Re: [94attendees] IHG "Non-qualifying Stay"?

"Hutton, Andrew" <andrew.hutton@unify.com> Mon, 23 November 2015 10:17 UTC

Return-Path: <andrew.hutton@unify.com>
X-Original-To: 94attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 94attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9CCD11A88A3 for <94attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 23 Nov 2015 02:17:06 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.485
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.485 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.8, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.585] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0Vdpf_CbB8lr for <94attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 23 Nov 2015 02:17:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx11.unify.com (mx11.unify.com [62.134.46.9]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C3CB1A8863 for <94attendees@ietf.org>; Mon, 23 Nov 2015 02:17:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: from MCHP02HTC.global-ad.net (unknown [172.29.42.235]) by mx11.unify.com (Server) with ESMTP id 075EC1EB85B2 for <94attendees@ietf.org>; Mon, 23 Nov 2015 11:17:04 +0100 (CET)
Received: from MCHP04MSX.global-ad.net ([169.254.37.243]) by MCHP02HTC.global-ad.net ([172.29.42.235]) with mapi id 14.03.0248.002; Mon, 23 Nov 2015 11:17:03 +0100
From: "Hutton, Andrew" <andrew.hutton@unify.com>
To: "94attendees@ietf.org" <94attendees@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [94attendees] IHG "Non-qualifying Stay"?
Thread-Index: AQHRHe2iyFHqsiy1oEKpNF8HGq4U6p6Z9JiAgAdtpQCAAAD2AIAAW2gAgAAA64CAAd5igIAABVAAgAXQyxA=
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2015 10:17:03 +0000
Message-ID: <9F33F40F6F2CD847824537F3C4E37DDF1E8F6B5D@MCHP04MSX.global-ad.net>
References: <20151118133248.26202.qmail@ary.lan> <6E9B7510-65A5-4E21-B19D-9DB959033445@netapp.com> <20151119180817.GU30327@mx2.yitter.info> <88E903F0-1E57-45E8-8734-89BE0DF7236C@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <88E903F0-1E57-45E8-8734-89BE0DF7236C@gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [172.29.42.225]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/94attendees/FMl06JinpofJSYAbiB5mP21-HYs>
Subject: Re: [94attendees] IHG "Non-qualifying Stay"?
X-BeenThere: 94attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Mailing list of IETF 94 attendees that have opted in on this list. " <94attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/94attendees>, <mailto:94attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/94attendees/>
List-Post: <mailto:94attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:94attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/94attendees>, <mailto:94attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2015 10:17:06 -0000

At a recent conference held at a Hilton I got double Hilton points for the stay I guess it is something the conference organizers need to negotiate with the hotel upfront.

Andy



> -----Original Message-----
> From: 94attendees [mailto:94attendees-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of
> Bob Hinden
> Sent: 19 November 2015 18:27
> To: Andrew Sullivan
> Cc: 94attendees@ietf.org; Bob Hinden
> Subject: Re: [94attendees] IHG "Non-qualifying Stay"?
> 
> 
> > On Nov 19, 2015, at 10:08 AM, Andrew Sullivan
> <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com>; wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 01:36:05PM +0000, Eggert, Lars wrote:
> >>> since forever.
> >>
> >> Never happened to me, since forever.
> >
> > It's happened to me at least 3 times at IETF meetings.  I guess
> you're
> > better than me :)
> 
> I think it’s very hotel program dependent.  I tend to also get "non-
> qualifying" when I am using a corporate rate at IHG hotels for non-IETF
> trips.
> 
> Bob
>