[91attendees] IETF Hams list.
Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net> Tue, 04 November 2014 01:45 UTC
Return-Path: <warren@kumari.net>
X-Original-To: 91attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 91attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1])
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14BF81A1B65
for <91attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 3 Nov 2014 17:45:06 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.978
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.978 tagged_above=-999 required=5
tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7]
autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44])
by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id HAmmdzkqVxGB for <91attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>;
Mon, 3 Nov 2014 17:45:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-wg0-f47.google.com (mail-wg0-f47.google.com [74.125.82.47])
(using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5C1BE1A1B55
for <91attendees@ietf.org>; Mon, 3 Nov 2014 17:45:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-wg0-f47.google.com with SMTP id a1so12457710wgh.34
for <91attendees@ietf.org>; Mon, 03 Nov 2014 17:45:02 -0800 (PST)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to
:content-type;
bh=jM9vvqPmI6z8/G2Eo1Tny8BAd8hCir1lZ7P3NxQZtd4=;
b=EJuRK+DLn3exfHQXKMI5tV9tvgK3HHempAgwKw7tPmKVY5gmakxfIZ3f+Ub7fIAipF
kacRyu5aQWZZgkC+1C7qvxo9lkQCBzX9co5pfSzlYbdilZhFQI0O8v49qNIbSl0iBOSO
Pbg8oLZVrY6lBK4kbO1SX6S5e1LMR3IjEz/2la+CGpLk1rXgB/A5M/pd0uE1cLxL2M0k
eL2fPI4fWN+H/xZ6KmLipPX0tfgyZ3oEjrJxPqJPTCVY7wWShKWB8YNoHQZPR7neBbcn
zwXVF177Pd8VPlKmt3Ke34Y9TSsB5i3r4iHHfC8SJxf++qdlCXsk9pFzUPvydf34baed
mI1A==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnhKe/yqr9l4hqTGDxZSDmj7YftqrtoiAfYII0GiYLC5H5MSeaz5UjbSlvWTmQ7V51NBzRs
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.194.71.6 with SMTP id q6mr13516399wju.98.1415065502836; Mon,
03 Nov 2014 17:45:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.194.77.134 with HTTP; Mon, 3 Nov 2014 17:45:02 -0800 (PST)
Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2014 20:45:02 -0500
Message-ID: <CAHw9_iJgWDRt=UEqOn7EZO3gaJLoq4RLPW6UtgnXCoF+O1mTMA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net>
To: 91attendees@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/91attendees/iVqxUS6wrtNOgzhwI9-at8Eeh7g
Subject: [91attendees] IETF Hams list.
X-BeenThere: 91attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Mailing list of IETF 91 attendees that have opted in on this list."
<91attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/91attendees>,
<mailto:91attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/91attendees/>
List-Post: <mailto:91attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:91attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/91attendees>,
<mailto:91attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Nov 2014 01:45:06 -0000
Hi all, Apologies for the noise - if you are not an Amateur Radio person, feel free to stop reading now... There is a large overlap between engineers (network folk in particular) and HAM radio operators. There are a number of us who bring our HTs along to many meetings, and plan to operate[0]. We have a (very low volume) list of ietf ham folk, called, unsurprisingly, ietf-hams. IETF-hams@snozzages.com http://snozzages.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ietf-hams If you are not a US licensed ham, see: http://www.arrl.org/foreign-licenses-operating-in-u-s Come join us, and bring yer radio to Hawaii. 73, W -- I don't think the execution is relevant when it was obviously a bad idea in the first place. This is like putting rabid weasels in your pants, and later expressing regret at having chosen those particular rabid weasels and that pair of pants. ---maf
- [91attendees] IETF Hams list. Warren Kumari
- Re: [91attendees] IETF Hams list. Colin Doyle
- Re: [91attendees] IETF Hams list. Antonio Querubin
- Re: [91attendees] IETF Hams list. Stewart Bryant