Re: [91attendees] FW: Coffee brand?

Stefan Winter <stefan.winter@restena.lu> Fri, 14 November 2014 00:06 UTC

Return-Path: <stefan.winter@restena.lu>
X-Original-To: 91attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 91attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1DC721A0047 for <91attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 13 Nov 2014 16:06:44 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.206
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.206 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.8, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.594] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kgE9sXvBGONF for <91attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 13 Nov 2014 16:06:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtp.restena.lu (legolas.restena.lu [158.64.1.34]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A61131A000B for <91attendees@ietf.org>; Thu, 13 Nov 2014 16:06:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: from viper.local (unknown [158.64.15.196]) by smtp.restena.lu (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id CD62A80E31; Fri, 14 Nov 2014 01:06:34 +0100 (CET)
Message-ID: <54654782.2030908@restena.lu>
Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2014 01:06:26 +0100
From: Stefan Winter <stefan.winter@restena.lu>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.10; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.2.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: ietf@johnlevine.com, 91attendees@ietf.org
References: <20141113212624.8278.qmail@ary.lan>
In-Reply-To: <20141113212624.8278.qmail@ary.lan>
OpenPGP: id=8A39DC66
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="lpvetHIGS4svAekJJaHtWWUO11ITgQchW"
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/91attendees/iAhDCP2Q9HevRm3I4DXuOT77JC8
Cc: loa@pi.nu
Subject: Re: [91attendees] FW: Coffee brand?
X-BeenThere: 91attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Mailing list of IETF 91 attendees that have opted in on this list." <91attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/91attendees>, <mailto:91attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/91attendees/>
List-Post: <mailto:91attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:91attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/91attendees>, <mailto:91attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2014 00:06:44 -0000

Hi,

>> However I took a tour last Friday, and the guide told us that Hawaii is
>> the furthest from the Equator that they grow coffee. Quite a bit of
>> industry here.
> Just goes to show, you shouldn't believe everything a tour guide tells
> you.  Hawaii is about 21 N latitude, while Paran� in Brazil is about
> 24 S, and grows vast amounts of coffee.  This may be the farthest
> north that anyone grows coffee commercially, although there is coffee
> grown in Veracruz, Mexico, which may be slightly farther north.
>
> I agree that the hotel coffee is quite good, but I would be pretty
> surprised if it contained any beans grown in Hawaii.  Coffee from Kona
> is very expensive, like two or three times coffee from other places.
> If there were any local beans in the coffee, there would be large
> signs saying Kona and it would cost extra.
>

I got an off-list reply with much more in-depth insights. Not sure why
the person didn't go on-list, so let the name remain a mystery, but for
all the coffee lovers I'm spoiling the actual info now:

"The coffee that the hotel uses is in concentrate liquid form for high volume dispensing machines.

Decaf brand is Javo, house blend.
Regular coffee is Hawaiian Paradise Coffee Company, Kona blend, www.hawaiianparadisecoffee.com"


Visiting that website suggests that this must be the *10%* Kona blend.
So the coffee seems to actually contain traces of Kona, even if there
are no big signs around it.

So I bought 10% Kona and also 100% Kona just to have samples of both.
ABC Store does not have the exact same vendor Hawaiian Paradise, so I
settled for some other Kona. Hoping that it turns out tasty when I'm
back home. After all, taste is also dependent on context, and being in
Hawaii certainly has the potential to bias the contextual experience to
the better.

If someone finds "Hawaiian Paradise" shops nearby, I'm happy to take advice.
Stefan