IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [93attendees] Meeting schedule

"DRAGE, Keith (Keith)" <keith.drage@alcatel-lucent.com> Wed, 22 July 2015 12:49 UTC

Return-Path: <keith.drage@alcatel-lucent.com>
X-Original-To: 93attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 93attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 221601B32E1; Wed, 22 Jul 2015 05:49:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.91
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.91 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id h9MagapARVme; Wed, 22 Jul 2015 05:49:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp-fr.alcatel-lucent.com (fr-hpida-esg-02.alcatel-lucent.com [135.245.210.21]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 23AE41B32DB; Wed, 22 Jul 2015 05:49:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from fr712usmtp2.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com (unknown [135.239.2.42]) by Websense Email Security Gateway with ESMTPS id EBB70A60AB722; Wed, 22 Jul 2015 12:48:57 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from FR711WXCHHUB02.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com (fr711wxchhub02.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com [135.239.2.112]) by fr712usmtp2.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com (GMO) with ESMTP id t6MCmxsX005773 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Wed, 22 Jul 2015 14:49:00 +0200
Received: from FR712WXCHMBA11.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com ([169.254.7.203]) by FR711WXCHHUB02.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com ([135.239.2.112]) with mapi id 14.03.0195.001; Wed, 22 Jul 2015 14:48:59 +0200
From: "DRAGE, Keith (Keith)" <keith.drage@alcatel-lucent.com>
To: joel jaeggli <joelja@bogus.com>, Jeff Haas <jhaas@juniper.net>, "dcrocker@bbiw.net" <dcrocker@bbiw.net>
Thread-Topic: [93attendees] Meeting schedule
Thread-Index: AQHQxHkxuSS4T7Z5+0Kuhe6chxndwp3nbukw
Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2015 12:48:58 +0000
Message-ID: <949EF20990823C4C85C18D59AA11AD8B69749532@FR712WXCHMBA11.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com>
References: <p06240602d1d3231e977e@130.129.14.251> <alpine.OSX.2.01.1507201630210.60032@rabdullah.local> <D2E48F4F-CE89-4C1F-ACB4-85F219651A8C@juniper.net> <CAJU8_nXo56kuodKCkWyWFW=sM95Hju216uPD_W3WyzSj3qiUrQ@mail.gmail.com> <p06240603d1d3c31599ff@[130.129.14.251]> <55AE1BF9.6060407@gmail.com> <55AE3545.4050403@dcrocker.net> <779EF8F4-84AD-449B-9314-84693807D8CC@juniper.net> <55AF2805.90300@bogus.com>
In-Reply-To: <55AF2805.90300@bogus.com>
Accept-Language: en-GB, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [135.239.27.40]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/93attendees/g-MXOEKHUIAk9bQp42y1M0zE8s0>
Cc: "IAOC@ietf.org" <IAOC@ietf.org>, Ole Jacobsen <olejacobsen@me.com>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, "93attendees@ietf.org" <93attendees@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [93attendees] Meeting schedule
X-BeenThere: 93attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Mailing list of IETF 93 attendees that have opted in on this list. " <93attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/93attendees>, <mailto:93attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/93attendees/>
List-Post: <mailto:93attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:93attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/93attendees>, <mailto:93attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2015 12:49:04 -0000

In IETF 89 STRAW and AVTEXT got scheduled to meet in parallel in two different rooms (in a slot longer than either of us had requested), and we agreed with AD/secretariat to meet sequentially in the same room. There was no specific handover time (beyond an estimate on the agenda), the second group started a few minutes after the previous group finished.

Partly as a result of this, for IETF 90 they agreed to make more 1 hour slots available, although possible they could still go even further in this direction.

Keith

> -----Original Message-----
> From: 93attendees [mailto:93attendees-bounces@ietf.org] On 
> Behalf Of joel jaeggli
> Sent: 22 July 2015 06:20
> To: Jeff Haas; dcrocker@bbiw.net
> Cc: IAOC@ietf.org; Ole Jacobsen; The IESG; 93attendees@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [93attendees] Meeting schedule
> 
> On 7/21/15 2:14 PM, Jeff Haas wrote:
> > 
> >> On Jul 21, 2015, at 2:04 PM, Dave Crocker <dhc@dcrocker.net> wrote:
> >>
> >> We should be looking for ways to reduce the number of 
> meeting hours, 
> >> not to increase them.
> > 
> > How well have we done the last few meetings, including this 
> one, at having full session times?  If we have fractional 
> sessions, do we have any possibility of squeezing two groups 
> into a single room?
> 
> sunset4/v6ops
> pim/mboned
> opsarea/opsawg
> 
> > -- Jeff
> > 
> > 
> 
> 
>

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email