IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [93attendees] Meeting schedule

Randall Gellens <randy@qti.qualcomm.com> Tue, 21 July 2015 09:37 UTC

Return-Path: <randy@qti.qualcomm.com>
X-Original-To: 93attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 93attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80EBC1A87F0; Tue, 21 Jul 2015 02:37:01 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.011
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.011 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mCEUxgiqq8oD; Tue, 21 Jul 2015 02:36:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from wolverine01.qualcomm.com (wolverine01.qualcomm.com [199.106.114.254]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9FDA41B2BA0; Tue, 21 Jul 2015 02:36:59 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=qti.qualcomm.com; i=@qti.qualcomm.com; q=dns/txt; s=qcdkim; t=1437471419; x=1469007419; h=message-id:in-reply-to:references:date:to:from:subject: cc:mime-version; bh=9cD+dk3mkvlCVMyKjBVGBLWV6QIVrpvZaXBPAkrFYaU=; b=ccTnsRgtbKNV2O5GKYHi+hreW0qXxwPD5dd+YYEHMzVpsJwVl9DKocCw FWcSaNqypCs+xswFWhFFUOUCyerMwnLh3vBuyc+OIbEWRpN27gqvy0aX1 02T0EeY759O1TdMs7jlGr0uJbc14ui7+yGwy52SUs9oWqIvKzB0xYvM0V 8=;
X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="5700,7163,7868"; a="128916839"
Received: from ironmsg04-r.qualcomm.com ([172.30.46.18]) by wolverine01.qualcomm.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 21 Jul 2015 02:36:59 -0700
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.15,514,1432623600"; d="scan'208";a="1019404643"
Received: from nasanexm02f.na.qualcomm.com ([10.85.0.87]) by Ironmsg04-R.qualcomm.com with ESMTP/TLS/RC4-SHA; 21 Jul 2015 02:36:59 -0700
Received: from [130.129.14.251] (10.80.80.8) by nasanexm02f.na.qualcomm.com (10.85.0.87) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1076.9; Tue, 21 Jul 2015 02:36:57 -0700
Message-ID: <p06240603d1d3c31599ff@[130.129.14.251]>
In-Reply-To: <CAJU8_nXo56kuodKCkWyWFW=sM95Hju216uPD_W3WyzSj3qiUrQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <p06240602d1d3231e977e@130.129.14.251> <alpine.OSX.2.01.1507201630210.60032@rabdullah.local> <D2E48F4F-CE89-4C1F-ACB4-85F219651A8C@juniper.net> <CAJU8_nXo56kuodKCkWyWFW=sM95Hju216uPD_W3WyzSj3qiUrQ@mail.gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Eudora for Mac OS X
Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2015 02:36:53 -0700
To: Kyle Rose <krose@krose.org>, Kireeti Kompella <kireeti@juniper.net>
From: Randall Gellens <randy@qti.qualcomm.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
X-Random-Sig-Tag: 1.0b28
X-Random-Sig-Tag: 1.0b28
X-Originating-IP: [10.80.80.8]
X-ClientProxiedBy: NASANEXM01F.na.qualcomm.com (10.85.0.32) To nasanexm02f.na.qualcomm.com (10.85.0.87)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/93attendees/fPTJEICukdU80P9VF0xEpwYWLZQ>
Cc: "IAOC@ietf.org" <IAOC@ietf.org>, Ole Jacobsen <olejacobsen@me.com>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, Randall Gellens <rg+ietf@qti.qualcomm.com>, "93attendees@ietf.org" <93attendees@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [93attendees] Meeting schedule
X-BeenThere: 93attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Mailing list of IETF 93 attendees that have opted in on this list. " <93attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/93attendees>, <mailto:93attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/93attendees/>
List-Post: <mailto:93attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:93attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/93attendees>, <mailto:93attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2015 09:37:01 -0000

At 5:14 AM -0400 7/21/15, Kyle Rose wrote:

>  I think the primary issue is that there are too many sessions per day,
>  presumably to minimize overlap. One could skip the late sessions if
>  desired (as I did yesterday), but in my case I was still unable to eat
>  dinner until 9:00 because I had dinner plans with fellow attendees who
>  *were* at those sessions. I'd almost rather the conference go one
>  additional day and otherwise be done by 6:00 every night.

I'd be fine with extending by an extra day, and/or having WG sessions 
on Sunday or later on Friday.

-- 
Randall Gellens
Opinions are personal;    facts are suspect;    I speak for myself only
-------------- Randomly selected tag: ---------------
Very funny, Scotty.  Now beam down my clothes.

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email