Re: [93attendees] IETF dress code policy
Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca> Sat, 25 July 2015 10:54 UTC
Return-Path: <paul@nohats.ca>
X-Original-To: 93attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 93attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E59C71A044F for <93attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 25 Jul 2015 03:54:37 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.01
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.01 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8fUesdNZ0JiS for <93attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 25 Jul 2015 03:54:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx.nohats.ca (mx.nohats.ca [IPv6:2a03:6000:1004:1::68]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A585F1A036C for <93attendees@ietf.org>; Sat, 25 Jul 2015 03:54:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by mx.nohats.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3mdkmp4hr3zD7M; Sat, 25 Jul 2015 12:54:34 +0200 (CEST)
Authentication-Results: mx.nohats.ca; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=nohats.ca header.i=@nohats.ca header.b=p6OKwCJH
X-OPENPGPKEY: Message passed unmodified
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mx.nohats.ca
Received: from mx.nohats.ca ([IPv6:::1]) by localhost (mx.nohats.ca [IPv6:::1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JFx5V5FtWBbF; Sat, 25 Jul 2015 12:54:33 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from bofh.nohats.ca (206-248-139-105.dsl.teksavvy.com [206.248.139.105]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx.nohats.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS; Sat, 25 Jul 2015 12:54:33 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from bofh.nohats.ca (bofh.nohats.ca [127.0.0.1]) by bofh.nohats.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5A0D800B3; Sat, 25 Jul 2015 06:54:32 -0400 (EDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=nohats.ca; s=default; t=1437821672; bh=Q01Z/3gFwY8h41XE61FF5SF0Rzt+4cziiPY8ntg0e4U=; h=Date:From:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References; b=p6OKwCJHJV1HsoiMbM1ECR79V+PnYvA6bDU/QE4V/IjTEWrPbXN60bjJCFiSe13He amcYF7toxG6WoxxdrmvPM7swgG/85thVycpEEBGJGP6eih05D5DPp4MJp9dos61Xfu SiWLGfpScOuH42evtGXzd6r4q/3nM7c1Ysg9tJwQ=
Received: from localhost (paul@localhost) by bofh.nohats.ca (8.15.1/8.15.1/Submit) with ESMTP id t6PAsWm1005798; Sat, 25 Jul 2015 06:54:32 -0400
X-Authentication-Warning: bofh.nohats.ca: paul owned process doing -bs
Date: Sat, 25 Jul 2015 06:54:32 -0400
From: Paul Wouters <paul@nohats.ca>
To: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se>
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1507251218170.11810@uplift.swm.pp.se>
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.11.1507250637550.854@bofh.nohats.ca>
References: <28B1F49A-AAE4-429F-B70E-6783040FE829@spirent.com> <BN1PR06MB4371C7F6FE511FAD63C2FE8A8810@BN1PR06MB437.namprd06.prod.outlook.com> <79BC3C72-BE65-40D6-86F4-16E3FF59FBED@cisco.com> <alpine.DEB.2.02.1507251218170.11810@uplift.swm.pp.se>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.11 (LFD 23 2013-08-11)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/93attendees/cx7w98oNZf3C02ONIi_F46926Oc>
Cc: "93attendees@ietf.org" <93attendees@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [93attendees] IETF dress code policy
X-BeenThere: 93attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Mailing list of IETF 93 attendees that have opted in on this list. " <93attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/93attendees>, <mailto:93attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/93attendees/>
List-Post: <mailto:93attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:93attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/93attendees>, <mailto:93attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 25 Jul 2015 10:54:38 -0000
On Sat, 25 Jul 2015, Mikael Abrahamsson wrote: > I would not have had a problem with the entire team (men and women) wearing > the same type of outfit, so they all had matching tight "sexy" clothing, my > problem was that only the women did. I don't really care if the women were > engineers or not, it's ok to have mascots, but then you need to have mascots > of (in this case) both genitesders to avoid the "booth babe" problem. That only addresses the problem of misogyny, not the problem of using non-technical (sexy) arguments for advertising products or services that are of interest to the IETF community. The bits & bites is not the CeBIT, there is no need to result to trickery to get the attention of attendees. (apart from the bites which targets everyone equally) Adding booth boys is not the solution :P Paul
- Re: [93attendees] IETF dress code policy Rodriguez, Iben
- Re: [93attendees] IETF dress code policy Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [93attendees] IETF dress code policy Lisa Lorenzin
- [93attendees] Name tags (was: IETF dress code pol… Lou Berger
- Re: [93attendees] IETF dress code policy Stephen Farrell
- Re: [93attendees] IETF dress code policy Kathleen Moriarty
- Re: [93attendees] IETF dress code policy Robert Moskowitz
- Re: [93attendees] IETF dress code policy Stephane Bortzmeyer
- Re: [93attendees] IETF dress code policy Stephane Bortzmeyer
- Re: [93attendees] IETF dress code policy Michael StJohns
- Re: [93attendees] IETF dress code policy Paul Kyzivat
- Re: [93attendees] IETF dress code policy Robert Moskowitz
- Re: [93attendees] IETF dress code policy Pat (Patricia) Thaler
- Re: [93attendees] IETF dress code policy Robert Moskowitz
- Re: [93attendees] IETF dress code policy Fred Baker (fred)
- Re: [93attendees] IETF dress code policy Robert Moskowitz
- Re: [93attendees] IETF dress code policy Fred Baker (fred)
- Re: [93attendees] IETF dress code policy Warren Kumari
- Re: [93attendees] IETF dress code policy Richard Scheffenegger
- Re: [93attendees] IETF dress code policy Luis Balbinot
- Re: [93attendees] IETF dress code policy Dave Taht
- Re: [93attendees] IETF dress code policy Randy Bush
- Re: [93attendees] IETF dress code policy Alexandre PETRESCU
- Re: [93attendees] IETF dress code policy Warren Kumari
- Re: [93attendees] IETF dress code policy Warren Kumari
- Re: [93attendees] IETF dress code policy Ted Lemon
- Re: [93attendees] IETF dress code policy Ted Lemon
- Re: [93attendees] IETF dress code policy Василий Долматов
- Re: [93attendees] IETF dress code policy Fred Baker (fred)
- Re: [93attendees] IETF dress code policy Ole Jacobsen
- Re: [93attendees] IETF dress code policy Ladislav Lhotka
- Re: [93attendees] IETF dress code policy Randall Gellens
- Re: [93attendees] IETF dress code policy Michal Krsek
- Re: [93attendees] IETF dress code policy Dave Crocker
- Re: [93attendees] IETF dress code policy Randy Bush
- Re: [93attendees] IETF dress code policy Jane Coffin
- [93attendees] Thank you! (Was Re: IETF dress code… Lou Berger
- Re: [93attendees] IETF dress code policy Bert Wijnen (IETF)
- Re: [93attendees] IETF dress code policy Niels ten Oever
- Re: [93attendees] IETF dress code policy John Scudder
- Re: [93attendees] IETF dress code policy Mikael Abrahamsson
- Re: [93attendees] IETF dress code policy Leif Johansson
- Re: [93attendees] IETF dress code policy Paul Wouters
- Re: [93attendees] IETF dress code policy Samuel Weiler
- Re: [93attendees] IETF dress code policy Ted Lemon
- Re: [93attendees] IETF dress code policy Leif Johansson
- Re: [93attendees] IETF dress code policy Daniel Harkins
- Re: [93attendees] IETF dress code policy Jeff Haas
- Re: [93attendees] IETF dress code policy Niels ten Oever
- Re: [93attendees] IETF dress code policy Randall Gellens
- Re: [93attendees] IETF dress code policy Randall Gellens