IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [93attendees] IETF dress code policy

"Leif Johansson" <leifj@sunet.se> Sat, 25 July 2015 15:43 UTC

Return-Path: <leifj@sunet.se>
X-Original-To: 93attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 93attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78F851A8BC0 for <93attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 25 Jul 2015 08:43:36 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.66
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.66 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HELO_EQ_SE=0.35, MIME_BASE64_BLANKS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cR0REYVgsuop for <93attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 25 Jul 2015 08:43:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from e-mailfilter01.sunet.se (e-mailfilter01.sunet.se [IPv6:2001:6b0:8:2::201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B2D021A8F37 for <93attendees@ietf.org>; Sat, 25 Jul 2015 08:43:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp1.sunet.se (smtp1.sunet.se [192.36.171.214]) by e-mailfilter01.sunet.se (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-4) with ESMTP id t6PFhV29005209 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Sat, 25 Jul 2015 17:43:31 +0200
Received: from kerio.sunet.se (kerio.sunet.se [192.36.171.210]) by smtp1.sunet.se (8.14.9/8.14.7) with ESMTP id t6PFhQU9023993 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sat, 25 Jul 2015 17:43:30 +0200 (CEST)
VBR-Info: md=sunet.se; mc=all; mv=swamid.se
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=sunet.se; s=default; t=1437839011; bh=jmgSxyrmuDHuuAuxpY9zFgyoU6kemgG+nYMsyWo49II=; h=From:Subject:Date:References:To:In-Reply-To:Cc; b=YaUjSgTLkZjCXEgKn7VT2ILmrTb8LeXD0PwKsj5owDduDxnCH/hl0He+D4U7eyJaS 9ewl9gZccZpNC8GXzQPPEFCWg6aIZIJAj0PkhMQMpNAM+9bOp64dT2B6B6isRlZy4k 3W9pVQFlggRZ0bIW4zyAtLJVBGt+I73HBxTigMzc=
X-Footer: c3VuZXQuc2U=
Received: from [2.65.82.45] ([2.65.82.45]) by kerio.sunet.se (Kerio Connect 8.3.4 patch 1); Sat, 25 Jul 2015 17:43:25 +0200
From: Leif Johansson <leifj@sunet.se>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
Message-Id: <00A95073-3BF4-41D9-8B76-5227E739A5EE@sunet.se>
Date: Sat, 25 Jul 2015 17:43:25 +0200
References: <28B1F49A-AAE4-429F-B70E-6783040FE829@spirent.com> <BN1PR06MB4371C7F6FE511FAD63C2FE8A8810@BN1PR06MB437.namprd06.prod.outlook.com> <79BC3C72-BE65-40D6-86F4-16E3FF59FBED@cisco.com> <alpine.DEB.2.02.1507251218170.11810@uplift.swm.pp.se> <alpine.LFD.2.11.1507250637550.854@bofh.nohats.ca> <B7089F55-1901-4983-B7E6-59B63EA17762@nominum.com>
To: Ted Lemon <ted.lemon@nominum.com>
In-Reply-To: <B7089F55-1901-4983-B7E6-59B63EA17762@nominum.com>
X-Bayes-Prob: 0.0001 (Score 0, tokens from: outbound, outbound-sunet-se:default, sunet-se:default, base:default, @@RPTN)
X-CanIt-Geo: ip=192.36.171.210; country=SE; latitude=59.3294; longitude=18.0686; http://maps.google.com/maps?q=59.3294,18.0686&z=6
X-CanItPRO-Stream: outbound-sunet-se:outbound (inherits from outbound-sunet-se:default, sunet-se:default, base:default)
X-Canit-Stats-ID: 09OUDHvUi - aa7eac8510ab - 20150725
X-CanIt-Archive-Cluster: PfMRe/vJWMiXwM2YIH5BVExnUnw
Received-SPF: neutral (e-mailfilter01.sunet.se: 192.36.171.210 is neither permitted nor denied by domain leifj@sunet.se) receiver=e-mailfilter01.sunet.se; client-ip=192.36.171.210; envelope-from=<leifj@sunet.se>; helo=smtp1.sunet.se; identity=mailfrom
X-Scanned-By: CanIt (www . roaringpenguin . com) on 192.36.171.201
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/93attendees/QVwSREa47LV-PUtK9XWO1J1ZGa4>
Cc: Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca>, Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se>, "93attendees@ietf.org" <93attendees@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [93attendees] IETF dress code policy
X-BeenThere: 93attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Mailing list of IETF 93 attendees that have opted in on this list. " <93attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/93attendees>, <mailto:93attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/93attendees/>
List-Post: <mailto:93attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:93attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/93attendees>, <mailto:93attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 25 Jul 2015 15:43:36 -0000


> 25 jul 2015 kl. 17:13 skrev Ted Lemon <ted.lemon@nominum.com>:
> 
> Has it occurred to any of you who are flashing the term “booth babes” as if it were neutral that it is itself in fact just as misogynistic as anything else being said here?   I agree with Randy that we should drop this discussion, but if you must continue to blather on about it, please at least don’t use the term “booth babes” as if it were a valid way to classify women while at the same time accusing others of misogyny.

finally

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email