IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [93attendees] IETF dress code policy

Ted Lemon <ted.lemon@nominum.com> Fri, 24 July 2015 21:26 UTC

Return-Path: <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com>
X-Original-To: 93attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 93attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34C571A024E for <93attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 24 Jul 2015 14:26:28 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.909
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.909 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9Y64NQf2nMER for <93attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 24 Jul 2015 14:26:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sjc1-mx02-inside.nominum.com (sjc1-mx02-inside.nominum.com [64.89.234.25]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2E02E1A024C for <93attendees@ietf.org>; Fri, 24 Jul 2015 14:26:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from webmail.nominum.com (cas-04.win.nominum.com [64.89.235.67]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "mail.nominum.com", Issuer "Go Daddy Secure Certificate Authority - G2" (verified OK)) by sjc1-mx02-inside.nominum.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0ED0FDA0085; Fri, 24 Jul 2015 21:26:27 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from [10.0.20.218] (71.233.41.235) by CAS-04.WIN.NOMINUM.COM (192.168.1.101) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.224.2; Fri, 24 Jul 2015 14:26:26 -0700
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_3373A8F3-48D7-4619-BA41-76B3A13DAC82"
MIME-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.2 \(2102\))
From: Ted Lemon <ted.lemon@nominum.com>
In-Reply-To: <79BC3C72-BE65-40D6-86F4-16E3FF59FBED@cisco.com>
Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2015 17:26:24 -0400
Message-ID: <9CED5ECD-80A8-4307-8CF7-DC18856917EA@nominum.com>
References: <28B1F49A-AAE4-429F-B70E-6783040FE829@spirent.com> <BN1PR06MB4371C7F6FE511FAD63C2FE8A8810@BN1PR06MB437.namprd06.prod.outlook.com> <79BC3C72-BE65-40D6-86F4-16E3FF59FBED@cisco.com>
To: "Fred Baker (fred)" <fred@cisco.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.2102)
X-Originating-IP: [71.233.41.235]
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/93attendees/bO3vX4nq93i6otjA3vKBmgN07ac>
Cc: "Rodriguez, Iben" <Iben.Rodriguez@spirent.com>, Ondrej Filip <ondrej.filip@nic.cz>, "93attendees@ietf.org" <93attendees@ietf.org>, Lisa Lorenzin <llorenzin@pulsesecure.net>
Subject: Re: [93attendees] IETF dress code policy
X-BeenThere: 93attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Mailing list of IETF 93 attendees that have opted in on this list. " <93attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/93attendees>, <mailto:93attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/93attendees/>
List-Post: <mailto:93attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:93attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/93attendees>, <mailto:93attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2015 21:26:28 -0000

On Jul 24, 2015, at 11:50 AM, Fred Baker (fred) <fred@cisco.com> wrote:
> I would not object to a [redacted]

Can we please, please stop before someone says something so problematic that they get PR-actioned?   What Pat Thaler said (bits and bytes booth folks should be able to discuss the tech) was exactly right, and the rest of us ought to shut the hell up, which I will now do.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email