Re: [93attendees] Network experiment during the meeting

Jared Mauch <jared@puck.Nether.net> Wed, 15 July 2015 18:25 UTC

Return-Path: <jared@puck.nether.net>
X-Original-To: 93attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 93attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48F261AD065 for <93attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 15 Jul 2015 11:25:30 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.912
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.912 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id W_9Lr4--9sEh for <93attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 15 Jul 2015 11:25:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from puck.nether.net (puck.nether.net [IPv6:2001:418:3f4::5]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 136E81A6EDC for <93attendees@ietf.org>; Wed, 15 Jul 2015 11:25:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by puck.nether.net (Postfix, from userid 162) id C02695406D0; Wed, 15 Jul 2015 14:25:27 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2015 14:25:27 -0400
From: Jared Mauch <jared@puck.Nether.net>
To: dcrocker@bbiw.net
Message-ID: <20150715182527.GA15306@puck.nether.net>
References: <55A41BEB.3090102@hs-augsburg.de> <55A52719.1000208@gmail.com> <CAO_Rpc+-fQBU+MuOR03VHDgw3HcbOWPcThUR3nR2Vnj9CcM63w@mail.gmail.com> <C2443FFD-988C-4B31-ADB3-3AEAD994387A@isoc.org> <CAO_RpcKCYBxOW9eYLUCD2qiPuAQE3-tj8hwe_AXVJYUr+Y4h=g@mail.gmail.com> <D1CBF04C.50692%evyncke@cisco.com> <20150715121528.GA7114@puck.nether.net> <55A6629E.8050700@dcrocker.net> <20150715135932.GA27288@puck.nether.net> <55A674BB.7050400@dcrocker.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <55A674BB.7050400@dcrocker.net>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/93attendees/acNy5aT9inzRRvwHI0xcytoXZ8A>
Cc: "93attendees@ietf.org" <93attendees@ietf.org>, Jared Mauch <jared@puck.nether.net>
Subject: Re: [93attendees] Network experiment during the meeting
X-BeenThere: 93attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Mailing list of IETF 93 attendees that have opted in on this list. " <93attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/93attendees>, <mailto:93attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/93attendees/>
List-Post: <mailto:93attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:93attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/93attendees>, <mailto:93attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2015 18:25:30 -0000

On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 07:56:59AM -0700, Dave Crocker wrote:
> So, sorry, but raising concerns about this publicly is what was needed.
>  It also provided a way of determining whether the IETF community cares
> about the privacy and user agreement issues for this activity.

	Not everyone is on the attendee list, so perhaps ietf@
is a better venue?  I opted in to hear about how hot the rooms
are, why there are insufficent cookies and other comic relief.

	I'm certainly greatful for the attempt at disclosure
even if people deem it too late.  It sounds like there could have
been better communication there.  As with all things, it's hard or
impossible to reach 100%.  I applaud those who are trying.

	- Jared

-- 
Jared Mauch  | pgp key available via finger from jared@puck.nether.net
clue++;      | http://puck.nether.net/~jared/  My statements are only mine.