Re: [93attendees] IETF dress code policy
Michal Krsek <michal@krsek.cz> Sat, 25 July 2015 08:13 UTC
Return-Path: <michal@krsek.cz>
X-Original-To: 93attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 93attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1])
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 911201A88E8
for <93attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 25 Jul 2015 01:13:12 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5
tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44])
by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id iQGTIoohu6fI for <93attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>;
Sat, 25 Jul 2015 01:13:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wi0-f176.google.com (mail-wi0-f176.google.com
[209.85.212.176])
(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 10F041A8A6E
for <93attendees@ietf.org>; Sat, 25 Jul 2015 01:13:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by wibud3 with SMTP id ud3so85983141wib.1
for <93attendees@ietf.org>; Sat, 25 Jul 2015 01:13:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
h=x-gm-message-state:content-type:mime-version:subject:from
:in-reply-to:date:cc:content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references
:to; bh=/wxB6ok0CZ3zBnw5qcw8j7RcoywijVXomfpbzUKyHdc=;
b=F9flCaXPjFMpmEU0KDEV+V1HNTQxC9F4Uvr2j+mtNtHSTWjkg4u3DtswA/iKTd7WP2
THHUtyPGfgQUGwz5ylnFWDoPbUtvJckfP2M59mKBXrV1mC20GSlx7R3Rk8QzCMvo/Hkb
k2nJ/ufi8mQCTU6nvHHflNHK8QyypvAdB+r9DC2MHm3VtSyvicVAEI2kN0u2iSGlri+g
GfEEtbcsTeTu5EMdaO/Va3K987U4Y1bdE1TmuhiJKjHi0MPLS84+4dOitteuMRh3Zw1z
lI64JcUOVRrIgHXTKJa6jp6M4k+KTIF76qrVgrfISkYUEMgH4RSFYtq98wJ1mhQCwji1
zNgA==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnshuFhiCLqkZnE9P4BL86GgZ/96bfATRAs1LoAb8mLc6o64xdMCZ+SWspqt6SEY8QlpYX3
X-Received: by 10.180.91.76 with SMTP id cc12mr4514758wib.67.1437811989818;
Sat, 25 Jul 2015 01:13:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.100.104] (ip-86-49-85-106.net.upcbroadband.cz.
[86.49.85.106])
by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id lj2sm2163387wic.1.2015.07.25.01.13.07
(version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128);
Sat, 25 Jul 2015 01:13:08 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset=utf-8
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
From: Michal Krsek <michal@krsek.cz>
X-Mailer: iPad Mail (12H143)
In-Reply-To: <B3F3B148-5FF1-4310-94C7-C61465866A14@nic.cz>
Date: Sat, 25 Jul 2015 10:13:07 +0200
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <640A154D-D92D-4593-AC8A-EEBAB5B154F1@krsek.cz>
References: <28B1F49A-AAE4-429F-B70E-6783040FE829@spirent.com>
<BN1PR06MB4371C7F6FE511FAD63C2FE8A8810@BN1PR06MB437.namprd06.prod.outlook.com>
<79BC3C72-BE65-40D6-86F4-16E3FF59FBED@cisco.com>
<EF2C4B5044B140219A923A23F8C155E7@srichardlxp2>
<B3F3B148-5FF1-4310-94C7-C61465866A14@nic.cz>
To: Ladislav Lhotka <lhotka@nic.cz>
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/93attendees/t2SYLEfdtEjkP9y169mhyVAKjrs>
Cc: Richard Scheffenegger <rscheff@gmx.at>,
Lisa Lorenzin <llorenzin@pulsesecure.net>, "Rodriguez,
Iben" <Iben.Rodriguez@spirent.com>, "Fred Baker \(fred\)" <fred@cisco.com>,
"93attendees@ietf.org" <93attendees@ietf.org>,
Ondrej Filip <ondrej.filip@nic.cz>
Subject: Re: [93attendees] IETF dress code policy
X-BeenThere: 93attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Mailing list of IETF 93 attendees that have opted in on this list. "
<93attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/93attendees>,
<mailto:93attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/93attendees/>
List-Post: <mailto:93attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:93attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/93attendees>,
<mailto:93attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 25 Jul 2015 08:13:12 -0000
>> >> I'm with Fred. >> >> However, having been attracted to their booth, I found in the discussions with the engineers present, that the level of expertise was not on-par with many of the questions... >> >> They would have had to bring the actual electrical and software engineers working on the product to the booth on events like this. > > I guess I have to protest here. You didn’t tell what questions you asked but, because I know the Turris team, the engineers that were there are all deeply involved in the Turris project. Of course, division of labor exists and nobody knows everything. seems to me we are really lost in the topic. At least some people guessing things that are not well alligned with reality nor context. Let me express a few sentences. 