IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [93attendees] Meeting schedule

Kireeti Kompella <kireeti@juniper.net> Mon, 20 July 2015 23:48 UTC

Return-Path: <kireeti@juniper.net>
X-Original-To: 93attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 93attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC35C1ACAD5; Mon, 20 Jul 2015 16:48:36 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.902
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.902 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Pj6Hm9A-dvxQ; Mon, 20 Jul 2015 16:48:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from na01-bn1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-bn1on0708.outbound.protection.outlook.com [IPv6:2a01:111:f400:fc10::708]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 41A811ACAD4; Mon, 20 Jul 2015 16:48:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from SN1PR0501MB1840.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (10.163.131.150) by SN1PR0501MB1840.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (10.163.131.150) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.1.213.14; Mon, 20 Jul 2015 23:48:15 +0000
Received: from SN1PR0501MB1840.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([10.163.131.150]) by SN1PR0501MB1840.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([10.163.131.150]) with mapi id 15.01.0213.021; Mon, 20 Jul 2015 23:48:15 +0000
From: Kireeti Kompella <kireeti@juniper.net>
To: Ole Jacobsen <olejacobsen@me.com>
Thread-Topic: [93attendees] Meeting schedule
Thread-Index: AQHQwzm4D6BIFMRUc060NorLp3ZfWp3lBFaAgAACTSQ=
Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2015 23:48:15 +0000
Message-ID: <D2E48F4F-CE89-4C1F-ACB4-85F219651A8C@juniper.net>
References: <p06240602d1d3231e977e@[130.129.14.251]>, <alpine.OSX.2.01.1507201630210.60032@rabdullah.local>
In-Reply-To: <alpine.OSX.2.01.1507201630210.60032@rabdullah.local>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
authentication-results: juniper.net; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;
x-originating-ip: [31.133.139.56]
x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1; SN1PR0501MB1840; 5:Z6pfKF8D3Xul2RFw/1sTj6Bdc6Gqq/Q9BiSIElwghhFc6HwfUj7ttkrX3amHgd6A/UTyDAxtPTN0b8e8gwmfQ8+vYmrfI4IbCbS6LC4pmXQ1tqwvlhhS6tONwTpYEfHtBFfivoQpMdyCJUVkA7QYfQ==; 24:hJIHlvijWlhaVUeEgVf2M6cvfdaShQVqTCpfnPKyNwrMGzaC20j5OZLknQJ7lhaYndVeECuuI3oI72G487N1Ae1wdt0DSfHRlWqOXsrFRjs=; 20:7AHT0H9KEHpVYUgDUHTz+zY4HvZuxL612LZQl9M6+M3FxidYrUirj1keZZTZKJTxwFiH7YZxnkNoAOv6vLw2RQ==
x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:;BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:;SRVR:SN1PR0501MB1840;
sn1pr0501mb1840: X-MS-Exchange-Organization-RulesExecuted
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <SN1PR0501MB1840E94C98566F2999D3AE23B9850@SN1PR0501MB1840.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
x-exchange-antispam-report-test: UriScan:;
x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(601004)(5005006)(3002001); SRVR:SN1PR0501MB1840; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:; SRVR:SN1PR0501MB1840;
x-forefront-prvs: 0643BDA83C
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(6009001)(377454003)(24454002)(54356999)(102836002)(77096005)(15975445007)(99286002)(106116001)(87936001)(110136002)(189998001)(62966003)(5002640100001)(66066001)(77156002)(50986999)(76176999)(92566002)(19580395003)(2950100001)(19580405001)(83716003)(33656002)(2656002)(122556002)(40100003)(46102003)(86362001)(82746002)(36756003)(7059030)(104396002)(6606295002); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:SN1PR0501MB1840; H:SN1PR0501MB1840.namprd05.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; MLV:sfv; LANG:en;
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: juniper.net
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 20 Jul 2015 23:48:15.2207 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: bea78b3c-4cdb-4130-854a-1d193232e5f4
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: SN1PR0501MB1840
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/93attendees/hTCbIwrDsTzkk_D1FmXzYEc2rfI>
Cc: "IAOC@ietf.org" <IAOC@ietf.org>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, Randall Gellens <rg+ietf@qti.qualcomm.com>, "93attendees@ietf.org" <93attendees@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [93attendees] Meeting schedule
X-BeenThere: 93attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Mailing list of IETF 93 attendees that have opted in on this list. " <93attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/93attendees>, <mailto:93attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/93attendees/>
List-Post: <mailto:93attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:93attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/93attendees>, <mailto:93attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2015 23:48:36 -0000

Speaking for myself, I far prefer this schedule to one that constrains you to an hour and a half of dinner, and wants you to then come back and meet some more. 

Kireeti.

> On Jul 21, 2015, at 01:40, Ole Jacobsen <olejacobsen@me.com> wrote:
> 
> 
>> On Mon, 20 Jul 2015, Randall Gellens wrote:
>> 
>> The meeting schedule, in my view, runs too late in the evening. Tonight's
>> session ended at 7:50 PM, meaning it was 8:15 before one could even start
>> trying to go to dinner.  This means it's 9:00 before one is able to eat, which
>> in my view, is far too late.  I know people hated the old-old schedule that
>> went until 10, but at least that had a dinner break at a 6:00, a reasonable
>> hour; if we absolutely must go late, that was a better way to do it.  The
>> schedule this time forces people to either try to sleep on a full stomach
>> (which I can't do), skip dinner, or stay up way late and be sleep-deprived,
>> fueled by caffeine and adrenaline (which I think makes for very bad meetings
>> and bad technical work).
>> 
>> -- 
>> Randall Gellens
>> Opinions are personal;    facts are suspect;    I speak for myself only
> 
> Randall,
> 
> I agree with you, but the topic deserves discussion beyond the current 
> attendee list, so I have taken the liberty of copying the IESG and 
> IAOC on this reply.
> 
> As you know, the "European dinner schedule" was introduced at one of 
> our Paris meetings to account for the fact that many restaurants there 
> would not even be open at our previous 17:30 - 18:00 end time. It 
> seems that some of our current end times have slipped beyond the 
> original concept, so I think this deserves some further discussion.
> 
> (Of course I have a personal interest in this since I am arranging an 
> event in Yokohama that I am hoping to start at 19:00, but I still 
> agree that we need to re-think the schedule)
> 
> Ole Jacobsen
> Principal without Chorus
> Organdemo.info
> http://www.yokohama-organdemo.org/
> 
> _______________________________________________
> 93attendees mailing list
> 93attendees@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/93attendees

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email