Message-ID: <22A64C1D-6B2E-4577-B789-C4DAB3769BF0@icann.org>
References: <CB79E3A1-A560-41A3-90CF-E1302AC6997E@bangj.com> <F4CB1B4F-5681-47B8-B522-2C1CFE8989F6@gmail.com> <F96AFD65-DE2A-4A5A-B058-D0B96D96260F@puck.nether.net> <546658E3.2040500@rrbone.net> <1EBC33C7-E093-4166-AA06-95B030AC99C7@cisco.com> <8DE7E39C-5D9E-4D08-BD91-2188D23A0E8D@gmail.com> <20141114210358.GJ3008@mx1.yitter.info>, <alpine.OSX.2.01.1411141416220.20939@173-11-110-132-sfba.hfc.comcastbusiness.net> <4jito6ylawr1nt653b1uraor.1416004085715@email.android.com> <5466931B.7030009@hawaii.edu>
In-Reply-To: <5466931B.7030009@hawaii.edu>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: yes
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [66.75.112.134]
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_F1383FB9-8C2C-471A-BCFB-C790A52EC5CC"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha512"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/91attendees/RPLWgIPs7XdDCYCkNnph5Yky-SE
Cc: IETF 91 Attendees <91attendees@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [91attendees] IETF Fee increase alternatives
X-BeenThere: 91attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Mailing list of IETF 91 attendees that have opted in on this list." <91attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/91attendees>, <mailto:91attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/91attendees/>
List-Post: <mailto:91attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:91attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/91attendees>, <mailto:91attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 15 Nov 2014 08:14:30 -0000
Alan, Thanks for the aloha and all the useful information and advice! Regards, -drc On Nov 14, 2014, at 1:41 PM, Alan Whinery <whinery@hawaii.edu> wrote: > You are all, of course, welcome to come back, as is IETF, but this place you have visited isn't a resident's usual experience of Hawaii, or even of Honolulu. > > I'm thinking that the next iteration of Hawaii IETF should be based on more of a Burning Man model, and we should pot-luck a meal with things carried from the 4 corners of the world (which I realize is not a cube, as such), and have a proper lu'au /ho'olaulea for a social event. > > But still, I agree, t-shirts could be green or blue, or something. > > Safe travels. > > -Alan > (one of about 6(?) local residents who attended) > > On 11/14/2014 12:30 PM, Toerless Eckert (eckert) wrote: >> 2030 nerds in paradise 3.0 >> Paradise is overprice' >> >> >> Sent from my Samsung Captivate Glide on AT&T >> >> Ole Jacobsen <olejacobsen@me.com> wrote: >> >> T-shirts, I'm telling you! >> >> Price them at $50 and get a bunch of idiots like me to work the >> project :-) >> >> >> Ole J. Jacobsen >> Editor and Publisher >> The Internet Protocol Journal >> Office: +1 415-550-9433 >> Cell: +1 415-370-4628 >> UK Cell: +44 7805 977889 >> docomo: (090) 3337-9311 >> Web: protocoljournal.org >> E-mail: olejacobsen@me.com >> E-mail: ole@protocoljournal.org >> Skype: organdemo >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> 91attendees mailing list >> 91attendees@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/91attendees >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> 91attendees mailing list >> 91attendees@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/91attendees > > _______________________________________________ > 91attendees mailing list > 91attendees@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/91attendees
- [91attendees] IETF Fee increase alternatives Tom Pusateri
- Re: [91attendees] IETF Fee increase alternatives Jon Hudson
- Re: [91attendees] IETF Fee increase alternatives Toerless Eckert
- Re: [91attendees] IETF Fee increase alternatives Bob Hinden
- Re: [91attendees] IETF Fee increase alternatives Iljitsch van Beijnum
- Re: [91attendees] IETF Fee increase alternatives Iljitsch van Beijnum
- Re: [91attendees] IETF Fee increase alternatives Daniel Jewell
- Re: [91attendees] IETF Fee increase alternatives Tom Pusateri
- Re: [91attendees] IETF Fee increase alternatives Livingood, Jason
- Re: [91attendees] IETF Fee increase alternatives Ray Pelletier
- Re: [91attendees] IETF Fee increase alternatives Jared Mauch
- Re: [91attendees] IETF Fee increase alternatives Michael Richardson
- Re: [91attendees] IETF Fee increase alternatives Michael Richardson
- Re: [91attendees] IETF Fee increase alternatives Dominik Bay
- Re: [91attendees] IETF Fee increase alternatives Fred Baker (fred)
- Re: [91attendees] IETF Fee increase alternatives Jon Hudson
- Re: [91attendees] IETF Fee increase alternatives Andrew Sullivan
- Re: [91attendees] IETF Fee increase alternatives DRAGE, Keith (Keith)
- Re: [91attendees] IETF Fee increase alternatives Jon Hudson
- Re: [91attendees] IETF Fee increase alternatives Eggert, Lars
- Re: [91attendees] IETF Fee increase alternatives ietf
- Re: [91attendees] IETF Fee increase alternatives Ole Jacobsen
- Re: [91attendees] IETF Fee increase alternatives Toerless Eckert (eckert)
- Re: [91attendees] IETF Fee increase alternatives Voyer, Daniel (520309)
- Re: [91attendees] IETF Fee increase alternatives Ray Pelletier
- Re: [91attendees] IETF Fee increase alternatives Livingood, Jason
- Re: [91attendees] IETF Fee increase alternatives Alan Whinery
- Re: [91attendees] IETF Fee increase alternatives Ray Pelletier
- Re: [91attendees] IETF Fee increase alternatives David Conrad
- Re: [91attendees] IETF Fee increase alternatives Alan Whinery