IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [93attendees] Network experiment during the meeting

Toerless Eckert <eckert@cisco.com> Wed, 15 July 2015 17:02 UTC

Return-Path: <eckert@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: 93attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 93attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 563F81A21B6 for <93attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 15 Jul 2015 10:02:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.511
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.511 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id w4iYC3oTqquB for <93attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 15 Jul 2015 10:02:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-1.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-1.cisco.com [173.37.86.72]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5AF741A21B4 for <93attendees@ietf.org>; Wed, 15 Jul 2015 10:02:19 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=544; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1436979739; x=1438189339; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=vHri7HQGd8SkWWhCCiNRgO6FvZfeLW0TvepGhR6zG30=; b=dLDgfpvJPQ4arVjxMB32B5Ks4lLNDMmWUIJovUZDn6k3k4Nf0ROVKxjb EYVQbzoKJ1hks+QJXjoqinIpXjaM4ru8BSTBtXZhtq3+dAhwNd5L1HuBV s9t1FnJaoJb4uRyKBtsaNiF12EYsvlvTBP+LEuv2f1owPj/7yCCg+2pC9 U=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0AmAwDmkKZV/5tdJa1bgxO9DAmHbQKBQTgUAQEBAQEBAYEKhCQBAQQ6PxALGAklDwVJiEHQbAEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBGItMhQYHhCsBBI0ghx2MDQGYdiaEHB6CfAEBAQ
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.15,481,1432598400"; d="scan'208";a="15695724"
Received: from rcdn-core-4.cisco.com ([173.37.93.155]) by rcdn-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP; 15 Jul 2015 17:02:18 +0000
Received: from mcast-linux1.cisco.com (mcast-linux1.cisco.com [172.27.244.121]) by rcdn-core-4.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id t6FH2HEX017648 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 15 Jul 2015 17:02:18 GMT
Received: from mcast-linux1.cisco.com (localhost.cisco.com [127.0.0.1]) by mcast-linux1.cisco.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id t6FH2HO5018660; Wed, 15 Jul 2015 10:02:17 -0700
Received: (from eckert@localhost) by mcast-linux1.cisco.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) id t6FH2F0Y018657; Wed, 15 Jul 2015 10:02:15 -0700
Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2015 10:02:15 -0700
From: Toerless Eckert <eckert@cisco.com>
To: Stephen Botzko <stephen.botzko@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <20150715170215.GU1862@cisco.com>
References: <CAO_Rpc+-fQBU+MuOR03VHDgw3HcbOWPcThUR3nR2Vnj9CcM63w@mail.gmail.com> <C2443FFD-988C-4B31-ADB3-3AEAD994387A@isoc.org> <CAO_RpcKCYBxOW9eYLUCD2qiPuAQE3-tj8hwe_AXVJYUr+Y4h=g@mail.gmail.com> <D1CBF04C.50692%evyncke@cisco.com> <20150715121528.GA7114@puck.nether.net> <55A6629E.8050700@dcrocker.net> <20150715135804.GP1862@cisco.com> <55A671D6.9020707@dcrocker.net> <20150715154753.GS1862@cisco.com> <CAMC7SJ6RGjdnV91PNtA-o6B_VXG0hfhpx54nvvqet002rHtzKQ@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAMC7SJ6RGjdnV91PNtA-o6B_VXG0hfhpx54nvvqet002rHtzKQ@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/93attendees/cMZit9Jx2nY_-X9mCi02enbUsw0>
Cc: Jared Mauch <jared@puck.nether.net>, dcrocker@bbiw.net, "93attendees@ietf.org" <93attendees@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [93attendees] Network experiment during the meeting
X-BeenThere: 93attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Mailing list of IETF 93 attendees that have opted in on this list. " <93attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/93attendees>, <mailto:93attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/93attendees/>
List-Post: <mailto:93attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:93attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/93attendees>, <mailto:93attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2015 17:02:20 -0000

On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 12:56:35PM -0400, Stephen Botzko wrote:
> >>>
> I think the note well is trying to do its best to idemnify the IETF
> and its participants against lawsuits claiming infringing on trade secret
> or claims of novelty for things mentioned in public at the IETF.
> >>>
> There is *nothing* in the Note Well (nor in the RFCs it references) about
> indemnification.

Sure, but the note well does not explain why the IETF does it, and
why it has attendees accept it. 

s/idemnify/protect/ ?

Cheers
   Toerless

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email