Re: [93attendees] IETF dress code policy

Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie> Fri, 24 July 2015 10:52 UTC

Return-Path: <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
X-Original-To: 93attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 93attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C21AC1A8F3B for <93attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 24 Jul 2015 03:52:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.711
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.711 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, J_CHICKENPOX_45=0.6, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id B3DixOYmnb4j for <93attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 24 Jul 2015 03:52:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mercury.scss.tcd.ie (mercury.scss.tcd.ie [134.226.56.6]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0FB651A8AB6 for <93attendees@ietf.org>; Fri, 24 Jul 2015 03:52:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mercury.scss.tcd.ie (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5B3BBE59; Fri, 24 Jul 2015 11:52:13 +0100 (IST)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at scss.tcd.ie
Received: from mercury.scss.tcd.ie ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mercury.scss.tcd.ie [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GDWqHwQIYlGK; Fri, 24 Jul 2015 11:52:12 +0100 (IST)
Received: from [31.133.179.222] (dhcp-b3de.meeting.ietf.org [31.133.179.222]) by mercury.scss.tcd.ie (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D22BDBE49; Fri, 24 Jul 2015 11:52:11 +0100 (IST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cs.tcd.ie; s=mail; t=1437735132; bh=mxcl4Mdz2SwKEXmcrboVSNXLgKjG5Q0XY9SdclYCCLk=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=M2plCb4uVoNwyuV4/8C3ACbwuIbpi5os/7HQ/KW4stGMsfay7oFaCN2TNTdS4l8Ll 88prN1SuPtOm72Ewef4Ev7VwdC9tw+6387xGV4HMG/4EwvL9KIe6zMFV/OmH+/X4eZ zSCiQAJ0MTZGGO62HKY/2VyQnRvF9DojVSvYZMZs=
Message-ID: <55B218DB.6010603@cs.tcd.ie>
Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2015 11:52:11 +0100
From: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.8.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Lisa Lorenzin <llorenzin@pulsesecure.net>, "Rodriguez, Iben" <Iben.Rodriguez@spirent.com>, Ondrej Filip <ondrej.filip@nic.cz>, "93attendees@ietf.org" <93attendees@ietf.org>
References: <28B1F49A-AAE4-429F-B70E-6783040FE829@spirent.com> <BN1PR06MB4371C7F6FE511FAD63C2FE8A8810@BN1PR06MB437.namprd06.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To: <BN1PR06MB4371C7F6FE511FAD63C2FE8A8810@BN1PR06MB437.namprd06.prod.outlook.com>
OpenPGP: id=D66EA7906F0B897FB2E97D582F3C8736805F8DA2; url=
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/93attendees/mHfqU_jQ6vALeEu97-i1y6h_ahQ>
Subject: Re: [93attendees] IETF dress code policy
X-BeenThere: 93attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Mailing list of IETF 93 attendees that have opted in on this list. " <93attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/93attendees>, <mailto:93attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/93attendees/>
List-Post: <mailto:93attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:93attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/93attendees>, <mailto:93attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2015 10:52:23 -0000

I reckon that it'll be better if the IAOC just find and copy some
good policy that will prevent a recurrance of this. I know there are
some trade shows that have introduced such policies so I'd hope
we don't have to figure this out ourselves via a protracted list
discussion of possibilities.

S.

On 24/07/15 11:47, Lisa Lorenzin wrote:
> My impression was that we were discussing setting an IETF policy to prohibit booth babes / scantily dressed women at vendor tables who are present strictly as sexualized objects.  That's a far cry from a dress code for attendees.
> 
> Personally, if a lead developer / engineer at a Bits & Bytes demo was wearing heels, the only reason I would care would be to ask her (or him) what brand they are - heels comfortable enough to wear for a standup job like booth duty are few & far between! :)
> 
> Regards,
> Lisa
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: 93attendees [mailto:93attendees-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Rodriguez, Iben
> Sent: Friday, July 24, 2015 12:38 PM
> To: Ondrej Filip; 93attendees@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [93attendees] IETF dress code policy
> 
> Of course there are 2 sides to every story.  I’ve had to deal with this as a parent of teen age daughters who are experiencing this type of reverse discrimination based on the way they dress at school.  If a teacher were to tell them their clothing style is distracting to the boys in the class we have a talk with that teacher there, and the boys.  Unfortunately the girls need to deal with this too but the world is changing. 
> 
> I came to the conference for the first time with a suit coat and jacket ready to dress up as if for a business meeting. When I checked in I see everyone in t-shirts and shorts. This is great!  
> 
> Let’s not pass judgement on someone’s role or respectful dress situation these days. It goes both ways.
> 
> Our efforts should be on improving the rights for those that are truly oppressed by their cultural situation.
> 
> Are we seriously thinking of instituting a dress code policy for these events? How would it read?  Let’s not go down this road.
> 
> 
> On 7/24/15, 11:35 AM, "93attendees on behalf of Ondrej Filip" <93attendees-bounces@ietf.org <mailto:93attendees-bounces@ietf.org>  on behalf of ondrej.filip@nic.cz <mailto:ondrej.filip@nic.cz> > wrote:
> 
> Hello!
> First of all let me to apologize everybody who felt offended. I am really sorry for that we did something unfortunate and as a CEO of the company I take the full responsibility.
> 
> Please, let me explain the background. Those ladies have been working with CZ.NIC for a longer time although not as full time employees.
> But I am telling this to explain that they we have not employed them just for the purpose of this event. Both have university degrees although not a technical background in IETF related stuff. But they know our company very well.
> 
> Again, I fully understand the point and I apologize for our lack of sensitivity. I am very sorry.
> 
> Ondrej Filip
> 
> 
> 
> On 24.7.2015 10:31, Jose Saldana wrote:
> 
> 	Hi all,
> 	In my opinion, the bits&bytes booth with the young ladies in short skirts, etc. was a bit... let's say ... disrespectful.
> 	I mean, using women just for "decorative" purposes is something I don't like. It is common in trade fairs, sports events, etc. But the IETF should avoid it (IMHO).
> 	Best regards,
> 	Jose
> 	Sent from my smartphone
> 	_______________________________________________
> 	93attendees mailing list
> 	93attendees@ietf.org <mailto:93attendees@ietf.org> 
> 	https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/93attendees
> 
> 
>