Re: [93attendees] Meeting schedule

"Howard, Lee" <lee.howard@twcable.com> Tue, 21 July 2015 05:47 UTC

Return-Path: <lee.howard@twcable.com>
X-Original-To: 93attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 93attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B50851ACEE7 for <93attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 20 Jul 2015 22:47:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.475
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.475 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HELO_EQ_MODEMCABLE=0.768, HOST_EQ_MODEMCABLE=1.368, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hI77THGTeUxN for <93attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 20 Jul 2015 22:47:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from cdpipgw01.twcable.com (cdpipgw01.twcable.com [165.237.59.22]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97C0E1ACEE6 for <93attendees@ietf.org>; Mon, 20 Jul 2015 22:47:06 -0700 (PDT)
X-SENDER-IP: 10.136.163.10
X-SENDER-REPUTATION: None
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.15,513,1432612800"; d="scan'208";a="913167826"
Received: from unknown (HELO PRVPEXHUB01.corp.twcable.com) ([10.136.163.10]) by cdpipgw01.twcable.com with ESMTP/TLS/RC4-MD5; 21 Jul 2015 01:40:27 -0400
Received: from PRVPEXVS08.corp.twcable.com ([10.136.163.37]) by PRVPEXHUB01.corp.twcable.com ([10.136.163.10]) with mapi; Tue, 21 Jul 2015 01:47:04 -0400
From: "Howard, Lee" <lee.howard@twcable.com>
To: Randall Gellens <rg+ietf@qti.qualcomm.com>, "93attendees@ietf.org" <93attendees@ietf.org>
Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2015 01:47:03 -0400
Thread-Topic: [93attendees] Meeting schedule
Thread-Index: AdDDeKthDNDRbPsxTvS886Run6imlw==
Message-ID: <D1D3A8BC.B9A03%Lee.Howard@twcable.com>
References: <p06240602d1d3231e977e@[130.129.14.251]>
In-Reply-To: <p06240602d1d3231e977e@[130.129.14.251]>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.5.2.150604
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/93attendees/gZvyqjxdRw3x3ObbTJRB90KsE0M>
Subject: Re: [93attendees] Meeting schedule
X-BeenThere: 93attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Mailing list of IETF 93 attendees that have opted in on this list. " <93attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/93attendees>, <mailto:93attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/93attendees/>
List-Post: <mailto:93attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:93attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/93attendees>, <mailto:93attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2015 05:47:08 -0000

I haven¹t gone back to look at all previous meeting schedules, but I
looked at the most recent one:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/92/agenda.html

WG meetings ended at 1830 or 1840 daily. Plenaries started late, as
with Social, Bits-n-Bites, but at least the latter two provided food.

So is it the case that daytime plenaries tacked on an hour to the
schedule? That effort failed, because after just one day of meetings, I¹m
going to miss the tech plenary, because I need a nap after my breakfast
meeting.

Lee


On 7/21/15, 12:16 AM, "93attendees on behalf of Randall Gellens"
<93attendees-bounces@ietf.org on behalf of rg+ietf@qti.qualcomm.com> wrote:

>The meeting schedule, in my view, runs too late in the evening.
>Tonight's session ended at 7:50 PM, meaning it was 8:15 before one
>could even start trying to go to dinner.  This means it's 9:00 before
>one is able to eat, which in my view, is far too late.  I know people
>hated the old-old schedule that went until 10, but at least that had
>a dinner break at a 6:00, a reasonable hour; if we absolutely must go
>late, that was a better way to do it.  The schedule this time forces
>people to either try to sleep on a full stomach (which I can't do),
>skip dinner, or stay up way late and be sleep-deprived, fueled by
>caffeine and adrenaline (which I think makes for very bad meetings
>and bad technical work).
>
>--
>Randall Gellens
>Opinions are personal;    facts are suspect;    I speak for myself only
>-------------- Randomly selected tag: ---------------
>It seems like the less a statesman amounts to, the more he loves
>the flag.
>
>_______________________________________________
>93attendees mailing list
>93attendees@ietf.org
>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/93attendees


This E-mail and any of its attachments may contain Time Warner Cable proprietary information, which is privileged, confidential, or subject to copyright belonging to Time Warner Cable. This E-mail is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient of this E-mail, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, copying, or action taken in relation to the contents of and attachments to this E-mail is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this E-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately and permanently delete the original and any copy of this E-mail and any printout.