1) CZ.NIC is an association managing ccTLD and has almost nothing with commerce 2) The company itself is being managed the engineering way (thanks to members, board and management leaded by Ondrej Filip) 3) Almost all margin from ccTLD management is being consumed by engineering and development project provided to the Internet community (almost all of them under free licences - BIRD, KnotDNS, FRED, Turris) 4) CZ.NIC booth at bits-and-bites was well staffed by engineers (spotted about five or six of them) and I also oversight another three people that have engineering background and general Turris knowledge crawling around. 5) All those enginers were properly dressed - as engineers 6) CZ.NIC put a big effort to the IETF organisation (remember, this is not just about the money), being relativelly small organisation. 7) Need to repeat - CZ.NIC is not-for-profit organisation and does almost nothing in "sales" activities 8) If someone would ask me to help those ladies wearing something with 2D code anywhere, I'm happy to support such as activity joining them. So on my perspective - we need to thank CZ.NIC for supporting IETF and community of Internet engineers (providing free software and other projects) and we should help the event management to make Bits-and-bites form widely acceptable. As a side for folks trying to apply any dress code at social or at the event - please read a "1984" novel. With kind regards Michal Krsek Speaking for myself from Central Europe
- Re: [93attendees] IETF dress code policy Rodriguez, Iben
- Re: [93attendees] IETF dress code policy Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [93attendees] IETF dress code policy Lisa Lorenzin
- [93attendees] Name tags (was: IETF dress code pol… Lou Berger
- Re: [93attendees] IETF dress code policy Stephen Farrell
- Re: [93attendees] IETF dress code policy Kathleen Moriarty
- Re: [93attendees] IETF dress code policy Robert Moskowitz
- Re: [93attendees] IETF dress code policy Stephane Bortzmeyer
- Re: [93attendees] IETF dress code policy Stephane Bortzmeyer
- Re: [93attendees] IETF dress code policy Michael StJohns
- Re: [93attendees] IETF dress code policy Paul Kyzivat
- Re: [93attendees] IETF dress code policy Pat (Patricia) Thaler
- Re: [93attendees] IETF dress code policy Robert Moskowitz
- Re: [93attendees] IETF dress code policy Robert Moskowitz
- Re: [93attendees] IETF dress code policy Fred Baker (fred)
- Re: [93attendees] IETF dress code policy Robert Moskowitz
- Re: [93attendees] IETF dress code policy Fred Baker (fred)
- Re: [93attendees] IETF dress code policy Warren Kumari
- Re: [93attendees] IETF dress code policy Richard Scheffenegger
- Re: [93attendees] IETF dress code policy Luis Balbinot
- Re: [93attendees] IETF dress code policy Dave Taht
- Re: [93attendees] IETF dress code policy Randy Bush
- Re: [93attendees] IETF dress code policy Alexandre PETRESCU
- Re: [93attendees] IETF dress code policy Warren Kumari
- Re: [93attendees] IETF dress code policy Warren Kumari
- Re: [93attendees] IETF dress code policy Ted Lemon
- Re: [93attendees] IETF dress code policy Ted Lemon
- Re: [93attendees] IETF dress code policy Василий Долматов
- Re: [93attendees] IETF dress code policy Fred Baker (fred)
- Re: [93attendees] IETF dress code policy Ole Jacobsen
- Re: [93attendees] IETF dress code policy Ladislav Lhotka
- Re: [93attendees] IETF dress code policy Randall Gellens
- Re: [93attendees] IETF dress code policy Michal Krsek
- Re: [93attendees] IETF dress code policy Dave Crocker
- Re: [93attendees] IETF dress code policy Randy Bush
- Re: [93attendees] IETF dress code policy Jane Coffin
- [93attendees] Thank you! (Was Re: IETF dress code… Lou Berger
- Re: [93attendees] IETF dress code policy Bert Wijnen (IETF)
- Re: [93attendees] IETF dress code policy Niels ten Oever
- Re: [93attendees] IETF dress code policy John Scudder
- Re: [93attendees] IETF dress code policy Mikael Abrahamsson
- Re: [93attendees] IETF dress code policy Leif Johansson
- Re: [93attendees] IETF dress code policy Paul Wouters
- Re: [93attendees] IETF dress code policy Samuel Weiler
- Re: [93attendees] IETF dress code policy Ted Lemon
- Re: [93attendees] IETF dress code policy Leif Johansson
- Re: [93attendees] IETF dress code policy Daniel Harkins
- Re: [93attendees] IETF dress code policy Jeff Haas
- Re: [93attendees] IETF dress code policy Niels ten Oever
- Re: [93attendees] IETF dress code policy Randall Gellens
- Re: [93attendees] IETF dress code policy Randall Gellens