Re: [93attendees] pocket knife in Prague

Toerless Eckert <eckert@cisco.com> Sat, 11 July 2015 19:10 UTC

Return-Path: <eckert@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: 93attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 93attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 330DD1A8876 for <93attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 11 Jul 2015 12:10:12 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -11.811
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-11.811 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.8, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1FW9b2JrJEBn for <93attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 11 Jul 2015 12:10:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-3.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-3.cisco.com [173.37.86.74]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 038FD1A8869 for <93attendees@ietf.org>; Sat, 11 Jul 2015 12:10:10 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1262; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1436641811; x=1437851411; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=o64iRBMW9l5jexVGCGtJPwePiJlGeaTAkJvoc3Q1w8Y=; b=YXHtiycCLN1uPELFFonQ/GB/Ujj0qovPYCqTKUFwaLSqTAOkHeFX9mdm D7lpZaTTXULDS02pU2d1LU/PVCY0bLwxk93HS0z7xYTlhTqPr0EG9KzG8 vhLHWopGYKejRhfwok2Xxs9lMvW0nIcAIWNmKx242vDG6txB5bnNXYEqL 4=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0BtBQCraaFV/5ldJa1cgxS8eoQmg0QCgSU5EwEBAQEBAQGBCoQkAQEEOj8QCxgJJQ8FSYhBxFoBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEXi0yEN08HhCsFjCxwhxWMAwGYayYegW4cgXMegnwBAQE
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.15,454,1432598400"; d="scan'208";a="14605122"
Received: from rcdn-core-2.cisco.com ([173.37.93.153]) by rcdn-iport-3.cisco.com with ESMTP; 11 Jul 2015 19:10:10 +0000
Received: from mcast-linux1.cisco.com (mcast-linux1.cisco.com [172.27.244.121]) by rcdn-core-2.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id t6BJA9Nn000466 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sat, 11 Jul 2015 19:10:09 GMT
Received: from mcast-linux1.cisco.com (localhost.cisco.com [127.0.0.1]) by mcast-linux1.cisco.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id t6BJA9FF013431; Sat, 11 Jul 2015 12:10:09 -0700
Received: (from eckert@localhost) by mcast-linux1.cisco.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) id t6BJA9Wf013430; Sat, 11 Jul 2015 12:10:09 -0700
Date: Sat, 11 Jul 2015 12:10:09 -0700
From: Toerless Eckert <eckert@cisco.com>
To: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
Message-ID: <20150711191009.GH23837@cisco.com>
References: <55A02612.2090308@queuefull.net> <3B7B8B99-DE15-4E89-B491-C4A133025163@nic.cz> <4F9CE350-9E08-4B36-92D1-375BF75DA942@arbor.net> <55A13E5F.4010703@lacnic.net> <20150711171257.GF23837@cisco.com> <m2lhemy4fy.wl%randy@psg.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <m2lhemy4fy.wl%randy@psg.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/93attendees/i78CKBx8DCh19K6xJ8_VwctEwq8>
Cc: attendees <93attendees@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [93attendees] pocket knife in Prague
X-BeenThere: 93attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Mailing list of IETF 93 attendees that have opted in on this list. " <93attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/93attendees>, <mailto:93attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/93attendees/>
List-Post: <mailto:93attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:93attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/93attendees>, <mailto:93attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 11 Jul 2015 19:10:12 -0000

IMHO not much sense in annoying seurity personnel if they are only
following explicit security theater rules that they have to adhere to.
Which is why i would like to understand better what power of decision
is actually given to them so i recognize when someone acts out of spite.

Luckily i did not have any such experience with security check personnel.
The only case of someone acting in spite was a U.S. immigrations officer
in clear violation of written DHS regulations (which alas i only figured
out afterwards and i had forgotten to get his name).

And i simply participate on the cycle of ebay with leatherman micras
that i on and off have to relinquish on the airport when i've again
forgotten to adjust my key ring for air travel.

On Sat, Jul 11, 2015 at 10:44:33AM -0700, Randy Bush wrote:
> delaying you is airport security's main tactic for knives, bottle
> openers, sex toys, confiture, and anything else they don't like (or if
> they just don't like you).  when i have a long time before or between
> flights, i occasionally amuse myself by letting it play out, asking for
> a supervisor, ...  it is amusing when they realize they are hoist by
> their own petard (excuse english idiom badly stolen from french).
> 
> randy