IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [93attendees] Hilton Guest Room Internet Update

joel jaeggli <joelja@gmail.com> Thu, 23 July 2015 14:34 UTC

Return-Path: <joelja@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: 93attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 93attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 932BF1A87A6 for <93attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 23 Jul 2015 07:34:10 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OqqYuyXY9AqO for <93attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 23 Jul 2015 07:34:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wi0-x229.google.com (mail-wi0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c05::229]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C109C1A86E8 for <93attendees@ietf.org>; Thu, 23 Jul 2015 07:34:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by wibxm9 with SMTP id xm9so152417291wib.1 for <93attendees@ietf.org>; Thu, 23 Jul 2015 07:34:01 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=8fN8FypBG0FQm7bzCedvBPaMVPU5EF8cxeS2PWSLz7Q=; b=XGKD82kxtrYQNJvvbc6fCz6Cm3Dzew3aaaC7OtpETPFRFWBqGB8bAT/89LU63KTmRu ba7IKqyjJZX8xbNeWkFy87CCUAa0hgYYwA9A41cUdsPdirZdSUjE3k2LNng1f63XfzU0 yEbOKaV6ns+egBvVLFHDFGE4DplCNnzD90yM4LqUIvOGMYMmiuRzNfUd5K4ib2JGmtd9 5xGNtkVFSmOHmrfH3LodaSC4HEDiRrOTVBXTiIhv70OFxriKLnY/bRKbi+47oSPcGjns VDzwoAMwXoNifXFwOfrNZwbkF/6R7RW6Z1EE7X22kEzuyS8OSOmGLlbiEa0X8rPsvAjG zlEg==
X-Received: by 10.194.205.225 with SMTP id lj1mr16347749wjc.138.1437662041377; Thu, 23 Jul 2015 07:34:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dhcp-88a6.meeting.ietf.org ([2001:67c:370:136:5d67:14d4:8e9a:dc4a]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id s16sm27486153wib.16.2015.07.23.07.34.00 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 23 Jul 2015 07:34:00 -0700 (PDT)
To: "John G. Scudder" <jgs@juniper.net>
References: <FB562679-F7EC-4BC5-A66D-8F10300248F4@isc.org> <929706A3-EDA7-42E5-B8BF-D26F94479AE5@isoc.org> <82F50FE4-F546-4F75-BF3B-99537883ECD7@juniper.net> <55B0F987.2040308@gmail.com> <6F5FFFFE-6035-4C26-86BC-5FC3DEF58BA2@juniper.net>
From: joel jaeggli <joelja@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <55B0FB57.6030204@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2015 16:33:59 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.10; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <6F5FFFFE-6035-4C26-86BC-5FC3DEF58BA2@juniper.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/93attendees/omOaSGBNecM5tDw3T7DA5ty2fsk>
Cc: 93attendees@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [93attendees] Hilton Guest Room Internet Update
X-BeenThere: 93attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Mailing list of IETF 93 attendees that have opted in on this list. " <93attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/93attendees>, <mailto:93attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/93attendees/>
List-Post: <mailto:93attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:93attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/93attendees>, <mailto:93attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2015 14:34:10 -0000

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 7/23/15 4:29 PM, John G. Scudder wrote:
> On Jul 23, 2015, at 4:26 PM, joel jaeggli <joelja@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>> 
>> If your personal ap does 5Ghz (airport express for example) that
>> would make it less of an attractive nuisance.
>> 
>> In fact mimicking the hotel APs probably increases the complexity
>> of reasoning about the hotel network so that's maybe not the best
>> approach.
> 
> Given the popularity of personal APs and the fact it will probably
> continue or increase, it might not be a bad idea for the NOC team
> to publish a list of recommended practices for minimally-antisocial
> use of personal APs in advance of the meeting.

yup, I think this is in the cards.

thanks
joel

> --John
> 

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2
Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org

iEYEARECAAYFAlWw+1cACgkQ8AA1q7Z/VrI+uwCfcIQw1HH8G+V6vFPgdQ/rbLw+
AcAAn3cMVvXTwQExyVCmgpzwLQ28dXiy
=It3a
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email