Re: [94attendees] IHG "Non-qualifying Stay"?

"Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com> Wed, 18 November 2015 15:50 UTC

Return-Path: <rsalz@akamai.com>
X-Original-To: 94attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 94attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8C221B384A for <94attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 18 Nov 2015 07:50:13 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.286
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.286 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.585, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TCtUph8tAb7g for <94attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 18 Nov 2015 07:50:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: from prod-mail-xrelay06.akamai.com (prod-mail-xrelay06.akamai.com [96.6.114.98]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33CA11B3856 for <94attendees@ietf.org>; Wed, 18 Nov 2015 07:50:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: from prod-mail-xrelay06.akamai.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by postfix.imss70 (Postfix) with ESMTP id 836D916C1E2 for <94attendees@ietf.org>; Wed, 18 Nov 2015 15:50:11 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from prod-mail-relay09.akamai.com (prod-mail-relay09.akamai.com [172.27.22.68]) by prod-mail-xrelay06.akamai.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6DFDC16C0B9 for <94attendees@ietf.org>; Wed, 18 Nov 2015 15:50:11 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=akamai.com; s=a1; t=1447861811; bh=FkqxJXwbpjYmSmSBo79x/6iusFh+OxcveUxD+8yxuAM=; l=378; h=From:To:Date:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=DRgfyfBEjGAsn3cGxurlJ+hZHEf7gQ93evlUq70Og6rQsYtYckra7ZIe6gP4InONT 2vc2hWdsySXGkJxb6IJmuc4W68XGoeoYVmkk782xPPoc2ptCYUc+Ouczmab1JjUB8Y ZpTn6qMoOUTzjZ1cW3PtEZLqUyKiGk4y5FGzc22w=
Received: from email.msg.corp.akamai.com (usma1ex-cas3.msg.corp.akamai.com [172.27.123.32]) by prod-mail-relay09.akamai.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 552A91E080 for <94attendees@ietf.org>; Wed, 18 Nov 2015 15:50:11 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from USMA1EX-DAG1MB1.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.123.101) by usma1ex-dag1mb2.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.123.102) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1076.9; Wed, 18 Nov 2015 10:50:10 -0500
Received: from USMA1EX-DAG1MB1.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.123.101]) by usma1ex-dag1mb1.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.123.101]) with mapi id 15.00.1076.000; Wed, 18 Nov 2015 10:50:10 -0500
From: "Salz, Rich" <rsalz@akamai.com>
To: "94attendees@ietf.org" <94attendees@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [94attendees] IHG "Non-qualifying Stay"?
Thread-Index: AQHRHe2iyFHqsiy1oEKpNF8HGq4U6p6aWS2AgAdtpQCAAAP0gIAAcNgAgAANI4D//6yyoA==
Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2015 15:50:09 +0000
Message-ID: <9e94a6c726b94b27b68b02beafa64acf@usma1ex-dag1mb1.msg.corp.akamai.com>
References: <E0B9279C-1A3C-4E61-8F7E-6D78B15AA8BA@netapp.com> <22085.62797.741761.727196@tale.kendall.corp.akamai.com> <5e70f48cb49043408ceeeaedebd34f10@XCH-RCD-009.cisco.com> <22311667-3592-4CE4-A65D-DB2A1B90D09A@netapp.com> <82AB329A76E2484D934BBCA77E9F5249A6799E00@PALLENE.office.hd> <A4C23FAD-D9AB-43BE-BB2B-BB53667AB88C@consulintel.es>
In-Reply-To: <A4C23FAD-D9AB-43BE-BB2B-BB53667AB88C@consulintel.es>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [172.19.60.92]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/94attendees/FlbFyg1HotlAcu0fKPrzTZu8i5M>
Subject: Re: [94attendees] IHG "Non-qualifying Stay"?
X-BeenThere: 94attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Mailing list of IETF 94 attendees that have opted in on this list. " <94attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/94attendees>, <mailto:94attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/94attendees/>
List-Post: <mailto:94attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:94attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/94attendees>, <mailto:94attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2015 15:50:13 -0000

> One of the requirements to select an hotel for an IETF meeting MUST BE to respect the rewards programs. Otherwise the community must be consulted.

Over 1000 people attend the IETF.  Consult the community and coordinate those opinions into a rough consensus?

Crazy.