Re: [93attendees] Network experiment during the meeting

Dave Crocker <dhc@dcrocker.net> Wed, 15 July 2015 14:44 UTC

Return-Path: <dhc@dcrocker.net>
X-Original-To: 93attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 93attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91EE61AC40D for <93attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 15 Jul 2015 07:44:51 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dovY10Q-cDzV for <93attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 15 Jul 2015 07:44:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sbh17.songbird.com (sbh17.songbird.com [72.52.113.17]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 464171AC40C for <93attendees@ietf.org>; Wed, 15 Jul 2015 07:44:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.87] (76-218-10-206.lightspeed.sntcca.sbcglobal.net [76.218.10.206]) (authenticated bits=0) by sbh17.songbird.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id t6FEigNk012703 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT); Wed, 15 Jul 2015 07:44:46 -0700
Message-ID: <55A671D6.9020707@dcrocker.net>
Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2015 07:44:38 -0700
From: Dave Crocker <dhc@dcrocker.net>
Organization: Brandenburg InternetWorking
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Toerless Eckert <eckert@cisco.com>
References: <55A41BEB.3090102@hs-augsburg.de> <55A52719.1000208@gmail.com> <CAO_Rpc+-fQBU+MuOR03VHDgw3HcbOWPcThUR3nR2Vnj9CcM63w@mail.gmail.com> <C2443FFD-988C-4B31-ADB3-3AEAD994387A@isoc.org> <CAO_RpcKCYBxOW9eYLUCD2qiPuAQE3-tj8hwe_AXVJYUr+Y4h=g@mail.gmail.com> <D1CBF04C.50692%evyncke@cisco.com> <20150715121528.GA7114@puck.nether.net> <55A6629E.8050700@dcrocker.net> <20150715135804.GP1862@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <20150715135804.GP1862@cisco.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.0 (sbh17.songbird.com [72.52.113.66]); Wed, 15 Jul 2015 07:44:46 -0700 (PDT)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/93attendees/oeQZnr88TWsadh9X2TzD1lzWqmQ>
Cc: "93attendees@ietf.org" <93attendees@ietf.org>, Jared Mauch <jared@puck.Nether.net>
Subject: Re: [93attendees] Network experiment during the meeting
X-BeenThere: 93attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: dcrocker@bbiw.net
List-Id: "Mailing list of IETF 93 attendees that have opted in on this list. " <93attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/93attendees>, <mailto:93attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/93attendees/>
List-Post: <mailto:93attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:93attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/93attendees>, <mailto:93attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2015 14:44:51 -0000

On 7/15/2015 6:58 AM, Toerless Eckert wrote:
> The IETF is idemnifying everything participants say already via the note well,


On what basis does the Note Well constitute a guarantee of
indemnification for anyone.

And by the way, who do you believe is being indemnified by the IETF?

(In case there is confusion about the term:
http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/indemnify)

d/

-- 
Dave Crocker
Brandenburg InternetWorking
bbiw.net