Re: [92hackathon] FW: SFC Traceroute

"Charles Eckel (eckelcu)" <eckelcu@cisco.com> Mon, 23 March 2015 23:26 UTC

Return-Path: <eckelcu@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: 92hackathon@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 92hackathon@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 324CB1A1B9E for <92hackathon@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 23 Mar 2015 16:26:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.511
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.511 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PMgV5tjlp9OC for <92hackathon@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 23 Mar 2015 16:26:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from alln-iport-8.cisco.com (alln-iport-8.cisco.com [173.37.142.95]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A8C0B1A1B44 for <92hackathon@ietf.org>; Mon, 23 Mar 2015 16:26:19 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1849; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1427153179; x=1428362779; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:content-id: content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=MgukWLssuAzcTyD3s/xi0hXiaQOpDc2nHWO+888zkfo=; b=aazV6x2ec74wiT+Q3C48NVlcVubXzDWseSwZ7WhCl+3REE9w6r2yrs9j c7zd/WwNr9YSjF6TCCrHgFwNl5OZ8Ia/HySo87UH5w4jMicsWnIP+6iE/ 91xd/vAXJT/lIxhq2qaayUw2j9eFuA27lRKNNnq9usgW1bBS9luP1FG+A M=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0DsBABUoBBV/5BdJa1cgwZSVQUExH+BRQqFLIF5OBQBAQEBAQEBfIQUAQEBBAEBATc0HQEIGB43CxwLBAESCYgmCAXIWwEBAQcBAQEBAQEciyGJKQWQT4NuhX+BGzqCdo9eIoNubwGBQ38BAQE
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.11,455,1422921600"; d="scan'208";a="134648717"
Received: from rcdn-core-8.cisco.com ([173.37.93.144]) by alln-iport-8.cisco.com with ESMTP; 23 Mar 2015 23:26:18 +0000
Received: from xhc-aln-x11.cisco.com (xhc-aln-x11.cisco.com [173.36.12.85]) by rcdn-core-8.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id t2NNQIoK016042 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL) for <92hackathon@ietf.org>; Mon, 23 Mar 2015 23:26:18 GMT
Received: from xmb-aln-x08.cisco.com ([169.254.3.45]) by xhc-aln-x11.cisco.com ([173.36.12.85]) with mapi id 14.03.0195.001; Mon, 23 Mar 2015 18:26:18 -0500
From: "Charles Eckel (eckelcu)" <eckelcu@cisco.com>
To: "Reinaldo Penno (repenno)" <repenno@cisco.com>, "92hackathon@ietf.org" <92hackathon@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [92hackathon] FW: SFC Traceroute
Thread-Index: AQHQZcDDRND4jaQl1UegL5gvQKZs/Q==
Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2015 23:26:18 +0000
Message-ID: <D1360AFD.43733%eckelcu@cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.4.8.150116
x-originating-ip: [10.24.136.80]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <B5615DC262F4144C83FFD9CA56229F12@emea.cisco.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/92hackathon/aaT5i393J1fH1ADUNXAkAf3jsNw>
Subject: Re: [92hackathon] FW: SFC Traceroute
X-BeenThere: 92hackathon@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF 92 Hackathon <92hackathon.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/92hackathon>, <mailto:92hackathon-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/92hackathon/>
List-Post: <mailto:92hackathon@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:92hackathon-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/92hackathon>, <mailto:92hackathon-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2015 23:26:21 -0000

Another great example of hackathon speeding IETF standards work. Thanks to
those who found, fixed, and shared.

Cheers,
Charles

On 3/23/15, 6:07 PM, "Reinaldo Penno (repenno)" <repenno@cisco.com> wrote:

>Thanks to the folk that tested it. The bug found was fixed here:
>
>https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/#/c/16974/
>
>Regards,
>
>Reinaldo
>
>On 3/23/15, 6:05 PM, "Reinaldo Penno (repenno)" <repenno@cisco.com> wrote:
>
>>New version of SFC Traceroute.
>>
>>Thanks to those in the hackathon that tested it.
>>
>>
>>On 3/23/15, 6:03 PM, "internet-drafts@ietf.org"
>><internet-drafts@ietf.org>
>>wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>A new version of I-D, draft-penno-sfc-trace-02.txt
>>>has been successfully submitted by Reinaldo Penno and posted to the
>>>IETF repository.
>>>
>>>Name:		draft-penno-sfc-trace
>>>Revision:	02
>>>Title:		Services Function Chaining Traceroute
>>>Document date:	2015-03-23
>>>Group:		Individual Submission
>>>Pages:		9
>>>URL:            
>>>http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-penno-sfc-trace-02.txt
>>>Status:         https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-penno-sfc-trace/
>>>Htmlized:       http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-penno-sfc-trace-02
>>>Diff:           
>>>http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-penno-sfc-trace-02
>>>
>>>Abstract:
>>>   This document defines a protocol that checks the liveness and report
>>>   the service-hops of a service path. .
>>>
>>>
>>>                
>>>        
>>>
>>>
>>>Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of
>>>submission
>>>until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.
>>>
>>>The IETF Secretariat
>>>
>>
>
>_______________________________________________
>92hackathon mailing list
>92hackathon@ietf.org
>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/92hackathon