Re: [93attendees] Meeting schedule

Kathleen Moriarty <kathleen.moriarty.ietf@gmail.com> Tue, 21 July 2015 12:22 UTC

Return-Path: <kathleen.moriarty.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: 93attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 93attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6FC701A1A43; Tue, 21 Jul 2015 05:22:12 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7vONPf0X_3as; Tue, 21 Jul 2015 05:22:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wi0-x236.google.com (mail-wi0-x236.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c05::236]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 44EF41A0218; Tue, 21 Jul 2015 05:22:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by wibxm9 with SMTP id xm9so55242971wib.1; Tue, 21 Jul 2015 05:22:09 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=wycGzqdHLZZK+w+IczSE0v4haYPFNK9WGPwZCmcBq1w=; b=Xtdd8P7ckyBwuVOsH5C4P/3t9+j9LaPFon8GVSjWo8tmjIzUJTUOaFJoLkfiDisNMa vAp1r1KnFjrbJNJtPYmqpkq4ukA0HBCqXK/8A7EaXMbpVIrL/oviDK3jnD52sT/FdQMg CUh7WjfEQHY+thUogw3j2gYG4yxr5zVRvwFQtW7dv+LXmiSjnIhmQVszBDXELS1y1u9/ hwIHcYU5WIfvNHvkXb3I3KvSJoWhVLPMchC3ZXH24ZkfTX+BbCwMDGEVu63OcVBmOxou HltI+mFYiMQOMDSX8I0o5QB9KiM1+hQ6pUErms0CddUB5m/lV19ASEzZ5ITtVccIrrVb xjhQ==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.180.79.10 with SMTP id f10mr31055625wix.1.1437481329093; Tue, 21 Jul 2015 05:22:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.28.31.194 with HTTP; Tue, 21 Jul 2015 05:22:08 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAG4d1reNvRhM+3raUByOY9rdKvDssD6t+ha=ZB68QU+nsrTkyg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <p06240602d1d3231e977e@130.129.14.251> <alpine.OSX.2.01.1507201630210.60032@rabdullah.local> <D2E48F4F-CE89-4C1F-ACB4-85F219651A8C@juniper.net> <CAJU8_nXo56kuodKCkWyWFW=sM95Hju216uPD_W3WyzSj3qiUrQ@mail.gmail.com> <p06240603d1d3c31599ff@130.129.14.251> <55AE1BF9.6060407@gmail.com> <55AE3545.4050403@dcrocker.net> <779EF8F4-84AD-449B-9314-84693807D8CC@juniper.net> <CAG4d1reNvRhM+3raUByOY9rdKvDssD6t+ha=ZB68QU+nsrTkyg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2015 08:22:08 -0400
Message-ID: <CAHbuEH5nkQs1mO-hgDJWV974WnZQm5ynD2rT+VL=a5Zs-_ZOQQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Kathleen Moriarty <kathleen.moriarty.ietf@gmail.com>
To: Alia Atlas <akatlas@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=f46d04428298fdf175051b61b350
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/93attendees/Y36CARn8KZB0E4uWnDyW5GeFxv0>
Cc: Jeff Haas <jhaas@juniper.net>, "IAOC@ietf.org" <IAOC@ietf.org>, "93attendees@ietf.org" <93attendees@ietf.org>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, Ole Jacobsen <olejacobsen@me.com>, Dave Crocker <dcrocker@bbiw.net>
Subject: Re: [93attendees] Meeting schedule
X-BeenThere: 93attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Mailing list of IETF 93 attendees that have opted in on this list. " <93attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/93attendees>, <mailto:93attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/93attendees/>
List-Post: <mailto:93attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:93attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/93attendees>, <mailto:93attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2015 12:22:12 -0000

On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 8:17 AM, Alia Atlas <akatlas@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 8:14 AM, Jeff Haas <jhaas@juniper.net> wrote:
>
>>
>> > On Jul 21, 2015, at 2:04 PM, Dave Crocker <dhc@dcrocker.net> wrote:
>> >
>> > We should be looking for ways to reduce the number of meeting hours, not
>> > to increase them.
>>
>> How well have we done the last few meetings, including this one, at
>> having full session times?  If we have fractional sessions, do we have any
>> possibility of squeezing two groups into a single room?
>>
>
> Sometimes we do that.  I believe that PIM and MBONED are doing that again
> this time.
>

IPsecMe and COSE shared a room.  This was nice as we had some more crypto
folks in the room for COSE and hopefully piqued their interest.

>
> Alia
>
>
>> -- Jeff
>>
>>
>


-- 

Best regards,
Kathleen