Re: [93attendees] so, was there any crime?

Jared Mauch <jared@puck.nether.net> Mon, 27 July 2015 17:33 UTC

Return-Path: <jared@puck.nether.net>
X-Original-To: 93attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 93attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E75B1B30EB for <93attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 27 Jul 2015 10:33:18 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.912
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.912 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, GB_AFFORDABLE=1, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id L11odPIR_qqk for <93attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 27 Jul 2015 10:33:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from puck.nether.net (puck.nether.net [IPv6:2001:418:3f4::5]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8839D1B30E4 for <93attendees@ietf.org>; Mon, 27 Jul 2015 10:33:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.142.123.99] (unknown [166.170.21.239]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by puck.nether.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 78698540740; Mon, 27 Jul 2015 13:33:15 -0400 (EDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
From: Jared Mauch <jared@puck.nether.net>
X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (12H143)
In-Reply-To: <55B66960.4090008@bwijnen.net>
Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2015 13:33:13 -0400
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <10AC7AFB-8D94-4E99-AAFD-F287570AAECC@puck.nether.net>
References: <CAD62q9UkFF2hxNZ++ec15BpaOBZX6Z7Di+F=KsEtBsL0ucvb2w@mail.gmail.com> <21942.16255.474612.347992@tale.kendall.corp.akamai.com> <55B66960.4090008@bwijnen.net>
To: "Bert Wijnen (IETF)" <bwietf@bwijnen.net>
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/93attendees/-e9tPnOEsvoqyK0f5ZMPiW99SUU>
Cc: David C Lawrence <tale@akamai.com>, "93attendees@ietf.org" <93attendees@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [93attendees] so, was there any crime?
X-BeenThere: 93attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Mailing list of IETF 93 attendees that have opted in on this list. " <93attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/93attendees>, <mailto:93attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/93attendees/>
List-Post: <mailto:93attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:93attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/93attendees>, <mailto:93attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2015 17:33:18 -0000

My experience was the opposite. Hotel taxi charged less to get to a venue than the return trip. Maybe I was super cheated but either way it was affordable and they issued receipts. 

I had a hard time getting a return taxi so when he offered a rate that was higher than expected it didn't seem to be horrible vs waking many km while tired. It seemed to be in line with other large cities but high for what I saw in the local market. 

As always YMMV etc. seems like the super majority had a great time and good experience. 

Jared Mauch

> On Jul 27, 2015, at 1:24 PM, Bert Wijnen (IETF) <bwietf@bwijnen.net> wrote:
> 
> 
> I then noticed that when taking a hotel taxi you were 100% sure to be cheated
> or taken advantage of.