IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [93attendees] Meeting schedule

Lixia Zhang <lixia@cs.ucla.edu> Tue, 21 July 2015 15:34 UTC

Return-Path: <lixia@cs.ucla.edu>
X-Original-To: 93attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 93attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12C621A88E1 for <93attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 21 Jul 2015 08:34:41 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.211
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.211 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Tx8XQVEDvE2K for <93attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 21 Jul 2015 08:34:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp.cs.ucla.edu (smtp.cs.ucla.edu [131.179.128.62]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60C6D1AD49B for <93attendees@ietf.org>; Tue, 21 Jul 2015 08:34:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.cs.ucla.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 049CDA60009; Tue, 21 Jul 2015 08:34:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at smtp.cs.ucla.edu
Received: from smtp.cs.ucla.edu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.cs.ucla.edu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dwym0wqiO1dD; Tue, 21 Jul 2015 08:34:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dhcp-89c6.meeting.ietf.org (dhcp-89c6.meeting.ietf.org [31.133.137.198]) by smtp.cs.ucla.edu (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8A207A60007; Tue, 21 Jul 2015 08:34:36 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.2 \(2102\))
From: Lixia Zhang <lixia@cs.ucla.edu>
In-Reply-To: <p06240613d1d407147bfb@[130.129.14.251]>
Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2015 08:34:34 -0700
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <9DEC79C9-F117-453A-8F8F-98BA0FC62B08@cs.ucla.edu>
References: <p06240602d1d3231e977e@[130.129.14.251]> <670E6EB2-3519-4B5A-B5BD-D323E15033D7@cs.ucla.edu> <p06240613d1d407147bfb@[130.129.14.251]>
To: Randall Gellens <rg+ietf@qti.qualcomm.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.2102)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/93attendees/M4P4mCk4LpCHVl_sAeQxFz5I-vE>
Cc: 93attendees@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [93attendees] Meeting schedule
X-BeenThere: 93attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Mailing list of IETF 93 attendees that have opted in on this list. " <93attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/93attendees>, <mailto:93attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/93attendees/>
List-Post: <mailto:93attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:93attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/93attendees>, <mailto:93attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2015 15:34:41 -0000

> On Jul 21, 2015, at 7:27 AM, Randall Gellens <rg+ietf@qti.qualcomm.com> wrote:
> 
> At 7:15 AM -0700 7/21/15, Lixia Zhang wrote:
> 
>> i.e. running IAB and IESG plenary back-to-back.
> 
> We used to do this.  The plenary session used to run past midnight.

1/ that was then, this is now.  Might be worth reconsidering.

2/ doing it in the morning has one advantage over an evening meeting (which can drag forever): lunch time makes a hard stop.

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email