Re: [93attendees] Meeting schedule

"Andrew G. Malis" <agmalis@gmail.com> Tue, 21 July 2015 08:17 UTC

Return-Path: <agmalis@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: 93attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 93attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BAFAA1B29EE; Tue, 21 Jul 2015 01:17:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XVJ4bu57XztX; Tue, 21 Jul 2015 01:17:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wi0-x22c.google.com (mail-wi0-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c05::22c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1CB041B29EA; Tue, 21 Jul 2015 01:17:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by wicgb10 with SMTP id gb10so47843142wic.1; Tue, 21 Jul 2015 01:17:32 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=0Kb+g+LtFYCzsHpwhocqJvv/KXl9PtX4Rs1meIqR+lE=; b=D4+3Zv5J4V2cpZpCM+zCSL67hSMVBK9b+A/yRLg68is7SqlzwTVeEK1X321Ib825pF I7Okk/j079F0nmkcwuYivAElPaoDQTsnTI7jUb5x8H0GT+/g40bNbTztrz+w4ocTMckR awD+OJ9c0k2TQbv1DlcrfpDs93AiX3msm/FQmWrjwFCwpA2O1SagDTZ1tCSJ7v0fxFcD LbMIUv8QCfQSok/2npDyxzR+r8vksb+xlPVV0OgT2mlbTLsKTkYZHZPfA/CXk0iss35e 1HaYQDL3flCqfcYUp7nnKLQVowyVxM4+rLmgeYlqKqySpCEJiCsVT+XKuI9VaEPV1AdQ eexA==
X-Received: by 10.180.182.40 with SMTP id eb8mr28350856wic.47.1437466652805; Tue, 21 Jul 2015 01:17:32 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.28.154.5 with HTTP; Tue, 21 Jul 2015 01:17:13 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <A58586E3-63BA-431C-A85F-0DFCF913A328@gmail.com>
References: <p06240602d1d3231e977e@130.129.14.251> <alpine.OSX.2.01.1507201630210.60032@rabdullah.local> <D2E48F4F-CE89-4C1F-ACB4-85F219651A8C@juniper.net> <alpine.OSX.2.01.1507201650211.60032@rabdullah.local> <55ADCF31.20706@gmail.com> <A58586E3-63BA-431C-A85F-0DFCF913A328@gmail.com>
From: "Andrew G. Malis" <agmalis@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2015 10:17:13 +0200
Message-ID: <CAA=duU0amy4N1R4gZpRUEqGj-AoGnhdin-Xp7L8g7XpEAAr59A@mail.gmail.com>
To: Yoav Nir <ynir.ietf@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7b66f46f378e19051b5e4952
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/93attendees/PccrXUlrStnFcS4AsjZR_Zc6mV0>
Cc: Kireeti Kompella <kireeti@juniper.net>, "IAOC@ietf.org" <IAOC@ietf.org>, "93attendees@ietf.org" <93attendees@ietf.org>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, Ole Jacobsen <olejacobsen@me.com>, Randall Gellens <rg+ietf@qti.qualcomm.com>
Subject: Re: [93attendees] Meeting schedule
X-BeenThere: 93attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Mailing list of IETF 93 attendees that have opted in on this list. " <93attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/93attendees>, <mailto:93attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/93attendees/>
List-Post: <mailto:93attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:93attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/93attendees>, <mailto:93attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2015 08:17:38 -0000

I also prefer going back to the plenaries at the end of the day. I
understand that having them in the morning is more convenient for the
hotel, but they're here to serve us, not vice versa.

Cheers,
Andy


On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 7:15 AM, Yoav Nir <ynir.ietf@gmail.com> wrote:

>
> On Jul 21, 2015, at 6:48 AM, Brian E Carpenter <
> brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >> And I agree with that as well! But the current long day, which for
> >> many includes breakfast meetings, runs 7am to [nearly] 8pm which
> >> probably does not contribute to overall productivity.
> >
> > As long as people want to arrive on Sunday and leave on Friday
> > afternoon, it's hard to see what to change.
>
> The two plenaries add up to 5 hours. If they didn’t take up real meeting
> time, we could shorten each meeting day by one hour.
>
> That would mean getting the plenaries back to the end of the day, and
> anyone who wanted an early dinner could skip them.
>
> But regardless, for “real IETF-ers”, the ones who don’t come for just a
> few sessions, an IETF week is always pretty intense.
>
> Yoav
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> 93attendees mailing list
> 93attendees@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/93attendees
>