IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [93attendees] Meeting schedule

Yoav Nir <ynir.ietf@gmail.com> Tue, 21 July 2015 11:37 UTC

Return-Path: <ynir.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: 93attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 93attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D40001A0218 for <93attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 21 Jul 2015 04:37:30 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6hmfEVN3S4R3 for <93attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 21 Jul 2015 04:37:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wi0-x232.google.com (mail-wi0-x232.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c05::232]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A1DD71A026C for <93attendees@ietf.org>; Tue, 21 Jul 2015 04:37:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by wibud3 with SMTP id ud3so124513025wib.0 for <93attendees@ietf.org>; Tue, 21 Jul 2015 04:37:20 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :message-id:references:to; bh=EP96Ptf8VY5HUGNLTIGc/5tqnWLD8ZJaBUTKKAc7K5Y=; b=hdJFx5tkQucVZUNaeggstjCDIdJYUopSNLfEibxMylTA6cb3fVwbeZUz766Jg0NMc8 cIcDXe5mjMjv9BxyTnv1v8+wpLdJNxm5iMwmsxXxWP7DEQs+yj+XWnWQGf3FVt+K7/xx s5OSqBljWvp95Jy+Yyl7fxsovZcZIz6rwEFtqdP3z8+Bh/e7Oocm5WeZHPFxuakMwyRM eqV+6cXVY4gMmdLTt4hzv/yxjNIE/9vZp4Yytf8RhF2UcTAgDgDFkfDXobZ0wgTs6sGz BQls2WaVW0ZbaS5roLZFNVCHOSFkm9Kl9mnrDECbbmDqfeTZgqor6k2/ETDjcB4mC9QR JlyA==
X-Received: by 10.194.120.198 with SMTP id le6mr66517455wjb.133.1437478640454; Tue, 21 Jul 2015 04:37:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ?IPv6:2001:67c:370:176:7c36:939c:8429:f8d6? ([2001:67c:370:176:7c36:939c:8429:f8d6]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id gb16sm16419075wic.5.2015.07.21.04.37.19 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Tue, 21 Jul 2015 04:37:19 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_B9D340FE-8041-4C4F-872A-2BA05E64A698"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.2 \(2102\))
From: Yoav Nir <ynir.ietf@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <A022620E-DC2E-434C-83F3-78E76E0851CA@nominum.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2015 13:37:19 +0200
Message-Id: <19C73CC7-DEA0-49CB-9FB2-09109811B254@gmail.com>
References: <p06240602d1d3231e977e@[130.129.14.251]> <alpine.OSX.2.01.1507201630210.60032@rabdullah.local> <D2E48F4F-CE89-4C1F-ACB4-85F219651A8C@juniper.net> <alpine.OSX.2.01.1507201650211.60032@rabdullah.local> <55ADCF31.20706@gmail.com> <A58586E3-63BA-431C-A85F-0DFCF913A328@gmail.com> <A022620E-DC2E-434C-83F3-78E76E0851CA@nominum.com>
To: Ted Lemon <ted.lemon@nominum.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.2102)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/93attendees/IjiSj7tmDW7zVCpTx6P5X1O7_ys>
Cc: "93attendees@ietf.org" <93attendees@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [93attendees] Meeting schedule
X-BeenThere: 93attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Mailing list of IETF 93 attendees that have opted in on this list. " <93attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/93attendees>, <mailto:93attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/93attendees/>
List-Post: <mailto:93attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:93attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/93attendees>, <mailto:93attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2015 11:37:31 -0000

> On Jul 21, 2015, at 1:23 PM, Ted Lemon <ted.lemon@nominum.com> wrote:
> 
> On Jul 21, 2015, at 1:15 AM, Yoav Nir <ynir.ietf@gmail.com <mailto:ynir.ietf@gmail.com>> wrote:
>> That would mean getting the plenaries back to the end of the day, and anyone who wanted an early dinner could skip them.
> 
> That is an excellent argument for having the plenaries in the morning, I guess, but I suspect that wasn’t your intent.   If the plenaries aren’t working, we should fix them, not skip them.

I don’t know how to answer that without a stated goal of what plenaries are supposed to accomplish.

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email