Re: [93attendees] so, was there any crime?

"Wiley, Glen" <gwiley@verisign.com> Mon, 27 July 2015 14:49 UTC

Return-Path: <gwiley@verisign.com>
X-Original-To: 93attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 93attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F4901B2E62 for <93attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 27 Jul 2015 07:49:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id P9ZexrvXnPJm for <93attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 27 Jul 2015 07:49:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-oi0-f98.google.com (mail-oi0-f98.google.com [209.85.218.98]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 71AAB1B2E5B for <93attendees@ietf.org>; Mon, 27 Jul 2015 07:49:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by oibw187 with SMTP id w187so4936330oib.1 for <93attendees@ietf.org>; Mon, 27 Jul 2015 07:49:52 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:subject:thread-topic:thread-index:date :message-id:references:in-reply-to:accept-language:content-language :user-agent:content-type:content-id:content-transfer-encoding :mime-version; bh=CvkNr3AIlQB8lwiAQ54y03Cbdqtm7MIQAI+m9qiTEA8=; b=iKTXHHG4isYew5k4ZYFfvoXFoal0qv0VNnjCSTHrSQI2eBxnIEVJe3HHqvUkf7ea5X GekqPDq4qj3pAAXlIrVNyvwBc0c/y/119KXFtWL2LZvRc6KWL3gdnrwZTBkvtTL06yvN 9M/c13B6I8T3ipnc/u4b9ezxGtQKrNvdq/7y2Hz70ub4+ey0wpysgyyQpd7WcXNc+HFx aDZiDCnbkhEAlM2kTvZpZL6BAzkgOyGQhwLSSz1fmsy7aXkBBFHTIYrZfZ+mqrdHuMWy YB7fQsaQdTT6KhC6roDJ7DhZIkHS0UJ+JWAv/49c2VNj+vxA0yNu5CZawy5bJUQ7irWl 8iFg==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmzJkuT5FhUfA/uZENuCohTjRj5v6kKtCvFrjfc6f0COfuswhZGHKcidp+/ieLb716zcQ41LNTdgFXUpiK29n4gsF5ZNg==
X-Received: by 10.140.235.132 with SMTP id g126mr43880717qhc.101.1438008591735; Mon, 27 Jul 2015 07:49:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from brn1lxmailout02.verisign.com (brn1lxmailout02.verisign.com. [72.13.63.42]) by smtp-relay.gmail.com with ESMTPS id 17sm5629492qky.3.2015.07.27.07.49.51 (version=TLSv1 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Mon, 27 Jul 2015 07:49:51 -0700 (PDT)
X-Relaying-Domain: verisign.com
Received: from BRN1WNEXCHM01.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com (brn1wnexchm01 [10.173.152.255]) by brn1lxmailout02.verisign.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id t6REnp4f005291 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Mon, 27 Jul 2015 10:49:51 -0400
Received: from BRN1WNEXMBX01.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com ([::1]) by BRN1WNEXCHM01.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com ([::1]) with mapi id 14.03.0174.001; Mon, 27 Jul 2015 10:49:50 -0400
From: "Wiley, Glen" <gwiley@verisign.com>
To: David C Lawrence <tale@akamai.com>, "93attendees@ietf.org" <93attendees@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [93attendees] so, was there any crime?
Thread-Index: AQHQyHgsfdtRce/b5kW/hxKIHSa9hJ3vZgiA
Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2015 14:49:50 +0000
Message-ID: <D1DBBCF1.15DC2%gwiley@verisign.com>
References: <CAD62q9UkFF2hxNZ++ec15BpaOBZX6Z7Di+F=KsEtBsL0ucvb2w@mail.gmail.com> <21942.16255.474612.347992@tale.kendall.corp.akamai.com>
In-Reply-To: <21942.16255.474612.347992@tale.kendall.corp.akamai.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.4.9.150325
x-originating-ip: [10.173.152.4]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-ID: <78E0080B15E2FB4989D69E99007FDBC0@verisign.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/93attendees/zf82LlwjpFINkSYNHAWC_HsFv7s>
Subject: Re: [93attendees] so, was there any crime?
X-BeenThere: 93attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Mailing list of IETF 93 attendees that have opted in on this list. " <93attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/93attendees>, <mailto:93attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/93attendees/>
List-Post: <mailto:93attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:93attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/93attendees>, <mailto:93attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2015 14:49:54 -0000

<jk>

Didn¹t realize that disagreements in our WG meetings had escalated to the
point of physical injuries.

Are we shifting from hum to cage match?

Glad to hear about the low cost for medical care - yet another vote in
favor of benefits of this venue.


</jk>

On 7/27/15, 10:26 AM, "David C Lawrence" <tale@akamai.com> wrote:

>Aaron Falk writes:
>> Did the threats of pickpockets materialize?
>
>Being hobbled, as I was by a sprained ankle, tends to make someone
>hyper aware of their vulnerability ... the lame gazelle separated from
>the herd.  I was alert for the possibility that my infirmity might be
>taken advantage of in various scenarios, but really none of that ever
>materialized.
>
>Pretty much the worst "being taken advantage of" that I experience
>almost certainly had nothing to do with my injury but rather the cost
>of convenience.  When I asked my hotel for a taxi to the hospital they
>arranged one, and said it would be 250 CZK (~ 10 USD) for the ~ 1 km
>trip.  Further, the taxi didn't take credit cards so the desk clerk
>spot-changed $20 USD for me to 460 CZK, which isn't highway robbery
>but was certainly on the lower end of exchange.
>
>The return trip from the hospital, arranged by the people there, was
>80 CZK (~ 3.25).
>
>On the flip side of all that, even with no sort of applicable
>insurance, the grand total cost for four x-rays, a wrap with an
>analgesic pad, and a shiny new pair of crutches was about 50 USD.
>
>This also all made for superb treatment by Swiss Air and various
>airport personnel on the trip back ... enough so to briefly entertain
>(but of course reject) the idea of faking injuries for all future
>flights.
>
>_______________________________________________
>93attendees mailing list
>93attendees@ietf.org
>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/93attendees