Re: [94attendees] IHG "Non-qualifying Stay"?

"Roberta Maglione (robmgl)" <robmgl@cisco.com> Wed, 18 November 2015 08:02 UTC

Return-Path: <robmgl@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: 94attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 94attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46DBD1B2A07 for <94attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 18 Nov 2015 00:02:15 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -8.186
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.186 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.8, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FM_IS_IT_OUR_ACCOUNT=4.2, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.585, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wEzsfl2SIP0S for <94attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 18 Nov 2015 00:02:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: from alln-iport-1.cisco.com (alln-iport-1.cisco.com [173.37.142.88]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E2F6A1B29FF for <94attendees@ietf.org>; Wed, 18 Nov 2015 00:02:13 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1393; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1447833733; x=1449043333; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=j58RCCxnG40HC6hDY8FeOaWvyp9slEv7q0oHRbK+ueA=; b=E8uYU8zeVKPRNmlzc22Qupc7wry2cRm26dz5ApYLo3T9pRQe43OCBZeY KVD8y7rmNPqqOD0abe84js57xqSmDTYDQceZNJ7I345XoRCGz7EuGfNph O4dPKzDIeIK0fGbRbKr7pZ1ZFEdXxyM8yFAyOXd0wWcjNSzZoj8nMX5/7 A=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: =?us-ascii?q?A0AVAgAYMExW/4cNJK1egztTbwa+YgENg?= =?us-ascii?q?WUXCoUkSgKBPTgUAQEBAQEBAYEKhDQBAQEEAQEBNw4mCwwEAgEIEQQBARYJCQc?= =?us-ascii?q?nCxQJCAIEAQ0FCIgmDbJsim0BAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEUBItShRqEH?= =?us-ascii?q?wWWSQGGCIcagWKWeINxAR8BAUKCER2BVnKDQgUEFyN9CgEBAQ?=
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.20,312,1444694400"; d="scan'208";a="209730667"
Received: from alln-core-2.cisco.com ([173.36.13.135]) by alln-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 18 Nov 2015 08:02:13 +0000
Received: from XCH-RCD-009.cisco.com (xch-rcd-009.cisco.com [173.37.102.19]) by alln-core-2.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id tAI82DRC020813 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Wed, 18 Nov 2015 08:02:13 GMT
Received: from xch-rcd-009.cisco.com (173.37.102.19) by XCH-RCD-009.cisco.com (173.37.102.19) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1104.5; Wed, 18 Nov 2015 02:02:12 -0600
Received: from xch-rcd-009.cisco.com ([173.37.102.19]) by XCH-RCD-009.cisco.com ([173.37.102.19]) with mapi id 15.00.1104.000; Wed, 18 Nov 2015 02:02:12 -0600
From: "Roberta Maglione (robmgl)" <robmgl@cisco.com>
To: David C Lawrence <tale@akamai.com>, Lars Eggert <lars@netapp.com>
Thread-Topic: [94attendees] IHG "Non-qualifying Stay"?
Thread-Index: AQHRHe2iyFHqsiy1oEKpNF8HGq4U6p6aafGAgAcIlDA=
Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2015 08:02:12 +0000
Message-ID: <5e70f48cb49043408ceeeaedebd34f10@XCH-RCD-009.cisco.com>
References: <E0B9279C-1A3C-4E61-8F7E-6D78B15AA8BA@netapp.com> <22085.62797.741761.727196@tale.kendall.corp.akamai.com>
In-Reply-To: <22085.62797.741761.727196@tale.kendall.corp.akamai.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.61.221.148]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/94attendees/3ekvLuxhfO9HKXu1bXJPpCeqNc8>
Cc: "94attendees@ietf.org" <94attendees@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [94attendees] IHG "Non-qualifying Stay"?
X-BeenThere: 94attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Mailing list of IETF 94 attendees that have opted in on this list. " <94attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/94attendees>, <mailto:94attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/94attendees/>
List-Post: <mailto:94attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:94attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/94attendees>, <mailto:94attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2015 08:02:15 -0000

The same for me.
I contacted the customer service and here there is their reply:

"After further review, we have confirmed the room rate paid during the stay in question was booked under a deeply discounted group rate. As such, it is ineligible for credit to your account per section 12  and 13 of the IHG Rewards Club Terms and Conditions. May we kindly inform you that points or miles will not be issued if your room is paid for by a trade group, association or company as part of a convention or group business meeting. If you stay at an IHG hotel under the terms of a contract or group commitment, you will not be eligible to receive points."

I still think they should have made this policy clear during the booking process.

Roberta
-----Original Message-----
From: 94attendees [mailto:94attendees-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of David C Lawrence
Sent: Friday, November 13, 2015 3:36 PM
To: Lars Eggert
Cc: 94attendees@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [94attendees] IHG "Non-qualifying Stay"?

Lars Eggert writes:
> did anyone else have their Intercontinental Yokohama stay post to 
> their IHG accounts as "non-qualifying?"

Me as well, and I the front desk said it was because it was a group rate.

_______________________________________________
94attendees mailing list
94attendees@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/94attendees