Re: [94attendees] [homenet] IPv6 Prefix delegation on IETF network, please ?
Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> Wed, 04 November 2015 03:12 UTC
Return-Path: <mcr@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: 94attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 94attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ADAB71A8BAF; Tue, 3 Nov 2015 19:12:38 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.59
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.59 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HOST_MISMATCH_NET=0.311, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kPKiOMiIrRAT; Tue, 3 Nov 2015 19:12:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: from relay.sandelman.ca (relay.cooperix.net [176.58.120.209]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7ED1D1A8AAE; Tue, 3 Nov 2015 19:12:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: from sandelman.ca (dhcp-32-243.meeting.ietf94.jp [133.93.32.243]) by relay.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3C43F2208B; Tue, 3 Nov 2015 22:12:35 -0500 (EST)
Received: by sandelman.ca (Postfix, from userid 179) id EB59661E13; Wed, 4 Nov 2015 12:12:30 +0900 (JST)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
To: "94attendees@ietf.org" <94attendees@ietf.org>, HOMENET <homenet@ietf.org>, hackathon@ietf.org
In-reply-to: <20151103225320.19CEA3BC0320@rock.dv.isc.org>
References: <20151102055200.GI31730@cisco.com> <7iio5k5kpz.wl-jch@pps.univ-paris-diderot.fr> <5136.1446543935@dooku.sandelman.ca> <CAL0WyWyTiuMP2gXKaM+oLyY2MzHU4Bw-NpaBZSfLLJntQFeWXA@mail.gmail.com> <20151103211649.4A0CD3BBF89A@rock.dv.isc.org> <87twp2oj05.wl-jch@pps.univ-paris-diderot.fr> <20151103225320.19CEA3BC0320@rock.dv.isc.org>
Comments: In-reply-to Mark Andrews <marka@isc.org> message dated "Wed, 04 Nov 2015 09:53:20 +1100."
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6; nmh 1.6+dev; GNU Emacs 24.4.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Wed, 04 Nov 2015 12:12:30 +0900
Message-ID: <20141.1446606750@dooku.sandelman.ca>
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/94attendees/EsFwnbYkdAnGAhuTvqgQnwNd5lc>
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 04 Nov 2015 15:19:00 -0800
Cc: Toerless Eckert <eckert@cisco.com>, Gabriel Kerneis <kerneis@google.com>, Juliusz Chroboczek <jch@pps.univ-paris-diderot.fr>
Subject: Re: [94attendees] [homenet] IPv6 Prefix delegation on IETF network, please ?
X-BeenThere: 94attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Mailing list of IETF 94 attendees that have opted in on this list. " <94attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/94attendees>, <mailto:94attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/94attendees/>
List-Post: <mailto:94attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:94attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/94attendees>, <mailto:94attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 Nov 2015 03:12:38 -0000
Mark Andrews <marka@isc.org> wrote: > From a Linux/BSD box and switch you supply w/ /44 from the noc, a > DHCPv6 server and the DHCPv6 server just updating the routing table on > the host. The noc just supplies a port for the upstream connection and > the address block. Through to it being supported on all the ssids. I was thinking that we would have to ask the NOC for a /44. But, I'm thinking that actually we can probably just ask the NOC to announce the address space. That decouples things much better and lets one set it all up beforehand, debug it, and potentially take it elsewhere. We can probably survive with a /48, which would give us 256 "customers" It might be good to have two topologically "distant" /48s to setup two ISPs [so that the two sets of addresses are more easily distinguished by humans]. Probably need a small x86 box plus a 16-24 port switch as we likely don't want this stuff on the IETF "LAN" I will volunteer to set something up; it fits into part of my day job as a matter of fact. I can't promise to be in Buenos-Ares though. -- Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>, Sandelman Software Works -= IPv6 IoT consulting =-
- [94attendees] IPv6 Prefix delegation on IETF netw… Toerless Eckert
- Re: [94attendees] [homenet] IPv6 Prefix delegatio… Markus Stenberg
- Re: [94attendees] [homenet] IPv6 Prefix delegatio… Michael Richardson
- Re: [94attendees] [homenet] IPv6 Prefix delegatio… Juliusz Chroboczek
- Re: [94attendees] [homenet] IPv6 Prefix delegatio… Michael Richardson
- Re: [94attendees] [homenet] IPv6 Prefix delegatio… Mark Andrews
- Re: [94attendees] [homenet] IPv6 Prefix delegatio… Juliusz Chroboczek
- Re: [94attendees] [homenet] IPv6 Prefix delegatio… Gabriel Kerneis
- Re: [94attendees] [homenet] IPv6 Prefix delegatio… Mark Andrews
- Re: [94attendees] [homenet] IPv6 Prefix delegatio… Mark Andrews
- Re: [94attendees] [homenet] IPv6 Prefix delegatio… Alexandre Petrescu
- Re: [94attendees] [homenet] IPv6 Prefix delegatio… Alexandre Petrescu
- Re: [94attendees] [homenet] IPv6 Prefix delegatio… Michael Richardson
- Re: [94attendees] [homenet] IPv6 Prefix delegatio… joel jaeggli
- Re: [94attendees] [homenet] IPv6 Prefix delegatio… Ted Lemon
- Re: [94attendees] [homenet] IPv6 Prefix delegatio… Ted Lemon
- Re: [94attendees] [homenet] IPv6 Prefix delegatio… Alexandre PETRESCU
- Re: [94attendees] [homenet] IPv6 Prefix delegatio… Mikael Abrahamsson
- Re: [94attendees] [homenet] IPv6 Prefix delegatio… Ted Lemon
- Re: [94attendees] [homenet] IPv6 Prefix delegatio… Mikael Abrahamsson
- Re: [94attendees] IPv6 Prefix delegation on IETF … Jim Martin
- Re: [94attendees] [homenet] IPv6 Prefix delegatio… Christian Huitema