Re: [94attendees] IHG "Non-qualifying Stay"?
Henrik Johansson <Henrik.Johansson@pfsw.com> Fri, 13 November 2015 08:45 UTC
Return-Path: <Henrik.Johansson@pfsw.com>
X-Original-To: 94attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 94attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D18C61A6F38 for <94attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 13 Nov 2015 00:45:19 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.902
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.902 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zU1a_kHxwGtT for <94attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 13 Nov 2015 00:45:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: from emea01-am1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-am1on0720.outbound.protection.outlook.com [IPv6:2a01:111:f400:fe00::720]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 67A201A1B8A for <94attendees@ietf.org>; Fri, 13 Nov 2015 00:43:42 -0800 (PST)
Received: from VI1PR03MB1326.eurprd03.prod.outlook.com (10.163.249.20) by VI1PR03MB1328.eurprd03.prod.outlook.com (10.163.249.22) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.1.318.15; Fri, 13 Nov 2015 08:43:24 +0000
Received: from VI1PR03MB1326.eurprd03.prod.outlook.com ([10.163.249.20]) by VI1PR03MB1326.eurprd03.prod.outlook.com ([10.163.249.20]) with mapi id 15.01.0318.003; Fri, 13 Nov 2015 08:43:23 +0000
From: Henrik Johansson <Henrik.Johansson@pfsw.com>
To: "Eggert, Lars" <lars@netapp.com>, "94attendees@ietf.org" <94attendees@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [94attendees] IHG "Non-qualifying Stay"?
Thread-Index: AQHRHe9bKs3Lyy20xkieSUMBj0fBFQ==
Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2015 08:43:23 +0000
Message-ID: <013D39B1-2D28-4709-9085-92011F3E8B42@pfsw.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/0.0.0.151105
authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=Henrik.Johansson@pfsw.com;
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-originating-ip: [92.244.31.21]
x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1; VI1PR03MB1328; 5:AEPGYL9us8Z5ZbqH54yY7SxZeIwWRxIGnQVyVgaIuhn0/fVbDHEGqOjLvGri8Sp3uXRVVRMGj2GRIIdAilP19uhgvpBxxRZiVSWBunvGGIGL8BNXyTpiqe+Lm1W6yZUwVmc8z8BYxH9yzlalS9aQfQ==; 24:EhpWiS9A1MEMZTvdluVWh8srZYJLkNZv33sp1KsITfvjCyxNvMbDnJJhxkP66nInIPq8c9TCgr1jD5PpMtpLXAsg1UVvrD02hJOwXceWhU0=; 20:Br8FOw2lxrA/TnvATNoqaiT23MbzzaD40mdFq7HjEAP6yj5h7whMAAzqo6y/bKziJsHmpfynL7FrYGUdqQEtrA==
x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:;BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:;SRVR:VI1PR03MB1328;
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <VI1PR03MB1328285F1ACFF666157E8636F9110@VI1PR03MB1328.eurprd03.prod.outlook.com>
x-exchange-antispam-report-test: UriScan:(207630850400036);
x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(601004)(2401047)(5005006)(520078)(8121501046)(10201501046)(3002001); SRVR:VI1PR03MB1328; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:; SRVR:VI1PR03MB1328;
x-forefront-prvs: 0759F7A50A
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(6009001)(24454002)(189002)(479174004)(199003)(54356999)(4001350100001)(5004730100002)(189998001)(5007970100001)(36756003)(86362001)(5008740100001)(19580405001)(40100003)(5001960100002)(81156007)(5001770100001)(122556002)(106356001)(33656002)(97736004)(50986999)(2501003)(92566002)(19580395003)(107886002)(5002640100001)(10400500002)(2900100001)(105586002)(101416001)(106116001)(83716003)(66066001)(77096005)(102836002)(87936001)(83506001)(82746002)(104396002); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:VI1PR03MB1328; H:VI1PR03MB1326.eurprd03.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; PTR:InfoNoRecords; MX:1; A:1; LANG:en;
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: pfsw.com does not designate permitted sender hosts)
spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:23
spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <A9A74CFA38D9EB49B5FCDE372798D113@eurprd03.prod.outlook.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: pfsw.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 13 Nov 2015 08:43:23.7273 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 60e41978-645c-418d-a3b0-86bbc856ebf9
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: VI1PR03MB1328
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/94attendees/02VnMTcEkzqYVDSR48kGUCu7MZg>
Subject: Re: [94attendees] IHG "Non-qualifying Stay"?
