Re: [93attendees] IETF dress code policy

Luis Balbinot <luis@luisbalbinot.com> Fri, 24 July 2015 18:22 UTC

Return-Path: <luis@luisbalbinot.com>
X-Original-To: 93attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 93attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 253571AD060 for <93attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 24 Jul 2015 11:22:00 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.977
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.977 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1fv8VhDc9h2O for <93attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 24 Jul 2015 11:21:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-oi0-f41.google.com (mail-oi0-f41.google.com [209.85.218.41]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C84E81ACEEB for <93attendees@ietf.org>; Fri, 24 Jul 2015 11:21:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by oibn4 with SMTP id n4so23298081oib.3 for <93attendees@ietf.org>; Fri, 24 Jul 2015 11:21:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=nY6A9t7MToAPesRbDZyE42RuqzG/eBBz1yr7X5rcaQk=; b=ji3+rjLa5XhoFGJIsX38vpDZ0tpBoTLx4ZwiYvKs/o5MKwGxH1qPw6gnTNz8UbUutM yulxBIzbp34PUXTmYNwZ6hlhNJPlSTOantnkZ6/BMHSFgdqIKwWBGzS+CsTAF8JO5nmF 1LXJ7xSun4bboU1FpX3ZHw8AfWZCmbFmcqWkCEyRLUJ6Bwg2O3Wj01tlTlbXo3HGyRWx QlhKf3xip1muwLrP5EcEHrhMuSC2Py59MZ0EwziXb7XinAbeb7LH0T3w4VtwzsgY2CZh AvsZLzER+52rRmdl3FtIxFIxJz24sA8U8/iIT1QLsMw5vf/hTw3YcNbG0l28Hvlkp+yz SIHw==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQku5D+3SDk72wnYWf5xGYbdf955Ax13T6kbdrXIZpSQgYr4xl8BJ4GAgPYMTWrYv5HasAVZ
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.202.96.8 with SMTP id u8mr15833477oib.77.1437762117265; Fri, 24 Jul 2015 11:21:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.202.173.5 with HTTP; Fri, 24 Jul 2015 11:21:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.202.173.5 with HTTP; Fri, 24 Jul 2015 11:21:57 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <EF2C4B5044B140219A923A23F8C155E7@srichardlxp2>
References: <28B1F49A-AAE4-429F-B70E-6783040FE829@spirent.com> <BN1PR06MB4371C7F6FE511FAD63C2FE8A8810@BN1PR06MB437.namprd06.prod.outlook.com> <79BC3C72-BE65-40D6-86F4-16E3FF59FBED@cisco.com> <EF2C4B5044B140219A923A23F8C155E7@srichardlxp2>
Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2015 20:21:57 +0200
Message-ID: <CAFsaiiNY6eBXBWYGjekW8QBDqVdifdAQhowb7eUO7XvsZ9cjVg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Luis Balbinot <luis@luisbalbinot.com>
To: Richard Scheffenegger <rscheff@gmx.at>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a113d5b8845835d051ba314ba
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/93attendees/PZcvgaf6Z0l2NA9NyzQJ1aTkipU>
Cc: "Rodriguez, Iben" <Iben.Rodriguez@spirent.com>, 93attendees@ietf.org, Ondrej Filip <ondrej.filip@nic.cz>, "Fred Baker \(fred\)" <fred@cisco.com>, Lisa Lorenzin <llorenzin@pulsesecure.net>
Subject: Re: [93attendees] IETF dress code policy
X-BeenThere: 93attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Mailing list of IETF 93 attendees that have opted in on this list. " <93attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/93attendees>, <mailto:93attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/93attendees/>
List-Post: <mailto:93attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:93attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/93attendees>, <mailto:93attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2015 18:22:00 -0000

I also do not object the girls. They were only there to handle balls.
On Jul 24, 2015 8:17 PM, "Richard Scheffenegger" <rscheff@gmx.at> wrote:

> I'm with Fred.
>
> However, having been attracted to their booth, I found in the discussions
> with the engineers present, that the level of expertise was not on-par with
> many of the questions...
>
> They would  have had to bring the actual electrical and software engineers
> working on the product to the booth on events like this.
>
> Best regards,
>  Richard
>
>
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Fred Baker (fred)" <fred@cisco.com>
> To: "Lisa Lorenzin" <llorenzin@pulsesecure.net>
> Cc: "Rodriguez, Iben" <Iben.Rodriguez@spirent.com>om>; "Ondrej Filip" <
> ondrej.filip@nic.cz>gt;; <93attendees@ietf.org>
> Sent: Friday, July 24, 2015 5:50 PM
> Subject: Re: [93attendees] IETF dress code policy
>
>
>  On Jul 24, 2015, at 12:47 PM, Lisa Lorenzin <llorenzin@pulsesecure.net>
>> wrote:
>>
>> Personally, if a lead developer / engineer at a Bits & Bytes demo was
>> wearing heels,
>>
>
> I would not object to a pretty engineer - we need more of them. These gals
> weren't engineers. That, at least for my part, was my concern. They were
> there to attract nearby guys to the table. Life is too short for that.
>
>
>  _______________________________________________
>> 93attendees mailing list
>> 93attendees@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/93attendees
>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> 93attendees mailing list
> 93attendees@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/93attendees
>