IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [91attendees] IETF Hams list.

Stewart Bryant <stbryant@cisco.com> Tue, 04 November 2014 09:29 UTC

Return-Path: <stbryant@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: 91attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 91attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8A1A1A0A6B for <91attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 4 Nov 2014 01:29:48 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -15.094
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-15.094 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.594, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HabdEmhqDg-3 for <91attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 4 Nov 2014 01:29:46 -0800 (PST)
Received: from alln-iport-6.cisco.com (alln-iport-6.cisco.com [173.37.142.93]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8CAEB1A03E3 for <91attendees@ietf.org>; Tue, 4 Nov 2014 01:29:46 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=7025; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1415093387; x=1416302987; h=message-id:date:from:reply-to:mime-version:to:cc:subject: references:in-reply-to; bh=P2fpTvT1mc33UFbj4kiOAwgEyeic/Eftht+0EMTtRGw=; b=DOtzvbo5znMP02wlAWP1BBbuKlNEEcSDQEljl5SDS3Em/Tr8mcdNnn1V S4K4U9MYGEMHM32RNGGVuuzGU+Nvc09pIfSLVAhaF5evhkUQLYv1bUO57 /bGdnoh2qKcCpdu2BvgfoBLoH52rcfY4xstFw5Dqhsy5oS8qNR1rsUM8s g=;
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos; i="5.07,312,1413244800"; d="scan'208,217"; a="93134344"
Received: from alln-core-2.cisco.com ([173.36.13.135]) by alln-iport-6.cisco.com with ESMTP; 04 Nov 2014 09:29:45 +0000
Received: from [10.61.69.49] (ams3-vpn-dhcp1329.cisco.com [10.61.69.49]) by alln-core-2.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id sA49ThSb012788; Tue, 4 Nov 2014 09:29:43 GMT
Message-ID: <54589C86.8040903@cisco.com>
Date: Tue, 04 Nov 2014 09:29:42 +0000
From: Stewart Bryant <stbryant@cisco.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.9; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Colin Doyle <cdoyle@verilan.com>, Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net>
References: <CAHw9_iJgWDRt=UEqOn7EZO3gaJLoq4RLPW6UtgnXCoF+O1mTMA@mail.gmail.com> <CACbUdyq7YRAdk-p6VHOK08Be9WHSngLui9P_rTW0O67uS6_Qvg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CACbUdyq7YRAdk-p6VHOK08Be9WHSngLui9P_rTW0O67uS6_Qvg@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------060509080006090603010901"
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/91attendees/Rr1G5UcLr0JRam_2aGrOR2-QkwQ
Cc: 91attendees@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [91attendees] IETF Hams list.
X-BeenThere: 91attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: stbryant@cisco.com
List-Id: "Mailing list of IETF 91 attendees that have opted in on this list." <91attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/91attendees>, <mailto:91attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/91attendees/>
List-Post: <mailto:91attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:91attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/91attendees>, <mailto:91attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Nov 2014 09:29:48 -0000

I have met more radio amateurs at IETF than I ever did at ITU.

Stewart/G3YSX/AF6XD

On 04/11/2014 01:54, Colin Doyle wrote:
>
> There's got to be at least a few folks from the ITU at theses things, 
> right?
>
> C
>
> -- 
>
> Colin Doyle
> Networking Fellow
> Verilan, Inc.
> 7327 SW Barnes Rd. #215
> Portland, OR 97225
>
> +1 503.810.2129 [mobile]
> cdoyle@verilan.com <mailto:cdoyle@verilan.com> [email]
> cdoyle.verilan [skype]
> www.verilan.com <http://www.verilan.com> [website]
>
> On Nov 3, 2014 3:45 PM, "Warren Kumari" <warren@kumari.net 
> <mailto:warren@kumari.net>> wrote:
>
>     Hi all,
>
>     Apologies for the noise - if you are not an Amateur Radio person, feel
>     free to stop reading now...
>
>     There is a large overlap between engineers (network folk in
>     particular) and HAM radio operators. There are a number of us who
>     bring our HTs along to many meetings, and plan to operate[0].
>     We have a (very low volume) list of ietf ham folk, called,
>     unsurprisingly, ietf-hams.
>
>     IETF-hams@snozzages.com <mailto:IETF-hams@snozzages.com>
>     http://snozzages.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ietf-hams
>
>     If you are not a US licensed ham, see:
>     http://www.arrl.org/foreign-licenses-operating-in-u-s
>
>
>     Come join us, and bring yer radio to Hawaii.
>
>     73,
>     W
>
>     --
>     I don't think the execution is relevant when it was obviously a bad
>     idea in the first place.
>     This is like putting rabid weasels in your pants, and later expressing
>     regret at having chosen those particular rabid weasels and that pair
>     of pants.
>        ---maf
>
>     _______________________________________________
>     91attendees mailing list
>     91attendees@ietf.org <mailto:91attendees@ietf.org>
>     https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/91attendees
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> 91attendees mailing list
> 91attendees@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/91attendees


-- 
For corporate legal information go to:

http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/index.html

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email