Re: [94attendees] IHG "Non-qualifying Stay"?

<bruno.decraene@orange.com> Wed, 18 November 2015 17:27 UTC

Return-Path: <bruno.decraene@orange.com>
X-Original-To: 94attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 94attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3CE531A8ADF for <94attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 18 Nov 2015 09:27:25 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id elGGDIADNSDH for <94attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 18 Nov 2015 09:27:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: from relais-inet.francetelecom.com (relais-ias91.francetelecom.com [193.251.215.91]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3994E1A8ADE for <94attendees@ietf.org>; Wed, 18 Nov 2015 09:27:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: from omfedm06.si.francetelecom.fr (unknown [xx.xx.xx.2]) by omfedm09.si.francetelecom.fr (ESMTP service) with ESMTP id 9A7EA2DC5C2; Wed, 18 Nov 2015 18:27:21 +0100 (CET)
Received: from Exchangemail-eme2.itn.ftgroup (unknown [10.114.31.61]) by omfedm06.si.francetelecom.fr (ESMTP service) with ESMTP id 7EDCA27C059; Wed, 18 Nov 2015 18:27:21 +0100 (CET)
Received: from OPEXCLILM21.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup ([fe80::e92a:c932:907e:8f06]) by OPEXCLILM7E.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup ([fe80::b91c:ea2c:ac8a:7462%19]) with mapi id 14.03.0248.002; Wed, 18 Nov 2015 18:27:21 +0100
From: <bruno.decraene@orange.com>
To: "Deen, Glenn (NBCUniversal)" <glenn.deen@nbcuni.com>, "94attendees@ietf.org" <94attendees@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [94attendees] IHG "Non-qualifying Stay"?
Thread-Index: AQHRIh38jemx9u5HzkiQ/+vKV83SLZ6h6BoAgAADIICAAAYSgIAABJcAgAARXFA=
Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2015 17:27:21 +0000
Message-ID: <8869_1447867641_564CB4F9_8869_13689_1_53C29892C857584299CBF5D05346208A0F6C04B5@OPEXCLILM21.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup>
References: <E0B9279C-1A3C-4E61-8F7E-6D78B15AA8BA@netapp.com> <22085.62797.741761.727196@tale.kendall.corp.akamai.com> <5e70f48cb49043408ceeeaedebd34f10@XCH-RCD-009.cisco.com> <22311667-3592-4CE4-A65D-DB2A1B90D09A@netapp.com> <82AB329A76E2484D934BBCA77E9F5249A6799E00@PALLENE.office.hd> <alpine.BSF.2.20.1511181126110.55717@fledge.watson.org> <E63AF10D-B895-4FE0-98C2-BE4BB00C602A@gmail.com> <6C72AC8E-50CA-459A-84EC-A189163D146B@consulintel.es> <7EB77F2C-F486-4A2B-B51C-6DC57FAAAEBD@gmail.com> <D271F0B5.8B3C7%glenn.deen@nbcuni.com>
In-Reply-To: <D271F0B5.8B3C7%glenn.deen@nbcuni.com>
Accept-Language: fr-FR, en-US
Content-Language: fr-FR
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.168.234.1]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-PMX-Version: 6.2.1.2478543, Antispam-Engine: 2.7.2.2107409, Antispam-Data: 2015.11.18.163617
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/94attendees/2zsJRvMkOZ3L7Oxc1ZG1CKKprDI>
Subject: Re: [94attendees] IHG "Non-qualifying Stay"?
X-BeenThere: 94attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Mailing list of IETF 94 attendees that have opted in on this list. " <94attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/94attendees>, <mailto:94attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/94attendees/>
List-Post: <mailto:94attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:94attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/94attendees>, <mailto:94attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2015 17:27:25 -0000

> I agree that the IAOC should not negotiate rates or venues based on what
> rewards programs would/would not be eligible.    However, it would
> reasonable and low effort to ask for full disclosure by the venue to
> inform the customer on the hotel registration page or hotel info, that the
> quoted rates do not qualify for the hotels rewards program.
> 
> The IAOC¹s only involvement would be to request the hotel to disclosure
> their policy.   The IAOC would not change their rate negotiations or any
> part of the site selection, they would only request the policy disclosure
> from the hotel.
> 
> That way people know what the policy is.

Another option is to put it on the IETF meeting wiki.
The first interested person asks the hotel and update the wiki. 
Can be done today for the next meeting  at the Buenos Aires Hilton.

-- Bruno
 
> 
> btw - I had this happen at IETF in Toronto - the Fairmont Royal York said
> the IETF rate did not qualify for their rewards program.  Life went on,
> but knowing the policy would have saved me the effort spent calling them
> to chase down why I didn¹t get credit.
> 
> -glenn
> 
> _______________________________________________
> 94attendees mailing list
> 94attendees@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/94attendees

_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc
pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler
a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration,
Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci.

This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law;
they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation.
If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments.
As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified.
Thank you.