IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [93attendees] IETF dress code policy

Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net> Fri, 24 July 2015 17:06 UTC

Return-Path: <warren@kumari.net>
X-Original-To: 93attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 93attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D7ED1A011D for <93attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 24 Jul 2015 10:06:11 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.977
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.977 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xrQ779Z3n31K for <93attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 24 Jul 2015 10:06:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wi0-f174.google.com (mail-wi0-f174.google.com [209.85.212.174]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A2B511A0105 for <93attendees@ietf.org>; Fri, 24 Jul 2015 10:06:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by wibud3 with SMTP id ud3so73060563wib.1 for <93attendees@ietf.org>; Fri, 24 Jul 2015 10:06:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=dg7GeETHWZK0WPUqsWJixbeFPQc2OtfgS3px0J79UXc=; b=jfvMWjdduWWxjga0jjLRmvO3UyDjHBTJn7PXqnAoFoRvhm+FCqBMha7mo6TTjq2n6s ouOyH4M2gSOPVjzQFRAumUnsTOvcdW9XTP5EeemYc56w0sttMJVRB/MwzshjFNDEkl/y On9aZukoSFf+W2baTcgDJ0g4a5V/99bVs9jOhXadOjo7ltf47IlXYNUWD9bHOFv3ADnL kyYwElK7Pa7qHUiDA6wp+ZidAccPfWz9rT5jUid7NLYeO5cFragkhMzqImbzdkcdstvk YAr0dE9UBggi+RDT8jLv5cVXUA72RDJth3bdscfqzsrQb5H+4A/owRls0y2/dp4F7TlL zgYg==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnxUDgHowBqe43tiy8Ln3sHDpBCTZWPMzF/CNZmyDKMdzRCZkWFbZYbkEl+OJcCg3GnITBm
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.194.178.1 with SMTP id cu1mr28954825wjc.59.1437757568300; Fri, 24 Jul 2015 10:06:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.27.8.203 with HTTP; Fri, 24 Jul 2015 10:06:08 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <79BC3C72-BE65-40D6-86F4-16E3FF59FBED@cisco.com>
References: <28B1F49A-AAE4-429F-B70E-6783040FE829@spirent.com> <BN1PR06MB4371C7F6FE511FAD63C2FE8A8810@BN1PR06MB437.namprd06.prod.outlook.com> <79BC3C72-BE65-40D6-86F4-16E3FF59FBED@cisco.com>
Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2015 19:06:08 +0200
Message-ID: <CAHw9_iKmdq1hNhw_7gqZ+yysPUHR1+M=TG3a0VKY7jsO+uZbVg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net>
To: "Fred Baker (fred)" <fred@cisco.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="089e01160ee421d204051ba20587"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/93attendees/GoN7oA-vkQo_a9uGOeqFHoRfwWA>
Cc: "Rodriguez, Iben" <Iben.Rodriguez@spirent.com>, Ondrej Filip <ondrej.filip@nic.cz>, "93attendees@ietf.org" <93attendees@ietf.org>, Lisa Lorenzin <llorenzin@pulsesecure.net>
Subject: Re: [93attendees] IETF dress code policy
X-BeenThere: 93attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Mailing list of IETF 93 attendees that have opted in on this list. " <93attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/93attendees>, <mailto:93attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/93attendees/>
List-Post: <mailto:93attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:93attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/93attendees>, <mailto:93attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2015 17:06:11 -0000

On Friday, July 24, 2015, Fred Baker (fred) <fred@cisco.com> wrote:

>
> > On Jul 24, 2015, at 12:47 PM, Lisa Lorenzin <llorenzin@pulsesecure.net
> <javascript:;>> wrote:
> >
> > Personally, if a lead developer / engineer at a Bits & Bytes demo was
> wearing heels,
>
> I would not object to a pretty engineer - we need more of them.


Oh, come on... You've got me already, what more could y'all possibly want?!

W


>  These gals weren't engineers. That, at least for my part, was my concern.
> They were there to attract nearby guys to the table. Life is too short for
> that.
>


-- 
I don't think the execution is relevant when it was obviously a bad idea in
the first place.
This is like putting rabid weasels in your pants, and later expressing
regret at having chosen those particular rabid weasels and that pair of
pants.
   ---maf

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email