IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [93attendees] Meeting schedule

Andy Newton <andy@arin.net> Tue, 21 July 2015 11:38 UTC

Return-Path: <andy@arin.net>
X-Original-To: 93attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 93attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0DB541A034F; Tue, 21 Jul 2015 04:38:43 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.91
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.91 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1GKduv3kaCx4; Tue, 21 Jul 2015 04:38:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp2.arin.net (smtp2.arin.net [IPv6:2001:500:4:13::32]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 356E91A0282; Tue, 21 Jul 2015 04:38:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by smtp2.arin.net (Postfix, from userid 323) id E5A482139FB; Tue, 21 Jul 2015 07:38:34 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from chaedge01.corp.arin.net (chaedge01.corp.arin.net [192.149.252.118]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp2.arin.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 733BF21397E; Tue, 21 Jul 2015 07:38:34 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from CHACAS01.corp.arin.net (10.1.30.107) by chaedge01.corp.arin.net (192.149.252.118) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.210.2; Tue, 21 Jul 2015 07:46:26 -0400
Received: from CHAMBX02.corp.arin.net ([fe80::905e:9b4d:2909:f55a]) by CHACAS01.corp.arin.net ([fe80::a98b:1e52:e85a:5979%13]) with mapi id 14.03.0224.002; Tue, 21 Jul 2015 07:38:34 -0400
From: Andy Newton <andy@arin.net>
To: Alia Atlas <akatlas@gmail.com>
Thread-Topic: [93attendees] Meeting schedule
Thread-Index: AQHQwzm3BL5lRdVx0EO1qZlmg3wTt53lR2SAgAACTYCAAAFHgIAAUrOAgAAHjoCAADKsgIAAAR0AgAA3IwA=
Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2015 11:38:32 +0000
Message-ID: <206B4A8D-C038-4880-9DA1-AFCEBBBA3136@arin.net>
References: <p06240602d1d3231e977e@130.129.14.251> <alpine.OSX.2.01.1507201630210.60032@rabdullah.local> <D2E48F4F-CE89-4C1F-ACB4-85F219651A8C@juniper.net> <alpine.OSX.2.01.1507201650211.60032@rabdullah.local> <55ADCF31.20706@gmail.com> <A58586E3-63BA-431C-A85F-0DFCF913A328@gmail.com> <CAA=duU0amy4N1R4gZpRUEqGj-AoGnhdin-Xp7L8g7XpEAAr59A@mail.gmail.com> <CAG4d1rf2FHk6Qdc71VjQ2_oib9Cx1o5wm6SHbfXcWZNEur68GQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAG4d1rf2FHk6Qdc71VjQ2_oib9Cx1o5wm6SHbfXcWZNEur68GQ@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [192.149.252.96]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <A0003E9EA4328C4CBC5140AA667DFAF0@corp.arin.net>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/93attendees/ySbRtcS-24XBdPciBKHRwVWppPo>
Cc: Kireeti Kompella <kireeti@juniper.net>, "IAOC@ietf.org" <IAOC@ietf.org>, "Andrew G. Malis" <agmalis@gmail.com>, Yoav Nir <ynir.ietf@gmail.com>, "93attendees@ietf.org" <93attendees@ietf.org>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, Ole Jacobsen <olejacobsen@me.com>, Randall Gellens <rg+ietf@qti.qualcomm.com>
Subject: Re: [93attendees] Meeting schedule
X-BeenThere: 93attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Mailing list of IETF 93 attendees that have opted in on this list. " <93attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/93attendees>, <mailto:93attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/93attendees/>
List-Post: <mailto:93attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:93attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/93attendees>, <mailto:93attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2015 11:38:43 -0000

> On Jul 21, 2015, at 10:21 AM, Alia Atlas <akatlas@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> This IETF we had more WG meeting time requested than could be met.  With concern requested, the time requested did decrease.
> 
> The plenaries are in the morning because it allows the rooms to be reset during lunch.  Having them in the evening would have eaten the meeting rooms for the time slot before the plenary which would have further decreased the available meeting time for WG meetings.
> 
> I'm in the technical plenary now and it seems to be quite well attended.

I have a lot of sympathy for the secretariat and staff with regards to constant room rearrangements.

Another solution to the problem is to put the plenaries on Friday.

-andy

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email