Re: [94attendees] IHG "Non-qualifying Stay"?
"Hutton, Andrew" <andrew.hutton@unify.com> Mon, 23 November 2015 10:17 UTC
Return-Path: <andrew.hutton@unify.com>
X-Original-To: 94attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 94attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9CCD11A88A3 for <94attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 23 Nov 2015 02:17:06 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.485
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.485 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.8, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.585] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0Vdpf_CbB8lr for <94attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 23 Nov 2015 02:17:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx11.unify.com (mx11.unify.com [62.134.46.9]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C3CB1A8863 for <94attendees@ietf.org>; Mon, 23 Nov 2015 02:17:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: from MCHP02HTC.global-ad.net (unknown [172.29.42.235]) by mx11.unify.com (Server) with ESMTP id 075EC1EB85B2 for <94attendees@ietf.org>; Mon, 23 Nov 2015 11:17:04 +0100 (CET)
Received: from MCHP04MSX.global-ad.net ([169.254.37.243]) by MCHP02HTC.global-ad.net ([172.29.42.235]) with mapi id 14.03.0248.002; Mon, 23 Nov 2015 11:17:03 +0100
From: "Hutton, Andrew" <andrew.hutton@unify.com>
To: "94attendees@ietf.org" <94attendees@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [94attendees] IHG "Non-qualifying Stay"?
Thread-Index: AQHRHe2iyFHqsiy1oEKpNF8HGq4U6p6Z9JiAgAdtpQCAAAD2AIAAW2gAgAAA64CAAd5igIAABVAAgAXQyxA=
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2015 10:17:03 +0000
Message-ID: <9F33F40F6F2CD847824537F3C4E37DDF1E8F6B5D@MCHP04MSX.global-ad.net>
References: <20151118133248.26202.qmail@ary.lan> <6E9B7510-65A5-4E21-B19D-9DB959033445@netapp.com> <20151119180817.GU30327@mx2.yitter.info> <88E903F0-1E57-45E8-8734-89BE0DF7236C@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <88E903F0-1E57-45E8-8734-89BE0DF7236C@gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [172.29.42.225]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/94attendees/FMl06JinpofJSYAbiB5mP21-HYs>
Subject: Re: [94attendees] IHG "Non-qualifying Stay"?
X-BeenThere: 94attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Mailing list of IETF 94 attendees that have opted in on this list. " <94attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/94attendees>, <mailto:94attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/94attendees/>
List-Post: <mailto:94attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:94attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/94attendees>, <mailto:94attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2015 10:17:06 -0000
At a recent conference held at a Hilton I got double Hilton points for the stay I guess it is something the conference organizers need to negotiate with the hotel upfront. Andy > -----Original Message----- > From: 94attendees [mailto:94attendees-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of > Bob Hinden > Sent: 19 November 2015 18:27 > To: Andrew Sullivan > Cc: 94attendees@ietf.org; Bob Hinden > Subject: Re: [94attendees] IHG "Non-qualifying Stay"? > > > > On Nov 19, 2015, at 10:08 AM, Andrew Sullivan > <ajs@anvilwalrusden.com> wrote: > > > > On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 01:36:05PM +0000, Eggert, Lars wrote: > >>> since forever. > >> > >> Never happened to me, since forever. > > > > It's happened to me at least 3 times at IETF meetings. I guess > you're > > better than me :) > > I think it’s very hotel program dependent. I tend to also get "non- > qualifying" when I am using a corporate rate at IHG hotels for non-IETF > trips. > > Bob >
- [94attendees] IHG "Non-qualifying Stay"? Eggert, Lars
- Re: [94attendees] IHG "Non-qualifying Stay"? Henrik Johansson
- Re: [94attendees] IHG "Non-qualifying Stay"? David C Lawrence
- Re: [94attendees] IHG "Non-qualifying Stay"? Samuel Weiler
- Re: [94attendees] IHG "Non-qualifying Stay"? Roberta Maglione (robmgl)
- Re: [94attendees] IHG "Non-qualifying Stay"? Gihan Dias
- Re: [94attendees] IHG "Non-qualifying Stay"? Eggert, Lars
- Re: [94attendees] IHG "Non-qualifying Stay"? Robert Moskowitz
- Re: [94attendees] IHG "Non-qualifying Stay"? ietf
- Re: [94attendees] IHG "Non-qualifying Stay"? Eggert, Lars
- Re: [94attendees] IHG "Non-qualifying Stay"? Roberta Maglione (robmgl)
- Re: [94attendees] IHG "Non-qualifying Stay"? ietf@johnlevine.com
- Re: [94attendees] IHG "Non-qualifying Stay"? Robert Moskowitz
- Re: [94attendees] IHG "Non-qualifying Stay"? Dirk Kutscher
- Re: [94attendees] IHG "Non-qualifying Stay"? Marc Blanchet
- Re: [94attendees] IHG "Non-qualifying Stay"? JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
- Re: [94attendees] IHG "Non-qualifying Stay"? Salz, Rich
- Re: [94attendees] IHG "Non-qualifying Stay"? Samuel Weiler
- Re: [94attendees] IHG "Non-qualifying Stay"? Samuel Weiler
- Re: [94attendees] IHG "Non-qualifying Stay"? Ralph Droms
- Re: [94attendees] IHG "Non-qualifying Stay"? Marc Blanchet
- Re: [94attendees] IHG "Non-qualifying Stay"? JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
- Re: [94attendees] IHG "Non-qualifying Stay"? Ralph Droms
- Re: [94attendees] IHG "Non-qualifying Stay"? Oleg Hahm
- Re: [94attendees] IHG "Non-qualifying Stay"? Deen, Glenn (NBCUniversal)
- Re: [94attendees] IHG "Non-qualifying Stay"? bruno.decraene
- Re: [94attendees] IHG "Non-qualifying Stay"? Bob Hinden
- Re: [94attendees] IHG "Non-qualifying Stay"? michal
- Re: [94attendees] IHG "Non-qualifying Stay"? Jakob Heitz (jheitz)
- Re: [94attendees] IHG "Non-qualifying Stay"? Sean Leonard
- Re: [94attendees] IHG "Non-qualifying Stay"? Eggert, Lars
- Re: [94attendees] IHG "Non-qualifying Stay"? Melinda Shore
- Re: [94attendees] IHG "Non-qualifying Stay"? Carlos M. Martinez
- Re: [94attendees] IHG "Non-qualifying Stay"? Eggert, Lars
- Re: [94attendees] IHG "Non-qualifying Stay"? Sean Leonard
- Re: [94attendees] IHG "Non-qualifying Stay"? Ole Jacobsen
- Re: [94attendees] [IAOC] IHG "Non-qualifying Stay… Tobias Gondrom
- Re: [94attendees] IHG "Non-qualifying Stay"? Andrew Sullivan
- Re: [94attendees] IHG "Non-qualifying Stay"? Bob Hinden
- Re: [94attendees] IHG "Non-qualifying Stay"? Hutton, Andrew