Re: [94attendees] [homenet] IPv6 Prefix delegation on IETF network, please ?

[Mark Andrews <[e-mail]>]

Mark Andrews writes:
> 
> In message <[e-mail]>, Juliusz Chroboczek w
> ri
> tes:
> > > So what is the scope of the request and what needs to be simulated?
> > 
> > There are two distinct requests here:
> > 
> >  1. have the IETF DHCPv6 servers delegate a /60 (at least) to any client
> >     that requests it;
> 
> Sounds like you want the IETF to simulate being a WISP.  I suggest
> that you write down the complete plan and submit it to Jim Martin
> [e-mail] so the noc team can plan for it.  Jim will let you
> know if you need to ask elsewhere.  I can see several ways to do
> this each with its own tradeoffs and levels of noc support and
> preparation.
> 
> e.g.
> 
> From a Linux/BSD box and switch you supply w/ /44 from the noc, a

I meant a /52 which would give you 256 /60's to play with.

> DHCPv6 server and the DHCPv6 server just updating the routing table
> on the host.  The noc just supplies a port for the upstream connection
> and the address block.  Through to it being supported on all the
> ssids.
> 
> >  2. have the hnetd software automatically deal with the situation in which
> >     no DHCPv6 server performs prefix delegation by doing Proxy-ND or
> >     something equally hackish.
> > 
> > Request (1) comes from Toerless.  Request (2) comes from me, and, as noted
> > Gabriel, probably reflects a typically European point of view (since
> > a number of ISPs provide native-ish IPv6 but don't do PD).  The two
> > requests are not incompatible.
> >
> > -- Juliusz
> -- 
> Mark Andrews, ISC
> 1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia
> PHONE: [phone]                 INTERNET: [e-mail]
-- 
Mark Andrews, ISC
1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia
PHONE: [phone]                 INTERNET: [e-mail]