Re: [93attendees] I was wondering...

Ted Lemon <ted.lemon@nominum.com> Mon, 27 July 2015 13:05 UTC

Return-Path: <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com>
X-Original-To: 93attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 93attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32AE41B2D0C for <93attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 27 Jul 2015 06:05:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.909
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.909 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5pePAToQYnUI for <93attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 27 Jul 2015 06:05:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sjc1-mx02-inside.nominum.com (sjc1-mx02-inside.nominum.com [64.89.234.25]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3E1991B2D0D for <93attendees@ietf.org>; Mon, 27 Jul 2015 06:05:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from webmail.nominum.com (cas-04.win.nominum.com [64.89.235.67]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "mail.nominum.com", Issuer "Go Daddy Secure Certificate Authority - G2" (verified OK)) by sjc1-mx02-inside.nominum.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 17A5DDA008B; Mon, 27 Jul 2015 13:05:54 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from [10.0.20.218] (71.233.41.235) by CAS-04.WIN.NOMINUM.COM (192.168.1.101) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.224.2; Mon, 27 Jul 2015 06:05:47 -0700
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_19EA6F28-B9F1-465A-8A7A-878C474C001F"
MIME-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.2 \(2102\))
From: Ted Lemon <ted.lemon@nominum.com>
In-Reply-To: <55B61D28.2030604@dcrocker.net>
Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2015 09:05:45 -0400
Message-ID: <33A73A72-7FE6-4845-A3FF-C57C2BE96620@nominum.com>
References: <roeehnxgoypgq14hcab6bxgt.1437726661503@email.android.com> <D1D7C653.A348C%brian.rosen@neustar.biz> <D1D7D92E.25550A%Jonne.soininen@nsn.com> <55B2010D.70607@gmail.com> <D1D7D8E8.BB63C%Lee.Howard@twcable.com> <20150724110203.GA24701@laperouse.bortzmeyer.org> <CABCOCHQhv-15tdaAfRTMd7Lm5qogGtAroa=d7WRa+RthXktXGA@mail.gmail.com> <EB9B93801780FD4CA165E0FBCB3C3E672B388F1B@SJEXCHMB09.corp.ad.broadcom.com> <7743A092-2034-43AE-80B4-06C2332F148D@cisco.com> <EB9B93801780FD4CA165E0FBCB3C3E672B389020@SJEXCHMB09.corp.ad.broadcom.com> <BDAC17A1-FA79-465B-AE63-922B8B984E8F@gmail.com> <CAMv1YtvgsT5QVJPM7PvZLH-0swHdmsN3HmTN+UaTaLZZ+-DqcQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAC4RtVCViRk1ofLOiuTp4gfj+-41h_7QWimEghouj8BmGkb_Jw@mail.gmail.com> <m27fpmm61u.wl%randy@psg.com> <55B61D28.2030604@dcrocker.net>
To: dcrocker@bbiw.net
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.2102)
X-Originating-IP: [71.233.41.235]
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/93attendees/QwsyLwxt-sdtwl7FbosVc7Rmfm8>
Cc: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>, attendees <93attendees@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [93attendees] I was wondering...
X-BeenThere: 93attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Mailing list of IETF 93 attendees that have opted in on this list. " <93attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/93attendees>, <mailto:93attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/93attendees/>
List-Post: <mailto:93attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:93attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/93attendees>, <mailto:93attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2015 13:05:55 -0000

On Jul 27, 2015, at 7:59 AM, Dave Crocker <dhc@dcrocker.net> wrote:
> Discussion is primarily about institutionally-imposed sexist behaviors.

Mostly by men,  mostly who are not subject matter experts, mostly pointless.   Please stop.