IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [93attendees] Meeting schedule

Dave Crocker <dhc@dcrocker.net> Tue, 21 July 2015 12:04 UTC

Return-Path: <dhc@dcrocker.net>
X-Original-To: 93attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 93attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C60381A0A6A; Tue, 21 Jul 2015 05:04:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9WgiRpxfKkyX; Tue, 21 Jul 2015 05:04:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sbh17.songbird.com (sbh17.songbird.com [72.52.113.17]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8BBA61A039C; Tue, 21 Jul 2015 05:04:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [31.133.171.186] (dhcp-abba.meeting.ietf.org [31.133.171.186]) (authenticated bits=0) by sbh17.songbird.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id t6LC4K75026604 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 21 Jul 2015 05:04:22 -0700
References: <p06240602d1d3231e977e@130.129.14.251> <alpine.OSX.2.01.1507201630210.60032@rabdullah.local> <D2E48F4F-CE89-4C1F-ACB4-85F219651A8C@juniper.net> <CAJU8_nXo56kuodKCkWyWFW=sM95Hju216uPD_W3WyzSj3qiUrQ@mail.gmail.com> <p06240603d1d3c31599ff@[130.129.14.251]> <55AE1BF9.6060407@gmail.com>
To: "93attendees@ietf.org" <93attendees@ietf.org>
From: Dave Crocker <dhc@dcrocker.net>
Organization: Brandenburg InternetWorking
Message-ID: <55AE3545.4050403@dcrocker.net>
Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2015 14:04:21 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <55AE1BF9.6060407@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.0 (sbh17.songbird.com [72.52.113.17]); Tue, 21 Jul 2015 05:04:23 -0700 (PDT)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/93attendees/9fMp8NX26Vlacsupv5PNOTlh5DU>
Cc: "IAOC@ietf.org" <IAOC@ietf.org>, Ole Jacobsen <olejacobsen@me.com>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [93attendees] Meeting schedule
X-BeenThere: 93attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: dcrocker@bbiw.net
List-Id: "Mailing list of IETF 93 attendees that have opted in on this list. " <93attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/93attendees>, <mailto:93attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/93attendees/>
List-Post: <mailto:93attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:93attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/93attendees>, <mailto:93attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2015 12:04:25 -0000

>> I'd be fine with extending by an extra day, and/or having WG sessions on Sunday or later on Friday.
> Let me disagree strongly. Saturday and Sunday are already full days for
> some people - writing code rather than going to meetings, in many cases.


+10

We should be looking for ways to reduce the number of meeting hours, not
to increase them.

However, this would require far more stringent filtering of session
requests, and to date, there has been neither community demand, nor IETF
management resolve, to do this.

d/
-- 
Dave Crocker
Brandenburg InternetWorking
bbiw.net

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email