IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [93attendees] [IAOC] Meeting schedule

Ted Lemon <ted.lemon@nominum.com> Tue, 21 July 2015 13:37 UTC

Return-Path: <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com>
X-Original-To: 93attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 93attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D4381B2DA2; Tue, 21 Jul 2015 06:37:01 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.909
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.909 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id O2VXIk8LWAi0; Tue, 21 Jul 2015 06:36:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sjc1-mx02-inside.nominum.com (sjc1-mx02-inside.nominum.com [64.89.234.25]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5E8E41B2DB8; Tue, 21 Jul 2015 06:36:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from webmail.nominum.com (cas-03.win.nominum.com [64.89.235.66]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "mail.nominum.com", Issuer "Go Daddy Secure Certificate Authority - G2" (verified OK)) by sjc1-mx02-inside.nominum.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 53CE3DA0089; Tue, 21 Jul 2015 13:36:58 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from [10.0.20.218] (71.233.41.235) by CAS-03.WIN.NOMINUM.COM (192.168.1.100) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.224.2; Tue, 21 Jul 2015 06:36:58 -0700
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_F52154F9-C8CF-4982-8D6A-45DA999F9081"
MIME-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.2 \(2102\))
From: Ted Lemon <ted.lemon@nominum.com>
In-Reply-To: <CY1PR09MB063485F125CB8D9AB103B6A8EA840@CY1PR09MB0634.namprd09.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2015 09:36:56 -0400
Message-ID: <61F876E9-F161-4E0B-8E3F-1B96B8C0F475@nominum.com>
References: <p06240602d1d3231e977e@130.129.14.251> <alpine.OSX.2.01.1507201630210.60032@rabdullah.local> <D2E48F4F-CE89-4C1F-ACB4-85F219651A8C@juniper.net> <CAJU8_nXo56kuodKCkWyWFW=sM95Hju216uPD_W3WyzSj3qiUrQ@mail.gmail.com> <p06240603d1d3c31599ff@[130.129.14.251]> <55AE1BF9.6060407@gmail.com> <55AE3545.4050403@dcrocker.net> <CY1PR09MB063444AFD8CFA87040CE4A79EA840@CY1PR09MB0634.namprd09.prod.outlook.com> <CY1PR09MB0634899D77D1B7C510AF92CCEA840@CY1PR09MB0634.namprd09.prod.outlook.com> <081364BF-3F03-4BFB-B5A6-FA2E7062041E@nominum.com> <alpine.OSX.2.01.1507210557550.62358@rabdullah.local> <B54303E8-2CAF-4762-9B75-E01DFDB67E72@nominum.com> <CY1PR09MB063485F125CB8D9AB103B6A8EA840@CY1PR09MB0634.namprd09.prod.outlook.com>
To: Henning Schulzrinne <Henning.Schulzrinne@fcc.gov>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.2102)
X-Originating-IP: [71.233.41.235]
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/93attendees/sZVOFLxNXoMXSi8_W-7MF_n1Q4A>
Cc: "iaoc@ietf.org" <IAOC@ietf.org>, Ole Jacobsen <olejacobsen@me.com>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, "93attendees@ietf.org" <93attendees@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [93attendees] [IAOC] Meeting schedule
X-BeenThere: 93attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Mailing list of IETF 93 attendees that have opted in on this list. " <93attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/93attendees>, <mailto:93attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/93attendees/>
List-Post: <mailto:93attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:93attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/93attendees>, <mailto:93attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2015 13:37:01 -0000

On Jul 21, 2015, at 9:29 AM, Henning Schulzrinne <Henning.Schulzrinne@fcc.gov> wrote:
> As long as the number of people with special food needs is smallish, this should be manageable, possibly at the cost of missing the first 15 minutes. This obviously works better in places like Prague, with plenty of take-out and grocery store options.

Impositions always seem small if you are not the one bearing them.   I would appreciate it if you could stop denying that the problem with your proposal that I have raised is a problem.   It may be that what I want is actually not important, but it’s a real problem for me, even if it’s not a problem for you.   Furthermore, solving the problem that we are making poor use of time during IETF f2f meetings by cramming the agenda with yet another interval when we don’t have a break is not going to solve the problem.   Instead, it’s going to result in more people skipping the plenary.

Why not instead solve the problem that we don’t make good use of IETF meeting time?

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email