Re: [93attendees] IETF dress code policy

Kathleen Moriarty <kathleen.moriarty.ietf@gmail.com> Fri, 24 July 2015 10:58 UTC

Return-Path: <kathleen.moriarty.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: 93attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 93attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A5A41A86FD for <93attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 24 Jul 2015 03:58:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.399
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.399 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, J_CHICKENPOX_45=0.6, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 11Se5QQYnlLJ for <93attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 24 Jul 2015 03:58:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wi0-x22c.google.com (mail-wi0-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c05::22c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BD4FE1A8F3C for <93attendees@ietf.org>; Fri, 24 Jul 2015 03:58:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by wibxm9 with SMTP id xm9so22675729wib.1 for <93attendees@ietf.org>; Fri, 24 Jul 2015 03:58:00 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=so4t0xVmqNUJpN69ZTuvTNBESi/FD22NjNuKhZ3ApRE=; b=D214RjkvLHs+klA6l/P5O50sLdbUyvLk4satYo6aId+s80ifn4J2Wc/ZC1tI2heGNO XW7IzLD0y0DCNKvc2yXlGRuy9GKLLdt0U7AhbTtZsHB7Op1Nfa8rsRLjqNAQh5bPgTDh ms9lCpKNhEBz+Pzfc3YZoP4+hl4N33+pfBW0JGhMEkpA82JYkCDuYgIYVRMreiZsNDPg JFBUcqEEwjGlR+zuRGY4okBybEdpJ8+BZzpYwEKGnhxD4EcWvuNX4WzBtlMMXvSBF+R8 F9x1pc22jaOTM5miG9e+tQM2YV9higuZ/lRqqC9Ep53C76FmHaat+DhyjrJcwmy3jroS 3lRg==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.194.75.132 with SMTP id c4mr24680459wjw.80.1437735480535; Fri, 24 Jul 2015 03:58:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.28.31.194 with HTTP; Fri, 24 Jul 2015 03:58:00 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <55B218DB.6010603@cs.tcd.ie>
References: <28B1F49A-AAE4-429F-B70E-6783040FE829@spirent.com> <BN1PR06MB4371C7F6FE511FAD63C2FE8A8810@BN1PR06MB437.namprd06.prod.outlook.com> <55B218DB.6010603@cs.tcd.ie>
Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2015 06:58:00 -0400
Message-ID: <CAHbuEH4UttqiwsCk3oarjq7M=CwtnFabK-Gh=3p=_EWWjGfWwA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Kathleen Moriarty <kathleen.moriarty.ietf@gmail.com>
To: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7bb04b7c992f94051b9ce0b9
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/93attendees/3nwI3Qx6ugNAhWHi4NOW90uhpjE>
Cc: "Rodriguez, Iben" <Iben.Rodriguez@spirent.com>, Ondrej Filip <ondrej.filip@nic.cz>, "93attendees@ietf.org" <93attendees@ietf.org>, Lisa Lorenzin <llorenzin@pulsesecure.net>
Subject: Re: [93attendees] IETF dress code policy
X-BeenThere: 93attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Mailing list of IETF 93 attendees that have opted in on this list. " <93attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/93attendees>, <mailto:93attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/93attendees/>
List-Post: <mailto:93attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:93attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/93attendees>, <mailto:93attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2015 10:58:04 -0000

On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 6:52 AM, Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
wrote:

>
> I reckon that it'll be better if the IAOC just find and copy some
> good policy that will prevent a recurrance of this. I know there are
> some trade shows that have introduced such policies so I'd hope
> we don't have to figure this out ourselves via a protracted list
> discussion of possibilities.
>

RSA Conference was mentioned previously and I found this text that could be
helpful:

http://www.networkworld.com/article/2902752/security0/rsa-conference-bans-booth-babes.html


>
> S.
>
> On 24/07/15 11:47, Lisa Lorenzin wrote:
> > My impression was that we were discussing setting an IETF policy to
> prohibit booth babes / scantily dressed women at vendor tables who are
> present strictly as sexualized objects.  That's a far cry from a dress code
> for attendees.
> >
> > Personally, if a lead developer / engineer at a Bits & Bytes demo was
> wearing heels, the only reason I would care would be to ask her (or him)
> what brand they are - heels comfortable enough to wear for a standup job
> like booth duty are few & far between! :)
> >
> > Regards,
> > Lisa
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: 93attendees [mailto:93attendees-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of
> Rodriguez, Iben
> > Sent: Friday, July 24, 2015 12:38 PM
> > To: Ondrej Filip; 93attendees@ietf.org
> > Subject: Re: [93attendees] IETF dress code policy
> >
> > Of course there are 2 sides to every story.  I’ve had to deal with this
> as a parent of teen age daughters who are experiencing this type of reverse
> discrimination based on the way they dress at school.  If a teacher were to
> tell them their clothing style is distracting to the boys in the class we
> have a talk with that teacher there, and the boys.  Unfortunately the girls
> need to deal with this too but the world is changing.
> >
> > I came to the conference for the first time with a suit coat and jacket
> ready to dress up as if for a business meeting. When I checked in I see
> everyone in t-shirts and shorts. This is great!
> >
> > Let’s not pass judgement on someone’s role or respectful dress situation
> these days. It goes both ways.
> >
> > Our efforts should be on improving the rights for those that are truly
> oppressed by their cultural situation.
> >
> > Are we seriously thinking of instituting a dress code policy for these
> events? How would it read?  Let’s not go down this road.
> >
> >
> > On 7/24/15, 11:35 AM, "93attendees on behalf of Ondrej Filip" <
> 93attendees-bounces@ietf.org <mailto:93attendees-bounces@ietf.org>  on
> behalf of ondrej.filip@nic.cz <mailto:ondrej.filip@nic.cz> > wrote:
> >
> > Hello!
> > First of all let me to apologize everybody who felt offended. I am
> really sorry for that we did something unfortunate and as a CEO of the
> company I take the full responsibility.
> >
> > Please, let me explain the background. Those ladies have been working
> with CZ.NIC for a longer time although not as full time employees.
> > But I am telling this to explain that they we have not employed them
> just for the purpose of this event. Both have university degrees although
> not a technical background in IETF related stuff. But they know our company
> very well.
> >
> > Again, I fully understand the point and I apologize for our lack of
> sensitivity. I am very sorry.
> >
> > Ondrej Filip
> >
> >
> >
> > On 24.7.2015 10:31, Jose Saldana wrote:
> >
> >       Hi all,
> >       In my opinion, the bits&bytes booth with the young ladies in short
> skirts, etc. was a bit... let's say ... disrespectful.
> >       I mean, using women just for "decorative" purposes is something I
> don't like. It is common in trade fairs, sports events, etc. But the IETF
> should avoid it (IMHO).
> >       Best regards,
> >       Jose
> >       Sent from my smartphone
> >       _______________________________________________
> >       93attendees mailing list
> >       93attendees@ietf.org <mailto:93attendees@ietf.org>
> >       https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/93attendees
> >
> >
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> 93attendees mailing list
> 93attendees@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/93attendees
>



-- 

Best regards,
Kathleen