Re: [93attendees] making better uses of IETF f2f time
Dave Crocker <dhc@dcrocker.net> Tue, 21 July 2015 14:50 UTC
Return-Path: <dhc@dcrocker.net>
X-Original-To: 93attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 93attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1])
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 350411A889D
for <93attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 21 Jul 2015 07:50:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5
tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44])
by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id iVuUU33dTYei for <93attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>;
Tue, 21 Jul 2015 07:50:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sbh17.songbird.com (sbh17.songbird.com [72.52.113.17])
(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 39A871A017C
for <93attendees@ietf.org>; Tue, 21 Jul 2015 07:50:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [31.133.171.186] (dhcp-abba.meeting.ietf.org [31.133.171.186])
(authenticated bits=0)
by sbh17.songbird.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id t6LEoBxZ030404
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT);
Tue, 21 Jul 2015 07:50:12 -0700
References: <CAG4d1rfvZerx9A4vmEz2Bsub78bF-EL-_HST_sFZWGATrUfYCA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Alia Atlas <akatlas@gmail.com>
From: Dave Crocker <dhc@dcrocker.net>
X-Enigmail-Draft-Status: N1110
Organization: Brandenburg InternetWorking
Message-ID: <55AE5C23.7060707@dcrocker.net>
Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2015 16:50:11 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101
Thunderbird/38.1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAG4d1rfvZerx9A4vmEz2Bsub78bF-EL-_HST_sFZWGATrUfYCA@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.0
(sbh17.songbird.com [72.52.113.17]); Tue, 21 Jul 2015 07:50:13 -0700 (PDT)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/93attendees/t3bBZNwRIS_Dq44ehObAwvqGCCQ>
Cc: "93attendees@ietf.org" <93attendees@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [93attendees] making better uses of IETF f2f time
X-BeenThere: 93attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: dcrocker@bbiw.net
List-Id: "Mailing list of IETF 93 attendees that have opted in on this list. "
<93attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/93attendees>,
<mailto:93attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/93attendees/>
List-Post: <mailto:93attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:93attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/93attendees>,
<mailto:93attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2015 14:50:16 -0000
On 7/21/2015 4:24 PM, Alia Atlas wrote: > Dave and others, Alia, and others, Everything you describe is Goodness. More should do it. And perfection is not the goal. However in general, the IETF has had minimal discipline to the process of granting meeting time. Not none, but also not much. At base, this is indeed the stuff of project management. And while some ADs do press their chairs to properly justify their requests for meeting time, I believe it has not been all that widespread or all that diligent. Unfortunately, a meaningful change in our need for IETF Week meeting time will require ADs to become rather aggressive in pushing back on time requests, including setting threshholds, such as requiring wg progress before the meeting, and a meaningful initial agenda to explain how the time will be spent. d/ -- Dave Crocker Brandenburg InternetWorking bbiw.net