IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [93attendees] Meeting schedule

"Andrew G. Malis" <agmalis@gmail.com> Tue, 21 July 2015 08:27 UTC

Return-Path: <agmalis@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: 93attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 93attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98AC61B2AA7; Tue, 21 Jul 2015 01:27:53 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fZuF9pQC9zD5; Tue, 21 Jul 2015 01:27:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wi0-x234.google.com (mail-wi0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c05::234]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4C17F1B2A97; Tue, 21 Jul 2015 01:27:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by wibud3 with SMTP id ud3so119548772wib.0; Tue, 21 Jul 2015 01:27:47 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=/H5dueAALtj1dfv9mJybizlpSZiPYilzUWvivIeoxws=; b=DvJwTLrkVxSYq2hA2T/Bf05ne1UELXJ6PeBnjNW8A2zY96qnLYxnNMwiLlw2Urp2SV DMbjp+BaTJM4zfSWUvtk4yuQVZIzipBReGh2+TjVrow66gqh3kpMQXtfamnal891WO8F XI7m40KksBLAbYOXLqn6SXZo03qrka1GGSIlQlpP51YWXszwdpeQ6+L40SRICLpPp2Yw NyvkmLhw3LUYTqyGuzhxb6XdaZwzg1PomlG+Kt7C/vyRuEPETlIkX09ZsnizZwsWOuLf l2zbSoZa9F2sy+i+9H+9o8DcJB2/PSPZezwkrMN8me4StHl+WreozfcHpZq0+2fX/zoj KeFw==
X-Received: by 10.194.22.105 with SMTP id c9mr68393231wjf.120.1437467267068; Tue, 21 Jul 2015 01:27:47 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.28.154.5 with HTTP; Tue, 21 Jul 2015 01:27:27 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAG4d1rf2FHk6Qdc71VjQ2_oib9Cx1o5wm6SHbfXcWZNEur68GQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <p06240602d1d3231e977e@130.129.14.251> <alpine.OSX.2.01.1507201630210.60032@rabdullah.local> <D2E48F4F-CE89-4C1F-ACB4-85F219651A8C@juniper.net> <alpine.OSX.2.01.1507201650211.60032@rabdullah.local> <55ADCF31.20706@gmail.com> <A58586E3-63BA-431C-A85F-0DFCF913A328@gmail.com> <CAA=duU0amy4N1R4gZpRUEqGj-AoGnhdin-Xp7L8g7XpEAAr59A@mail.gmail.com> <CAG4d1rf2FHk6Qdc71VjQ2_oib9Cx1o5wm6SHbfXcWZNEur68GQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: "Andrew G. Malis" <agmalis@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2015 10:27:27 +0200
Message-ID: <CAA=duU3d=rt_MbOTKJYzuLuq_dDtGSPanTiUjw3bx8F-6KOF=g@mail.gmail.com>
To: Alia Atlas <akatlas@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7b5d978fd47a9a051b5e6dda
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/93attendees/mzwsN3OKmTdtdXcu_4LlMTN6u7o>
Cc: Kireeti Kompella <kireeti@juniper.net>, "IAOC@ietf.org" <IAOC@ietf.org>, Yoav Nir <ynir.ietf@gmail.com>, "93attendees@ietf.org" <93attendees@ietf.org>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, Ole Jacobsen <olejacobsen@me.com>, Randall Gellens <rg+ietf@qti.qualcomm.com>
Subject: Re: [93attendees] Meeting schedule
X-BeenThere: 93attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Mailing list of IETF 93 attendees that have opted in on this list. " <93attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/93attendees>, <mailto:93attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/93attendees/>
List-Post: <mailto:93attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:93attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/93attendees>, <mailto:93attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2015 08:27:53 -0000

Alia,

That must have been a particular issue for this hotel, becuase in most
other IETFs, the meeting rooms were opened up during the snack break for
the plenary.

Cheers,
Andy

On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 10:21 AM, Alia Atlas <akatlas@gmail.com> wrote:

> This IETF we had more WG meeting time requested than could be met.  With
> concern requested, the time requested did decrease.
>
> The plenaries are in the morning because it allows the rooms to be reset
> during lunch.  Having them in the evening would have eaten the meeting
> rooms for the time slot before the plenary which would have further
> decreased the available meeting time for WG meetings.
>
> I'm in the technical plenary now and it seems to be quite well attended.
>
> Regards,
> Alia
>
> On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 4:17 AM, Andrew G. Malis <agmalis@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> I also prefer going back to the plenaries at the end of the day. I
>> understand that having them in the morning is more convenient for the
>> hotel, but they're here to serve us, not vice versa.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Andy
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 7:15 AM, Yoav Nir <ynir.ietf@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> On Jul 21, 2015, at 6:48 AM, Brian E Carpenter <
>>> brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> >> And I agree with that as well! But the current long day, which for
>>> >> many includes breakfast meetings, runs 7am to [nearly] 8pm which
>>> >> probably does not contribute to overall productivity.
>>> >
>>> > As long as people want to arrive on Sunday and leave on Friday
>>> > afternoon, it's hard to see what to change.
>>>
>>> The two plenaries add up to 5 hours. If they didn’t take up real meeting
>>> time, we could shorten each meeting day by one hour.
>>>
>>> That would mean getting the plenaries back to the end of the day, and
>>> anyone who wanted an early dinner could skip them.
>>>
>>> But regardless, for “real IETF-ers”, the ones who don’t come for just a
>>> few sessions, an IETF week is always pretty intense.
>>>
>>> Yoav
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> 93attendees mailing list
>>> 93attendees@ietf.org
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/93attendees
>>>
>>
>>
>

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email