X-BeenThere: 94attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Mailing list of IETF 94 attendees that have opted in on this list. " <94attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/94attendees>, <mailto:94attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/94attendees/>
List-Post: <mailto:94attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:94attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/94attendees>, <mailto:94attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2015 08:45:20 -0000
I didn’t book under the IETF rate, but that is quite common that conference rates posts as non-qualifying. Try contacting the Ambassador support (if you are one) or the regular customer support and ask them why it has posted as non-qualifying. Sometimes it happen in error, so they can correct it. /Henrik On 13/11/15 09:31, "94attendees on behalf of Eggert, Lars" <94attendees-bounces@ietf.org on behalf of lars@netapp.com> wrote: >Hi, > >did anyone else have their Intercontinental Yokohama stay post to their IHG accounts as "non-qualifying?" > >Lars
- [94attendees] IHG "Non-qualifying Stay"? Eggert, Lars
- Re: [94attendees] IHG "Non-qualifying Stay"? Henrik Johansson
- Re: [94attendees] IHG "Non-qualifying Stay"? David C Lawrence
- Re: [94attendees] IHG "Non-qualifying Stay"? Samuel Weiler
- Re: [94attendees] IHG "Non-qualifying Stay"? Roberta Maglione (robmgl)
- Re: [94attendees] IHG "Non-qualifying Stay"? Gihan Dias
- Re: [94attendees] IHG "Non-qualifying Stay"? Eggert, Lars
- Re: [94attendees] IHG "Non-qualifying Stay"? Robert Moskowitz
- Re: [94attendees] IHG "Non-qualifying Stay"? ietf
- Re: [94attendees] IHG "Non-qualifying Stay"? Eggert, Lars
- Re: [94attendees] IHG "Non-qualifying Stay"? Roberta Maglione (robmgl)
- Re: [94attendees] IHG "Non-qualifying Stay"? ietf@johnlevine.com
- Re: [94attendees] IHG "Non-qualifying Stay"? Robert Moskowitz
- Re: [94attendees] IHG "Non-qualifying Stay"? Dirk Kutscher
- Re: [94attendees] IHG "Non-qualifying Stay"? Marc Blanchet
- Re: [94attendees] IHG "Non-qualifying Stay"? JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
- Re: [94attendees] IHG "Non-qualifying Stay"? Salz, Rich
- Re: [94attendees] IHG "Non-qualifying Stay"? Samuel Weiler
- Re: [94attendees] IHG "Non-qualifying Stay"? Samuel Weiler
- Re: [94attendees] IHG "Non-qualifying Stay"? Ralph Droms
- Re: [94attendees] IHG "Non-qualifying Stay"? Marc Blanchet
- Re: [94attendees] IHG "Non-qualifying Stay"? JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
- Re: [94attendees] IHG "Non-qualifying Stay"? Ralph Droms
- Re: [94attendees] IHG "Non-qualifying Stay"? Oleg Hahm
- Re: [94attendees] IHG "Non-qualifying Stay"? Deen, Glenn (NBCUniversal)
- Re: [94attendees] IHG "Non-qualifying Stay"? bruno.decraene
- Re: [94attendees] IHG "Non-qualifying Stay"? Bob Hinden
- Re: [94attendees] IHG "Non-qualifying Stay"? michal
- Re: [94attendees] IHG "Non-qualifying Stay"? Jakob Heitz (jheitz)
- Re: [94attendees] IHG "Non-qualifying Stay"? Sean Leonard
- Re: [94attendees] IHG "Non-qualifying Stay"? Eggert, Lars
- Re: [94attendees] IHG "Non-qualifying Stay"? Melinda Shore
- Re: [94attendees] IHG "Non-qualifying Stay"? Carlos M. Martinez
- Re: [94attendees] IHG "Non-qualifying Stay"? Eggert, Lars
- Re: [94attendees] IHG "Non-qualifying Stay"? Sean Leonard
- Re: [94attendees] IHG "Non-qualifying Stay"? Ole Jacobsen
- Re: [94attendees] [IAOC] IHG "Non-qualifying Stay… Tobias Gondrom
- Re: [94attendees] IHG "Non-qualifying Stay"? Andrew Sullivan
- Re: [94attendees] IHG "Non-qualifying Stay"? Bob Hinden
- Re: [94attendees] IHG "Non-qualifying Stay"? Hutton, Andrew