[92hackathon] FW: SFC Traceroute

"Reinaldo Penno (repenno)" <repenno@cisco.com> Mon, 23 March 2015 23:08 UTC

Return-Path: <repenno@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: 92hackathon@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 92hackathon@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 484321A0370 for <92hackathon@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 23 Mar 2015 16:08:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.511
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.511 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id pzls9XjVxvyR for <92hackathon@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 23 Mar 2015 16:08:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-1.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-1.cisco.com [173.37.86.72]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EE4CD1A0187 for <92hackathon@ietf.org>; Mon, 23 Mar 2015 16:07:13 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1424; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1427152034; x=1428361634; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:references:in-reply-to: content-id:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=G8hebIK4ejBi3yfckYks9gZaaEh0Ym1GAEKj/s0JR9M=; b=MRVbcYNuoHzQKtd4M6gXf96723RN3W13Bm81kaXFJ6TaBC89PyyMmTcu mPQTUDkzZ55SViElTCdvRs9voJmNqUDf85NbaOh+C7HbefTKLx4mKk1e2 olS4FK2Wfg6bdMkG4tu54uNAthNQSvgjtOsTMXtJXDADlplq7Qbig12Bi o=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0A7BQAtnBBV/5BdJa1cgwZSVQUExk+FdQKBLkwBAQEBAQF9hBUBAQQ6TwIBCDYQMhsBBgMCBBMJiCYIBchYAQEBAQEFAQEBAQEBHIshhHyELQWQT4NvhX+BGzqCdo9fIoNubwGBQ38BAQE
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.11,455,1422921600"; d="scan'208";a="402955047"
Received: from rcdn-core-8.cisco.com ([173.37.93.144]) by rcdn-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP; 23 Mar 2015 23:07:13 +0000
Received: from xhc-rcd-x13.cisco.com (xhc-rcd-x13.cisco.com [173.37.183.87]) by rcdn-core-8.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id t2NN7DTk000944 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL) for <92hackathon@ietf.org>; Mon, 23 Mar 2015 23:07:13 GMT
Received: from xmb-rcd-x04.cisco.com ([169.254.8.114]) by xhc-rcd-x13.cisco.com ([173.37.183.87]) with mapi id 14.03.0195.001; Mon, 23 Mar 2015 18:07:13 -0500
From: "Reinaldo Penno (repenno)" <repenno@cisco.com>
To: "92hackathon@ietf.org" <92hackathon@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: SFC Traceroute
Thread-Index: AQHQZb3rjJcOOUoim0SjDGde3At9b50qsLQA
Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2015 23:07:12 +0000
Message-ID: <D136068B.DB67%repenno@cisco.com>
References: <D136064A.DB64%repenno@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <D136064A.DB64%repenno@cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.4.8.150116
x-originating-ip: [10.24.66.142]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <8A7E5C5D0F84BD4588A8E893BE6E89F0@emea.cisco.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/92hackathon/FrtTMG8sxXVcnlBkQhmGKpj2m24>
Subject: [92hackathon] FW: SFC Traceroute
X-BeenThere: 92hackathon@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF 92 Hackathon <92hackathon.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/92hackathon>, <mailto:92hackathon-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/92hackathon/>
List-Post: <mailto:92hackathon@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:92hackathon-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/92hackathon>, <mailto:92hackathon-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2015 23:08:03 -0000

Thanks to the folk that tested it. The bug found was fixed here:

https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/#/c/16974/

Regards,

Reinaldo

On 3/23/15, 6:05 PM, "Reinaldo Penno (repenno)" <repenno@cisco.com> wrote:

>New version of SFC Traceroute.
>
>Thanks to those in the hackathon that tested it.
>
>
>On 3/23/15, 6:03 PM, "internet-drafts@ietf.org" <internet-drafts@ietf.org>
>wrote:
>
>>
>>A new version of I-D, draft-penno-sfc-trace-02.txt
>>has been successfully submitted by Reinaldo Penno and posted to the
>>IETF repository.
>>
>>Name:		draft-penno-sfc-trace
>>Revision:	02
>>Title:		Services Function Chaining Traceroute
>>Document date:	2015-03-23
>>Group:		Individual Submission
>>Pages:		9
>>URL:            
>>http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-penno-sfc-trace-02.txt
>>Status:         https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-penno-sfc-trace/
>>Htmlized:       http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-penno-sfc-trace-02
>>Diff:           http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-penno-sfc-trace-02
>>
>>Abstract:
>>   This document defines a protocol that checks the liveness and report
>>   the service-hops of a service path. .
>>
>>
>>                 
>>        
>>
>>
>>Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of
>>submission
>>until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.
>>
>>The IETF Secretariat
>>
>