Re: [93attendees] _No_ network experiment during the meeting
Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net> Mon, 20 July 2015 10:38 UTC
Return-Path: <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
X-Original-To: 93attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 93attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1])
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6BE91A1B15
for <93attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 20 Jul 2015 03:38:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.91
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.91 tagged_above=-999 required=5
tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44])
by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id Z_yWMwLF9o_2 for <93attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>;
Mon, 20 Jul 2015 03:38:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from p130.piuha.net (p130.piuha.net [IPv6:2a00:1d50:2::130])
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7BB3F1A1B9C
for <93attendees@ietf.org>; Mon, 20 Jul 2015 03:32:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by p130.piuha.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id D19E72CC5F;
Mon, 20 Jul 2015 13:32:26 +0300 (EEST)
(envelope-from jari.arkko@piuha.net)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at piuha.net
Received: from p130.piuha.net ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (p130.piuha.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id vMYVPNjh5PFe; Mon, 20 Jul 2015 13:32:26 +0300 (EEST)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (p130.piuha.net [IPv6:2a00:1d50:2::130])
by p130.piuha.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 230182CC5C;
Mon, 20 Jul 2015 13:32:26 +0300 (EEST)
(envelope-from jari.arkko@piuha.net)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\))
Content-Type: multipart/signed;
boundary="Apple-Mail=_8806E353-3EEE-48FF-9AF2-DF4867F7945B";
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha512
X-Pgp-Agent: GPGMail 2.5
From: Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
In-Reply-To: <55ACA6A2.1000204@hs-augsburg.de>
Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2015 12:32:24 +0200
Message-Id: <649F40A1-8E18-4F57-8EDA-ECFCC7B7D3B0@piuha.net>
References: <55AAAE92.7010007@hs-augsburg.de>
<D1D1DB10.510D7%evyncke@cisco.com>
<CAO_Rpc+oq18vZatdYZ-M1bJMtSVJ0HLZ+SFoAsC_vR_Ott=6Nw@mail.gmail.com>
<55ACA6A2.1000204@hs-augsburg.de>
To: Rolf Winter <rolf.winter@hs-augsburg.de>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/93attendees/W3YRDOeVhWywTp6KiflOgX7OChw>
Cc: 93attendees@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [93attendees] _No_ network experiment during the meeting
X-BeenThere: 93attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Mailing list of IETF 93 attendees that have opted in on this list. "
<93attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/93attendees>,
<mailto:93attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/93attendees/>
List-Post: <mailto:93attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:93attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/93attendees>,
<mailto:93attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2015 10:38:14 -0000
The reason was lack of time to resolve the legal question. But I wanted to add two things. First, I’m personally sorry that we were unable to do this. The research was interesting, and I would have wanted to see the results. If I had seen the issues earlier, perhaps we could have gotten this done. Sorry. Second, we took the question up in the IESG about how we do experiments, and decided to form a small sub-committee (incl. connections to suitable legal assist as needed) to approve experiments. Most experiments don’t have the type of issues that Rolf’s proposed experiment had, but we’d like to expand rather than constrict the IETF network as a platform for experiments. Stay tuned for further details as we craft them. Thanks, Jari
- [93attendees] _No_ network experiment during the … Rolf Winter
- Re: [93attendees] _No_ network experiment during … Eric Vyncke (evyncke)
- Re: [93attendees] _No_ network experiment during … Chris Elliott
- Re: [93attendees] _No_ network experiment during … Rolf Winter
- Re: [93attendees] _No_ network experiment during … Jari Arkko
- Re: [93attendees] _No_ network experiment during … Daniel Kahn Gillmor
- Re: [93attendees] _No_ network experiment during … Joseph Lorenzo Hall
- Re: [93attendees] _No_ network experiment during … Dave Crocker
- Re: [93attendees] _No_ network experiment during … DRAGE, Keith (Keith)